Reliable LLM-based User Simulator for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13374v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:57:47 GMT
• Title: Reliable LLM-based User Simulator for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems
• Authors: Ivan Sekuli\'c, Silvia Terragni, Victor Guimar\~aes, Nghia Khau, Bruna Guedes, Modestas Filipavicius, Andr\'e Ferreira Manso, Roland Mathis
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces DAUS, a Domain-Aware User Simulator. We fine-tune DAUS on real examples of task-oriented dialogues. Results on two relevant benchmarks showcase significant improvements in terms of user goal fulfillment.
• Score: 2.788542465279969
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the realm of dialogue systems, user simulation techniques have emerged as a game-changer, redefining the evaluation and enhancement of task-oriented dialogue (TOD) systems. These methods are crucial for replicating real user interactions, enabling applications like synthetic data augmentation, error detection, and robust evaluation. However, existing approaches often rely on rigid rule-based methods or on annotated data. This paper introduces DAUS, a Domain-Aware User Simulator. Leveraging large language models, we fine-tune DAUS on real examples of task-oriented dialogues. Results on two relevant benchmarks showcase significant improvements in terms of user goal fulfillment. Notably, we have observed that fine-tuning enhances the simulator's coherence with user goals, effectively mitigating hallucinations -- a major source of inconsistencies in simulator responses.

Related papers

• Simulating Task-Oriented Dialogues with State Transition Graphs and Large Language Models [16.94819621353007]
  SynTOD is a new synthetic data generation approach for developing end-to-end Task-Oriented Dialogue (TOD) systems. It generates diverse, structured conversations through random walks and response simulation using large language models. In our experiments, using graph-guided response simulations leads to significant improvements in intent classification, slot filling and response relevance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T06:23:34Z)
• Unlocking the Potential of User Feedback: Leveraging Large Language Model as User Simulator to Enhance Dialogue System [65.93577256431125]
  We propose an alternative approach called User-Guided Response Optimization (UGRO) to combine it with a smaller task-oriented dialogue model. This approach uses LLM as annotation-free user simulator to assess dialogue responses, combining them with smaller fine-tuned end-to-end TOD models. Our approach outperforms previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T13:04:56Z)
• In-Context Learning User Simulators for Task-Oriented Dialog Systems [1.7086737326992172]
  This paper presents a novel application of large language models in user simulation for task-oriented dialog systems. By harnessing the power of these models, the proposed approach generates diverse utterances based on user goals and limited dialog examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T15:06:11Z)
• Is MultiWOZ a Solved Task? An Interactive TOD Evaluation Framework with User Simulator [37.590563896382456]
  We propose an interactive evaluation framework for Task-Oriented Dialogue (TOD) systems. We first build a goal-oriented user simulator based on pre-trained models and then use the user simulator to interact with the dialogue system to generate dialogues. Experimental results show that RL-based TOD systems trained by our proposed user simulator can achieve nearly 98% inform and success rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T07:41:32Z)
• Metaphorical User Simulators for Evaluating Task-oriented Dialogue Systems [80.77917437785773]
  Task-oriented dialogue systems ( TDSs) are assessed mainly in an offline setting or through human evaluation. We propose a metaphorical user simulator for end-to-end TDS evaluation, where we define a simulator to be metaphorical if it simulates user's analogical thinking in interactions with systems. We also propose a tester-based evaluation framework to generate variants, i.e., dialogue systems with different capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-02T05:11:03Z)
• Towards Automatic Evaluation of Dialog Systems: A Model-Free Off-Policy Evaluation Approach [84.02388020258141]
  We propose a new framework named ENIGMA for estimating human evaluation scores based on off-policy evaluation in reinforcement learning. ENIGMA only requires a handful of pre-collected experience data, and therefore does not involve human interaction with the target policy during the evaluation. Our experiments show that ENIGMA significantly outperforms existing methods in terms of correlation with human evaluation scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-20T03:29:20Z)
• Optimizing Interactive Systems via Data-Driven Objectives [70.3578528542663]
  We propose an approach that infers the objective directly from observed user interactions. These inferences can be made regardless of prior knowledge and across different types of user behavior. We introduce Interactive System (ISO), a novel algorithm that uses these inferred objectives for optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T20:49:14Z)
• Is Your Goal-Oriented Dialog Model Performing Really Well? Empirical Analysis of System-wise Evaluation [114.48767388174218]
  This paper presents an empirical analysis on different types of dialog systems composed of different modules in different settings. Our results show that a pipeline dialog system trained using fine-grained supervision signals at different component levels often obtains better performance than the systems that use joint or end-to-end models trained on coarse-grained labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T05:20:06Z)
• Multi-Agent Task-Oriented Dialog Policy Learning with Role-Aware Reward Decomposition [64.06167416127386]
  We propose Multi-Agent Dialog Policy Learning, which regards both the system and the user as the dialog agents. Two agents interact with each other and are jointly learned simultaneously. Results show that our method can successfully build a system policy and a user policy simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-08T04:51:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.