Stick to your Role! Stability of Personal Values Expressed in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14846v4
• Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 14:04:05 GMT
• Title: Stick to your Role! Stability of Personal Values Expressed in Large Language Models
• Authors: Grgur Kovač, Rémy Portelas, Masataka Sawayama, Peter Ford Dominey, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,
• Abstract summary: We present a case-study on the stability of value expression over different contexts. Reusing methods from psychology, we study Rank-order stability on the population. We observe consistent trends in the stability of models and model families.
• Score: 19.516125296160638
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The standard way to study Large Language Models (LLMs) with benchmarks or psychology questionnaires is to provide many different queries from similar minimal contexts (e.g. multiple choice questions). However, due to LLMs' highly context-dependent nature, conclusions from such minimal-context evaluations may be little informative about the model's behavior in deployment (where it will be exposed to many new contexts). We argue that context-dependence (specifically, value stability) should be studied as a specific property of LLMs and used as another dimension of LLM comparison (alongside others such as cognitive abilities, knowledge, or model size). We present a case-study on the stability of value expression over different contexts (simulated conversations on different topics) as measured using a standard psychology questionnaire (PVQ) and on behavioral downstream tasks. Reusing methods from psychology, we study Rank-order stability on the population (interpersonal) level, and Ipsative stability on the individual (intrapersonal) level. We consider two settings (with and without instructing LLMs to simulate particular personas), two simulated populations, and three downstream tasks. We observe consistent trends in the stability of models and model families - Mixtral, Mistral, GPT-3.5 and Qwen families are more stable than LLaMa-2 and Phi. The consistency of these trends implies that some models exhibit higher value stability than others, and that stability can be estimated with the set of introduced methodological tools. When instructed to simulate particular personas, LLMs exhibit low Rank-order stability, which further diminishes with conversation length. This highlights the need for future research on LLMs that coherently simulate different personas. This paper provides a foundational step in that direction, and, to our knowledge, it is the first study of value stability in LLMs.

Related papers

• If an LLM Were a Character, Would It Know Its Own Story? Evaluating Lifelong Learning in LLMs [55.8331366739144]
  We introduce LIFESTATE-BENCH, a benchmark designed to assess lifelong learning in large language models (LLMs) Our fact checking evaluation probes models' self-awareness, episodic memory retrieval, and relationship tracking, across both parametric and non-parametric approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T16:50:57Z)
• LIFBench: Evaluating the Instruction Following Performance and Stability of Large Language Models in Long-Context Scenarios [16.72802527902692]
  We introduce the Long-context Instruction-Following Benchmark (LIFBench), a scalable dataset designed to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) LIFBench comprises three long-context scenarios and eleven diverse tasks, supported by 2,766 instructions generated through an automated expansion method across three dimensions: length, expression, and variables. For evaluation, we propose LIFEval, a rubric-based assessment framework that provides precise, automated scoring of complex LLM responses without relying on LLM-assisted evaluations or human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T14:43:51Z)
• Unconditional Truthfulness: Learning Conditional Dependency for Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models [96.43562963756975]
  We train a regression model, which target variable is the gap between the conditional and the unconditional generation confidence. We use this learned conditional dependency model to modulate the uncertainty of the current generation step based on the uncertainty of the previous step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T09:42:26Z)
• Political Compass or Spinning Arrow? Towards More Meaningful Evaluations for Values and Opinions in Large Language Models [61.45529177682614]
  We challenge the prevailing constrained evaluation paradigm for values and opinions in large language models. We show that models give substantively different answers when not forced. We distill these findings into recommendations and open challenges in evaluating values and opinions in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T18:00:49Z)
• Identifying Multiple Personalities in Large Language Models with External Evaluation [6.657168333238573]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are integrated with human daily applications rapidly. Many recent studies quantify LLMs' personalities using self-assessment tests that are created for humans. Yet many critiques question the applicability and reliability of these self-assessment tests when applied to LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T18:57:20Z)
• Evaluating and Improving Continual Learning in Spoken Language Understanding [58.723320551761525]
  We propose an evaluation methodology that provides a unified evaluation on stability, plasticity, and generalizability in continual learning. By employing the proposed metric, we demonstrate how introducing various knowledge distillations can improve different aspects of these three properties of the SLU model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T03:30:27Z)
• You don't need a personality test to know these models are unreliable: Assessing the Reliability of Large Language Models on Psychometric Instruments [37.03210795084276]
  We examine whether the current format of prompting Large Language Models elicits responses in a consistent and robust manner. Our experiments on 17 different LLMs reveal that even simple perturbations significantly downgrade a model's question-answering ability. Our results suggest that the currently widespread practice of prompting is insufficient to accurately and reliably capture model perceptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T09:50:53Z)
• Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
  We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools. Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions. Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z)
• Large Language Models as Superpositions of Cultural Perspectives [25.114678091641935]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are often misleadingly recognized as having a personality or a set of values. We argue that an LLM can be seen as a superposition of perspectives with different values and personality traits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-15T19:04:33Z)
• Revisiting Out-of-distribution Robustness in NLP: Benchmark, Analysis, and LLMs Evaluations [111.88727295707454]
  This paper reexamines the research on out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness in the field of NLP. We propose a benchmark construction protocol that ensures clear differentiation and challenging distribution shifts. We conduct experiments on pre-trained language models for analysis and evaluation of OOD robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T17:47:03Z)
• Personality testing of Large Language Models: Limited temporal stability, but highlighted prosociality [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to gain popularity due to their human-like traits and the intimacy they offer to users. This study aimed to assess the temporal stability and inter-rater agreement on their responses on personality instruments in two time points. The findings revealed varying levels of inter-rater agreement in the LLMs responses over a short time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T10:14:17Z)
• Revisiting the Reliability of Psychological Scales on Large Language Models [62.57981196992073]
  This study aims to determine the reliability of applying personality assessments to Large Language Models. Analysis of 2,500 settings per model, including GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Gemini-Pro, and LLaMA-3.1, reveals that various LLMs show consistency in responses to the Big Five Inventory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T15:03:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.