An Exploratory Analysis of COVID Bot vs Human Disinformation Dissemination stemming from the Disinformation Dozen on Telegram

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14203v1
• Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 01:10:11 GMT
• Title: An Exploratory Analysis of COVID Bot vs Human Disinformation Dissemination stemming from the Disinformation Dozen on Telegram
• Authors: Lynnette Hui Xian Ng, Ian Kloo, Kathleen M. Carley
• Abstract summary: The COVID-19 pandemic of 2021 led to a worldwide health crisis that was accompanied by an infodemic. A group of 12 social media personalities, dubbed the Disinformation Dozen", were identified as key in spreading disinformation regarding the COVID-19 virus, treatments, and vaccines. This study focuses on the spread of disinformation propagated by this group on Telegram, a mobile messaging and social media platform.
• Score: 5.494111035517598
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic of 2021 led to a worldwide health crisis that was accompanied by an infodemic. A group of 12 social media personalities, dubbed the ``Disinformation Dozen", were identified as key in spreading disinformation regarding the COVID-19 virus, treatments, and vaccines. This study focuses on the spread of disinformation propagated by this group on Telegram, a mobile messaging and social media platform. After segregating users into three groups -- the Disinformation Dozen, bots, and humans --, we perform an investigation with a dataset of Telegram messages from January to June 2023, comparatively analyzing temporal, topical, and network features. We observe that the Disinformation Dozen are highly involved in the initial dissemination of disinformation but are not the main drivers of the propagation of disinformation. Bot users are extremely active in conversation threads, while human users are active propagators of information, disseminating posts between Telegram channels through the forwarding mechanism.

Related papers

• InfoPattern: Unveiling Information Propagation Patterns in Social Media [59.67008841974645]
  InfoPattern centers on the interplay between language and human ideology. The demo is capable of: (1) red teaming to simulate adversary responses from opposite ideology communities; (2) stance detection to identify the underlying political sentiments in each message; (3) information propagation graph discovery to reveal the evolution of claims across various communities over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T09:12:35Z)
• ManiTweet: A New Benchmark for Identifying Manipulation of News on Social Media [74.93847489218008]
  We present a novel task, identifying manipulation of news on social media, which aims to detect manipulation in social media posts and identify manipulated or inserted information. To study this task, we have proposed a data collection schema and curated a dataset called ManiTweet, consisting of 3.6K pairs of tweets and corresponding articles. Our analysis demonstrates that this task is highly challenging, with large language models (LLMs) yielding unsatisfactory performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:40:07Z)
• TGDataset: a Collection of Over One Hundred Thousand Telegram Channels [69.22187804798162]
  This paper presents the TGDataset, a new dataset that includes 120,979 Telegram channels and over 400 million messages. We analyze the languages spoken within our dataset and the topic covered by English channels. In addition to the raw dataset, we released the scripts we used to analyze the dataset and the list of channels belonging to the network of a new conspiracy theory called Sabmyk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T15:42:38Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Cross-lingual COVID-19 Fake News Detection [54.125563009333995]
  We make the first attempt to detect COVID-19 misinformation in a low-resource language (Chinese) only using the fact-checked news in a high-resource language (English) We propose a deep learning framework named CrossFake to jointly encode the cross-lingual news body texts and capture the news content. Empirical results on our dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of CrossFake under the cross-lingual setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T04:44:02Z)
• The State of Infodemic on Twitter [0.0]
  Social media posts and platforms are at risk of rumors and misinformation in the face of the serious uncertainty surrounding the virus itself. We have presented an exploratory analysis of the tweets and the users who are involved in spreading misinformation. We then delved into machine learning models and natural language processing techniques to identify if a tweet contains misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T10:58:35Z)
• Social Media COVID-19 Misinformation Interventions Viewed Positively, But Have Limited Impact [16.484676698355884]
  Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter rolled out design interventions, including banners linking to authoritative resources and more specific "false information" labels. We found that most participants indicated a positive attitude towards interventions, particularly post-specific labels for misinformation. Still, the majority of participants discovered or corrected misinformation through other means, most commonly web searches, suggesting room for platforms to do more to stem the spread of COVID-19 misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T00:02:04Z)
• "Thought I'd Share First" and Other Conspiracy Theory Tweets from the COVID-19 Infodemic: Exploratory Study [0.0]
  Health-related misinformation threatens adherence to public health messaging. Monitoring misinformation on social media is critical to understanding the evolution of ideas that have potentially negative public health impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T17:24:59Z)
• Characterizing the roles of bots during the COVID-19 infodemic on Twitter [1.776746672434207]
  An infodemic is an emerging phenomenon caused by an overabundance of information online. We examined the roles of bots in the case of the COVID-19 infodemic and the diffusion of non-credible information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-12T08:04:32Z)
• COVID-19 on Social Media: Analyzing Misinformation in Twitter Conversations [22.43295864610142]
  We collected streaming data related to COVID-19 using the Twitter API, starting March 1, 2020. We identified unreliable and misleading contents based on fact-checking sources. We examined the narratives promoted in misinformation tweets, along with the distribution of engagements with these tweets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T09:48:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.