Hybrid Inverse Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08848v2
• Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:17:20 GMT
• Title: Hybrid Inverse Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Juntao Ren, Gokul Swamy, Zhiwei Steven Wu, J. Andrew Bagnell, Sanjiban Choudhury,
• Abstract summary: inverse reinforcement learning approach to imitation learning is a double-edged sword. We propose using hybrid RL -- training on a mixture of online and expert data -- to curtail unnecessary exploration. We derive both model-free and model-based hybrid inverse RL algorithms with strong policy performance guarantees.
• Score: 34.793570631021005
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The inverse reinforcement learning approach to imitation learning is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it can enable learning from a smaller number of expert demonstrations with more robustness to error compounding than behavioral cloning approaches. On the other hand, it requires that the learner repeatedly solve a computationally expensive reinforcement learning (RL) problem. Often, much of this computation is wasted searching over policies very dissimilar to the expert's. In this work, we propose using hybrid RL -- training on a mixture of online and expert data -- to curtail unnecessary exploration. Intuitively, the expert data focuses the learner on good states during training, which reduces the amount of exploration required to compute a strong policy. Notably, such an approach doesn't need the ability to reset the learner to arbitrary states in the environment, a requirement of prior work in efficient inverse RL. More formally, we derive a reduction from inverse RL to expert-competitive RL (rather than globally optimal RL) that allows us to dramatically reduce interaction during the inner policy search loop while maintaining the benefits of the IRL approach. This allows us to derive both model-free and model-based hybrid inverse RL algorithms with strong policy performance guarantees. Empirically, we find that our approaches are significantly more sample efficient than standard inverse RL and several other baselines on a suite of continuous control tasks.

Related papers

• The Virtues of Pessimism in Inverse Reinforcement Learning [38.98656220917943]
  Inverse Reinforcement Learning is a powerful framework for learning complex behaviors from expert demonstrations. It is desirable to reduce the exploration burden by leveraging expert demonstrations in the inner-loop RL. We consider an alternative approach to speeding up the RL in IRL: emphpessimism, i.e., staying close to the expert's data distribution, instantiated via the use of offline RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T21:22:29Z)
• Supplementing Gradient-Based Reinforcement Learning with Simple Evolutionary Ideas [4.873362301533824]
  We present a simple, sample-efficient algorithm for introducing large but directed learning steps in reinforcement learning (RL) The methodology uses a population of RL agents training with a common experience buffer, with occasional crossovers and mutations of the agents in order to search efficiently through the policy space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T09:46:53Z)
• Mastering the Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning Benchmark from Pixels [112.63440666617494]
  Reinforcement learning algorithms can succeed but require large amounts of interactions between the agent and the environment. We propose a new method to solve it, using unsupervised model-based RL, for pre-training the agent. We show robust performance on the Real-Word RL benchmark, hinting at resiliency to environment perturbations during adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-24T14:22:29Z)
• Reward Uncertainty for Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning [88.34958680436552]
  We present an exploration method specifically for preference-based reinforcement learning algorithms. Our main idea is to design an intrinsic reward by measuring the novelty based on learned reward. Our experiments show that exploration bonus from uncertainty in learned reward improves both feedback- and sample-efficiency of preference-based RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T23:22:10Z)
• Jump-Start Reinforcement Learning [68.82380421479675]
  We present a meta algorithm that can use offline data, demonstrations, or a pre-existing policy to initialize an RL policy. In particular, we propose Jump-Start Reinforcement Learning (JSRL), an algorithm that employs two policies to solve tasks. We show via experiments that JSRL is able to significantly outperform existing imitation and reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-05T17:25:22Z)
• Decoupling Exploration and Exploitation in Reinforcement Learning [8.946655323517092]
  We propose Decoupled RL (DeRL) which trains separate policies for exploration and exploitation. We evaluate DeRL algorithms in two sparse-reward environments with multiple types of intrinsic rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T15:31:02Z)
• Text Generation with Efficient (Soft) Q-Learning [91.47743595382758]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) offers a more flexible solution by allowing users to plug in arbitrary task metrics as reward. We introduce a new RL formulation for text generation from the soft Q-learning perspective. We apply the approach to a wide range of tasks, including learning from noisy/negative examples, adversarial attacks, and prompt generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T18:48:40Z)
• Combining Pessimism with Optimism for Robust and Efficient Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning [56.17667147101263]
  In real-world tasks, reinforcement learning agents encounter situations that are not present during training time. To ensure reliable performance, the RL agents need to exhibit robustness against worst-case situations. We propose the Robust Hallucinated Upper-Confidence RL (RH-UCRL) algorithm to provably solve this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T16:50:17Z)
• Learning Dexterous Manipulation from Suboptimal Experts [69.8017067648129]
  Relative Entropy Q-Learning (REQ) is a simple policy algorithm that combines ideas from successful offline and conventional RL algorithms. We show how REQ is also effective for general off-policy RL, offline RL, and RL from demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-16T18:48:49Z)
• FOCAL: Efficient Fully-Offline Meta-Reinforcement Learning via Distance Metric Learning and Behavior Regularization [10.243908145832394]
  We study the offline meta-reinforcement learning (OMRL) problem, a paradigm which enables reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms to quickly adapt to unseen tasks. This problem is still not fully understood, for which two major challenges need to be addressed. We provide analysis and insight showing that some simple design choices can yield substantial improvements over recent approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-02T17:13:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.