Is Offline Decision Making Possible with Only Few Samples? Reliable Decisions in Data-Starved Bandits via Trust Region Enhancement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15703v1
• Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 03:41:09 GMT
• Title: Is Offline Decision Making Possible with Only Few Samples? Reliable Decisions in Data-Starved Bandits via Trust Region Enhancement
• Authors: Ruiqi Zhang, Yuexiang Zhai, Andrea Zanette
• Abstract summary: We show that even in a data-starved setting it may still be possible to find a policy competitive with the optimal one. This paves the way to reliable decision-making in settings where critical decisions must be made by relying only on a handful of samples.
• Score: 25.68354404229254
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: What can an agent learn in a stochastic Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) problem from a dataset that contains just a single sample for each arm? Surprisingly, in this work, we demonstrate that even in such a data-starved setting it may still be possible to find a policy competitive with the optimal one. This paves the way to reliable decision-making in settings where critical decisions must be made by relying only on a handful of samples. Our analysis reveals that \emph{stochastic policies can be substantially better} than deterministic ones for offline decision-making. Focusing on offline multi-armed bandits, we design an algorithm called Trust Region of Uncertainty for Stochastic policy enhancemenT (TRUST) which is quite different from the predominant value-based lower confidence bound approach. Its design is enabled by localization laws, critical radii, and relative pessimism. We prove that its sample complexity is comparable to that of LCB on minimax problems while being substantially lower on problems with very few samples. Finally, we consider an application to offline reinforcement learning in the special case where the logging policies are known.

Related papers

• Off-Policy Evaluation in Markov Decision Processes under Weak Distributional Overlap [5.0401589279256065]
  We re-visit the task of off-policy evaluation in Markov decision processes (MDPs) under a weaker notion of distributional overlap. We introduce a class of truncated doubly robust (TDR) estimators which we find to perform well in this setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T03:55:56Z)
• Best Arm Identification with Fixed Budget: A Large Deviation Perspective [54.305323903582845]
  We present sred, a truly adaptive algorithm that can reject arms in it any round based on the observed empirical gaps between the rewards of various arms. In particular, we present sred, a truly adaptive algorithm that can reject arms in it any round based on the observed empirical gaps between the rewards of various arms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T13:17:43Z)
• Distributionally Robust Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity [39.886149789339335]
  offline reinforcement learning aims to learn to perform decision making from history data without active exploration. Due to uncertainties and variabilities of the environment, it is critical to learn a robust policy that performs well even when the deployed environment deviates from the nominal one used to collect the history dataset. We consider a distributionally robust formulation of offline RL, focusing on robust Markov decision processes with an uncertainty set specified by the Kullback-Leibler divergence in both finite-horizon and infinite-horizon settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T11:55:31Z)
• Byzantine-Robust Online and Offline Distributed Reinforcement Learning [60.970950468309056]
  We consider a distributed reinforcement learning setting where multiple agents explore the environment and communicate their experiences through a central server. $alpha$-fraction of agents are adversarial and can report arbitrary fake information. We seek to identify a near-optimal policy for the underlying Markov decision process in the presence of these adversarial agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T00:44:53Z)
• Sparse Feature Selection Makes Batch Reinforcement Learning More Sample Efficient [62.24615324523435]
  This paper provides a statistical analysis of high-dimensional batch Reinforcement Learning (RL) using sparse linear function approximation. When there is a large number of candidate features, our result sheds light on the fact that sparsity-aware methods can make batch RL more sample efficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-08T16:48:02Z)
• What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation? [70.33301077240763]
  offline reinforcement learning seeks to utilize offline (observational) data to guide the learning of sequential decision making strategies. This work focuses on the basic question of what are necessary representational and distributional conditions that permit provable sample-efficient offline reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T17:32:13Z)
• Latent Bandits Revisited [55.88616813182679]
  A latent bandit problem is one in which the learning agent knows the arm reward distributions conditioned on an unknown discrete latent state. We propose general algorithms for this setting, based on both upper confidence bounds (UCBs) and Thompson sampling. We provide a unified theoretical analysis of our algorithms, which have lower regret than classic bandit policies when the number of latent states is smaller than actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T19:24:02Z)
• The Simulator: Understanding Adaptive Sampling in the Moderate-Confidence Regime [52.38455827779212]
  We propose a novel technique for analyzing adaptive sampling called the em Simulator. We prove the first instance-based lower bounds the top-k problem which incorporate the appropriate log-factors. Our new analysis inspires a simple and near-optimal for the best-arm and top-k identification, the first em practical of its kind for the latter problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2017-02-16T23:42:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.