The Price of Adaptivity in Stochastic Convex Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10898v3
• Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 14:04:51 GMT
• Title: The Price of Adaptivity in Stochastic Convex Optimization
• Authors: Yair Carmon, Oliver Hinder,
• Abstract summary: We prove results for adaptivity in non-smooth convex optimization. We define a "price of adaptivity" (PoA) that measures the multiplicative increase in suboptimality.
• Score: 23.776027867314628
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We prove impossibility results for adaptivity in non-smooth stochastic convex optimization. Given a set of problem parameters we wish to adapt to, we define a "price of adaptivity" (PoA) that, roughly speaking, measures the multiplicative increase in suboptimality due to uncertainty in these parameters. When the initial distance to the optimum is unknown but a gradient norm bound is known, we show that the PoA is at least logarithmic for expected suboptimality, and double-logarithmic for median suboptimality. When there is uncertainty in both distance and gradient norm, we show that the PoA must be polynomial in the level of uncertainty. Our lower bounds nearly match existing upper bounds, and establish that there is no parameter-free lunch. En route, we also establish tight upper and lower bounds for (known-parameter) high-probability stochastic convex optimization with heavy-tailed and bounded noise, respectively.

Related papers

• Convergence Analysis of Adaptive Gradient Methods under Refined Smoothness and Noise Assumptions [18.47705532817026]
  We show that AdaGrad outperforms SGD by a factor of $d$ under certain conditions. Motivated by this, we introduce assumptions on the smoothness structure of the objective and the gradient variance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T02:55:57Z)
• High-Probability Bounds for Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inequalities: the Case of Unbounded Variance [59.211456992422136]
  We propose algorithms with high-probability convergence results under less restrictive assumptions. These results justify the usage of the considered methods for solving problems that do not fit standard functional classes in optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T10:37:23Z)
• Nest Your Adaptive Algorithm for Parameter-Agnostic Nonconvex Minimax Optimization [24.784754071913255]
  Adaptive algorithms like AdaGrad and AMS are successful in nonspecific parameters robustness. We show that NeAda can achieve the near-optimal level of knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T20:11:05Z)
• Making SGD Parameter-Free [28.088227276891885]
  Our algorithm is conceptually simple, has high-probability guarantees, and is partially adaptive to unknown gradient norms, smoothness, and strong convexity. At the heart of our results is a novel parameter-free certificate for SGD step size choice, and a time-uniform concentration result that assumes no a-priori bounds on SGD iterates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T16:29:38Z)
• The Power of Adaptivity in SGD: Self-Tuning Step Sizes with Unbounded Gradients and Affine Variance [46.15915820243487]
  We show that AdaGrad-Norm exhibits an order optimal convergence of $mathcalOleft. We show that AdaGrad-Norm exhibits an order optimal convergence of $mathcalOleft.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-11T17:37:54Z)
• STORM+: Fully Adaptive SGD with Momentum for Nonconvex Optimization [74.1615979057429]
  We investigate non-batch optimization problems where the objective is an expectation over smooth loss functions. Our work builds on the STORM algorithm, in conjunction with a novel approach to adaptively set the learning rate and momentum parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T15:43:36Z)
• High Probability Complexity Bounds for Non-Smooth Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise [51.31435087414348]
  It is essential to theoretically guarantee that algorithms provide small objective residual with high probability. Existing methods for non-smooth convex optimization have complexity bounds with dependence on confidence level. We propose novel stepsize rules for two methods with gradient clipping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T17:54:21Z)
• Implicit differentiation for fast hyperparameter selection in non-smooth convex learning [87.60600646105696]
  We study first-order methods when the inner optimization problem is convex but non-smooth. We show that the forward-mode differentiation of proximal gradient descent and proximal coordinate descent yield sequences of Jacobians converging toward the exact Jacobian.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-04T17:31:28Z)
• Convergence of adaptive algorithms for weakly convex constrained optimization [59.36386973876765]
  We prove the $mathcaltilde O(t-1/4)$ rate of convergence for the norm of the gradient of Moreau envelope. Our analysis works with mini-batch size of $1$, constant first and second order moment parameters, and possibly smooth optimization domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T17:43:19Z)
• On the Convergence of Adaptive Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Optimization [80.03647903934723]
  We prove adaptive gradient methods in expectation of gradient convergence methods. Our analyses shed light on better adaptive gradient methods in optimizing non understanding gradient bounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2018-08-16T20:25:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.