C-ICL: Contrastive In-context Learning for Information Extraction
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11254v2
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:34:56 GMT
- Title: C-ICL: Contrastive In-context Learning for Information Extraction
- Authors: Ying Mo, Jiahao Liu, Jian Yang, Qifan Wang, Shun Zhang, Jingang Wang, Zhoujun Li,
- Abstract summary: c-ICL is a novel few-shot technique that leverages both correct and incorrect sample constructions to create in-context learning demonstrations.
Our experiments on various datasets indicate that c-ICL outperforms previous few-shot in-context learning methods.
- Score: 54.39470114243744
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: There has been increasing interest in exploring the capabilities of advanced large language models (LLMs) in the field of information extraction (IE), specifically focusing on tasks related to named entity recognition (NER) and relation extraction (RE). Although researchers are exploring the use of few-shot information extraction through in-context learning with LLMs, they tend to focus only on using correct or positive examples for demonstration, neglecting the potential value of incorporating incorrect or negative examples into the learning process. In this paper, we present c-ICL, a novel few-shot technique that leverages both correct and incorrect sample constructions to create in-context learning demonstrations. This approach enhances the ability of LLMs to extract entities and relations by utilizing prompts that incorporate not only the positive samples but also the reasoning behind them. This method allows for the identification and correction of potential interface errors. Specifically, our proposed method taps into the inherent contextual information and valuable information in hard negative samples and the nearest positive neighbors to the test and then applies the in-context learning demonstrations based on LLMs. Our experiments on various datasets indicate that c-ICL outperforms previous few-shot in-context learning methods, delivering substantial enhancements in performance across a broad spectrum of related tasks. These improvements are noteworthy, showcasing the versatility of our approach in miscellaneous scenarios.
Related papers
- Enhancing Input-Label Mapping in In-Context Learning with Contrastive Decoding [71.01099784480597]
Large language models (LLMs) excel at a range of tasks through in-context learning (ICL)
We introduce In-Context Contrastive Decoding (ICCD), a novel method that emphasizes input-label mapping.
ICCD emphasizes input-label mapping by contrasting the output distributions between positive and negative in-context examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-19T14:04:46Z) - LLMs Are In-Context Bandit Reinforcement Learners [30.192422586838997]
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at in-context learning (ICL), a supervised learning technique that relies on adding annotated examples to the model context.
We investigate a contextual bandit version of in-context reinforcement learning (ICRL), where models learn in-context, online, from external reward, instead of supervised data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T17:45:00Z) - Evaluating Linguistic Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs in the Lens of Few-Shot Learning [15.919493497867567]
This study aims to evaluate the performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on the VALSE benchmark.
We conducted a comprehensive assessment of state-of-the-art MLLMs, varying in model size and pretraining datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-17T11:26:47Z) - How Does the Textual Information Affect the Retrieval of Multimodal In-Context Learning? [11.374310255084753]
We introduce a novel supervised MLLM-retriever MSIER that employs a neural network to select examples that enhance multimodal in-context learning efficiency.
This approach is validated through extensive testing across three distinct tasks, demonstrating the method's effectiveness.
This exploration paves the way for future advancements, highlighting the potential for refined in-context learning in MLLMs through the strategic use of multimodal data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-19T13:05:37Z) - Uncertainty Quantification for In-Context Learning of Large Language Models [52.891205009620364]
In-context learning has emerged as a groundbreaking ability of Large Language Models (LLMs)
We propose a novel formulation and corresponding estimation method to quantify both types of uncertainties.
The proposed method offers an unsupervised way to understand the prediction of in-context learning in a plug-and-play fashion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T18:46:24Z) - IERL: Interpretable Ensemble Representation Learning -- Combining
CrowdSourced Knowledge and Distributed Semantic Representations [11.008412414253662]
Large Language Models (LLMs) encode meanings of words in the form of distributed semantics.
Recent studies have shown that LLMs tend to generate unintended, inconsistent, or wrong texts as outputs.
We propose a novel ensemble learning method, Interpretable Ensemble Representation Learning (IERL), that systematically combines LLM and crowdsourced knowledge representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-24T05:02:34Z) - Active Learning Principles for In-Context Learning with Large Language
Models [65.09970281795769]
This paper investigates how Active Learning algorithms can serve as effective demonstration selection methods for in-context learning.
We show that in-context example selection through AL prioritizes high-quality examples that exhibit low uncertainty and bear similarity to the test examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T17:16:04Z) - ICL-D3IE: In-Context Learning with Diverse Demonstrations Updating for
Document Information Extraction [56.790794611002106]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable results in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks with in-context learning.
We propose a simple but effective in-context learning framework called ICL-D3IE.
Specifically, we extract the most difficult and distinct segments from hard training documents as hard demonstrations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-09T06:24:50Z) - Combining Feature and Instance Attribution to Detect Artifacts [62.63504976810927]
We propose methods to facilitate identification of training data artifacts.
We show that this proposed training-feature attribution approach can be used to uncover artifacts in training data.
We execute a small user study to evaluate whether these methods are useful to NLP researchers in practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-01T09:26:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.