Fine-Grained Detoxification via Instance-Level Prefixes for Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15202v2
• Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 02:37:15 GMT
• Title: Fine-Grained Detoxification via Instance-Level Prefixes for Large Language Models
• Authors: Xin Yi and Linlin Wang and Xiaoling Wang and Liang He
• Abstract summary: Fine-grained detoxification via instance-level prefixes (FGDILP) to mitigate toxic text without additional cost. FGDILP contrasts the contextualized representation in attention space using a positive prefix-prepended prompt. We validate that FGDILP enables controlled text generation with regard to toxicity at both the utterance and context levels.
• Score: 26.474136481185724
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Impressive results have been achieved in natural language processing (NLP) tasks through the training of large language models (LLMs). However, these models occasionally produce toxic content such as insults, threats, and profanity in response to certain prompts, thereby constraining their practical utility. To tackle this issue, various finetuning-based and decoding-based approaches have been utilized to mitigate toxicity. However, these methods typically necessitate additional costs such as high-quality training data or auxiliary models. In this paper, we propose fine-grained detoxification via instance-level prefixes (FGDILP) to mitigate toxic text without additional cost. Specifically, FGDILP contrasts the contextualized representation in attention space using a positive prefix-prepended prompt against multiple negative prefix-prepended prompts at the instance level. This allows for constructing fine-grained subtoxicity vectors, which enables collaborative detoxification by fusing them to correct the normal generation process when provided with a raw prompt. We validate that FGDILP enables controlled text generation with regard to toxicity at both the utterance and context levels. Our method surpasses prompt-based baselines in detoxification, although at a slight cost to generation fluency and diversity.

Related papers

• Toxic Subword Pruning for Dialogue Response Generation on Large Language Models [51.713448010799986]
  We propose textbfToxic Subword textbfPruning (ToxPrune) to prune the subword contained by the toxic words from BPE in trained LLMs. ToxPrune simultaneously improves the toxic language model NSFW-3B on the task of dialogue response generation obviously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T13:30:33Z)
• Mitigating Text Toxicity with Counterfactual Generation [0.3250512744763586]
  Toxicity mitigation consists in rephrasing text in order to remove harmful meaning. Current methods fail to detoxify text while preserving the initial non-toxic meaning. This work is the first to bridge the gap between counterfactual generation and text detoxification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T09:52:21Z)
• Parameter-Efficient Detoxification with Contrastive Decoding [78.5124331048714]
  We introduce Detoxification Generator (DETOXIGEN), an inference-time algorithm that steers the generation away from unwanted styles. During the actual generation, we use the trained detoxifier to produce undesirable tokens for the generator to contrast against at each decoding step. We find that it significantly outperforms previous approaches in detoxification metrics while not compromising on the generation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T01:46:20Z)
• Self-Detoxifying Language Models via Toxification Reversal [11.238212967733165]
  Language model detoxification aims to minimize the risk of generating offensive or harmful content in pretrained language models (PLMs) We propose a more lightweight approach that enables the PLM itself to achieve "self-detoxification" Our method is built upon the observation that prepending a negative steering prompt can effectively induce PLMs to generate toxic content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T12:51:38Z)
• Language Model Detoxification in Dialogue with Contextualized Stance Control [18.30723730898435]
  Previous work on Language Model detoxification has focused on reducing the toxicity of the generation itself (self-toxicity) without consideration of the context. We propose a novel control method to do context-dependent detoxification with the stance taken into consideration. Experimental results show that our proposed method can effectively learn the context-dependent stance control strategies while keeping a low self-toxicity of the underlying LM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T00:47:28Z)
• Language Detoxification with Attribute-Discriminative Latent Space [59.167432249229584]
  Transformer-based Language Models (LMs) have achieved impressive results on natural language understanding tasks. They can also generate toxic text such as insults, threats, and profanity, limiting their real-world applications. We propose an effective yet efficient method for language detoxification using an attribute-discriminative latent space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T06:54:42Z)
• Leashing the Inner Demons: Self-Detoxification for Language Models [13.576289320208511]
  Language models (LMs) can reproduce (or amplify) toxic language seen during training. We analyze the impact of prompts, decoding strategies and training corpora on the output. We propose a simple yet effective method for language models to "detoxify" themselves without an additional large corpus or external discriminator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-06T23:55:12Z)
• Challenges in Automated Debiasing for Toxic Language Detection [81.04406231100323]
  Biased associations have been a challenge in the development of classifiers for detecting toxic language. We investigate recently introduced debiasing methods for text classification datasets and models, as applied to toxic language detection. Our focus is on lexical (e.g., swear words, slurs, identity mentions) and dialectal markers (specifically African American English)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-29T22:03:17Z)
• RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models [93.151822563361]
  Pretrained neural language models (LMs) are prone to generating racist, sexist, or otherwise toxic language which hinders their safe deployment. We investigate the extent to which pretrained LMs can be prompted to generate toxic language, and the effectiveness of controllable text generation algorithms at preventing such toxic degeneration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-24T03:17:19Z)
• Contextualized Perturbation for Textual Adversarial Attack [56.370304308573274]
  Adversarial examples expose the vulnerabilities of natural language processing (NLP) models. This paper presents CLARE, a ContextuaLized AdversaRial Example generation model that produces fluent and grammatical outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T06:53:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.