Cultural Commonsense Knowledge for Intercultural Dialogues

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10689v3
• Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:28:44 GMT
• Title: Cultural Commonsense Knowledge for Intercultural Dialogues
• Authors: Tuan-Phong Nguyen, Simon Razniewski, Gerhard Weikum,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents MANGO, a methodology for distilling high-accuracy, high-recall assertions of cultural knowledge. Running the MANGO method with GPT-3.5 as underlying LLM yields 167K high-accuracy assertions for 30K concepts and 11K cultures. We find that adding knowledge from MANGO improves the overall quality, specificity, and cultural sensitivity of dialogue responses.
• Score: 31.079990829088857
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite recent progress, large language models (LLMs) still face the challenge of appropriately reacting to the intricacies of social and cultural conventions. This paper presents MANGO, a methodology for distilling high-accuracy, high-recall assertions of cultural knowledge. We judiciously and iteratively prompt LLMs for this purpose from two entry points, concepts and cultures. Outputs are consolidated via clustering and generative summarization. Running the MANGO method with GPT-3.5 as underlying LLM yields 167K high-accuracy assertions for 30K concepts and 11K cultures, surpassing prior resources by a large margin in quality and size. In an extrinsic evaluation for intercultural dialogues, we explore augmenting dialogue systems with cultural knowledge assertions. Notably, despite LLMs inherently possessing cultural knowledge, we find that adding knowledge from MANGO improves the overall quality, specificity, and cultural sensitivity of dialogue responses, as judged by human annotators. Data and code are available for download.

Related papers

• Survey of Cultural Awareness in Language Models: Text and Beyond [39.77033652289063]
  Large-scale deployment of large language models (LLMs) in various applications requires LLMs to be culturally sensitive to the user to ensure inclusivity. Culture has been widely studied in psychology and anthropology, and there has been a recent surge in research on making LLMs more culturally inclusive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T16:37:50Z)
• Self-Alignment: Improving Alignment of Cultural Values in LLMs via In-Context Learning [13.034603322224548]
  We present a simple and inexpensive method that uses a combination of in-context learning (ICL) and human survey data. We show that our method could prove useful in test languages other than English and can improve alignment to the cultural values that correspond to a range of culturally diverse countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T12:18:04Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models [53.626808086522985]
  We focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks. We evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts. We find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T14:03:27Z)
• CulturePark: Boosting Cross-cultural Understanding in Large Language Models [63.452948673344395]
  This paper introduces CulturePark, an LLM-powered multi-agent communication framework for cultural data collection. It generates high-quality cross-cultural dialogues encapsulating human beliefs, norms, and customs. We evaluate these models across three downstream tasks: content moderation, cultural alignment, and cultural education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T01:49:02Z)
• Understanding the Capabilities and Limitations of Large Language Models for Cultural Commonsense [98.09670425244462]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial commonsense understanding. This paper examines the capabilities and limitations of several state-of-the-art LLMs in the context of cultural commonsense tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T20:28:34Z)
• CULTURE-GEN: Revealing Global Cultural Perception in Language Models through Natural Language Prompting [73.94059188347582]
  We uncover culture perceptions of three SOTA models on 110 countries and regions on 8 culture-related topics through culture-conditioned generations. We discover that culture-conditioned generation consist of linguistic "markers" that distinguish marginalized cultures apart from default cultures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T00:50:43Z)
• CulturalTeaming: AI-Assisted Interactive Red-Teaming for Challenging LLMs' (Lack of) Multicultural Knowledge [69.82940934994333]
  We introduce CulturalTeaming, an interactive red-teaming system that leverages human-AI collaboration to build challenging evaluation dataset. Our study reveals that CulturalTeaming's various modes of AI assistance support annotators in creating cultural questions. CULTURALBENCH-V0.1 is a compact yet high-quality evaluation dataset with users' red-teaming attempts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T00:25:09Z)
• Massively Multi-Cultural Knowledge Acquisition & LM Benchmarking [48.21982147529661]
  This paper introduces a novel approach for massively multicultural knowledge acquisition. Our method strategically navigates from densely informative Wikipedia documents on cultural topics to an extensive network of linked pages. Our work marks an important step towards deeper understanding and bridging the gaps of cultural disparities in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T18:16:54Z)
• Bridging Cultural Nuances in Dialogue Agents through Cultural Value Surveys [20.82269206759988]
  cuDialog is a first-of-its-kind benchmark for dialogue generation with a cultural lens. We develop baseline models capable of extracting cultural attributes from dialogue exchanges. We propose to incorporate cultural dimensions with dialogue encoding features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T19:42:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.