LLMs with Chain-of-Thought Are Non-Causal Reasoners
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16048v1
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 10:13:04 GMT
- Title: LLMs with Chain-of-Thought Are Non-Causal Reasoners
- Authors: Guangsheng Bao, Hongbo Zhang, Linyi Yang, Cunxiang Wang, Yue Zhang
- Abstract summary: We employ causal analysis to assess the cause-effect relationship between CoTs/instructions and answers in Large Language Models.
By comparing the implied SCM with that of human reasoning, we highlight discrepancies between LLM and human reasoning processes.
In-context learning, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning on human feedback significantly impact the causal relations.
- Score: 34.18612597843633
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper explores the role of the Chain of Thought (CoT) in Large Language
Models (LLMs) reasoning. Despite its potential to improve task performance, our
analysis reveals a surprising frequency of correct answers following incorrect
CoTs and vice versa. We employ causal analysis to assess the cause-effect
relationship between CoTs/instructions and answers in LLMs, uncovering the
Structural Causal Model (SCM) that LLMs approximate. By comparing the implied
SCM with that of human reasoning, we highlight discrepancies between LLM and
human reasoning processes. We further examine the factors influencing the
causal structure of the implied SCM, revealing that in-context learning,
supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning on human feedback
significantly impact the causal relations. We release the code and results at
https://github.com/StevenZHB/CoT_Causal_Analysis.
Related papers
- Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage? [62.17959154852391]
Causal reasoning capability is critical in advancing large language models toward strong artificial intelligence.<n>We show that large language models (LLMs) are only capable of performing shallow (level-1) causal reasoning.<n>We propose G2-Reasoner, a method that incorporates general knowledge and goal-oriented prompts into LLMs' causal reasoning processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-26T13:11:01Z) - Misaligning Reasoning with Answers -- A Framework for Assessing LLM CoT Robustness [3.9930400744726273]
We design a novel evaluation framework, MATCHA, to investigate the relationship between answer and reasoning.<n>In domains like education and healthcare, reasoning is key for model trustworthiness.<n>Our results show that LLMs exhibit greater vulnerability to input perturbations for multi-step and commonsense tasks than compared to logical tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-23T02:42:16Z) - Failure Modes of LLMs for Causal Reasoning on Narratives [51.19592551510628]
We investigate the causal reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) through the representative problem of inferring causal relationships from narratives.
We find that even state-of-the-art language models rely on unreliable shortcuts, both in terms of the narrative presentation and their parametric knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T12:48:58Z) - Improving Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey [16.55801836321059]
Causal reasoning is a crucial aspect of intelligence, essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and understanding the world.
Large language models (LLMs) can generate rationales for their outputs, but their ability to reliably perform causal reasoning remains uncertain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-22T04:18:19Z) - Make LLMs better zero-shot reasoners: Structure-orientated autonomous reasoning [52.83539473110143]
We introduce a novel structure-oriented analysis method to help Large Language Models (LLMs) better understand a question.
To further improve the reliability in complex question-answering tasks, we propose a multi-agent reasoning system, Structure-oriented Autonomous Reasoning Agents (SARA)
Extensive experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed reasoning system. Surprisingly, in some cases, the system even surpasses few-shot methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T05:30:33Z) - Not All LLM Reasoners Are Created Equal [58.236453890457476]
We study the depth of grade-school math problem-solving capabilities of LLMs.
We evaluate their performance on pairs of existing math word problems together.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T17:01:10Z) - CSCE: Boosting LLM Reasoning by Simultaneous Enhancing of Casual Significance and Consistency [12.961692839965115]
Chain-based reasoning methods like chain of thought (CoT) play a rising role in solving reasoning tasks for large language models (LLMs)
This paper proposes a non-chain-based reasoning framework for simultaneous consideration of causal significance and consistency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-20T08:28:23Z) - From Pre-training Corpora to Large Language Models: What Factors Influence LLM Performance in Causal Discovery Tasks? [51.42906577386907]
This study explores the factors influencing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in causal discovery tasks.
A higher frequency of causal mentions correlates with better model performance, suggesting that extensive exposure to causal information during training enhances the models' causal discovery capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T01:45:05Z) - A Systematic Analysis of Large Language Models as Soft Reasoners: The Case of Syllogistic Inferences [5.141416267381492]
We consider the case of syllogistic reasoning, an area of deductive reasoning studied extensively in logic and cognitive psychology.
We investigate the effects of chain-of-thought reasoning, in-context learning, and supervised fine-tuning on syllogistic reasoning.
Our results suggest that the behavior of pre-trained LLMs can be explained by cognitive science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T08:59:04Z) - CausalBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Causal Learning Capability of LLMs [27.362012903540492]
The ability to understand causality significantly impacts the competence of large language models (LLMs) in output explanation and counterfactual reasoning.
The ability to understand causality significantly impacts the competence of large language models (LLMs) in output explanation and counterfactual reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-09T14:40:08Z) - CausalGym: Benchmarking causal interpretability methods on linguistic
tasks [52.61917615039112]
We use CausalGym to benchmark the ability of interpretability methods to causally affect model behaviour.
We study the pythia models (14M--6.9B) and assess the causal efficacy of a wide range of interpretability methods.
We find that DAS outperforms the other methods, and so we use it to study the learning trajectory of two difficult linguistic phenomena.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T21:35:56Z) - Direct Evaluation of Chain-of-Thought in Multi-hop Reasoning with Knowledge Graphs [52.42505579545893]
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning abilities when prompted to generate chain-of-thought explanations alongside answers.
We propose a novel discriminative and generative CoT evaluation paradigm to assess LLMs' knowledge of reasoning and the accuracy of the generated CoT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-17T05:22:56Z) - Concise and Organized Perception Facilitates Reasoning in Large Language Models [32.71672086718057]
We show that large language models (LLMs) exhibit failure patterns akin to human-like cognitive biases when dealing with disordered and irrelevant content in reasoning tasks.
We propose a novel reasoning approach named Concise and Organized Perception (COP)
COP carefully analyzes the given statements to identify the most pertinent information while eliminating redundancy efficiently.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T04:47:49Z) - Towards LogiGLUE: A Brief Survey and A Benchmark for Analyzing Logical Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models [56.34029644009297]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to overcome various limitations of formal Knowledge Representation (KR) systems.
LLMs excel most in abductive reasoning, followed by deductive reasoning, while they are least effective at inductive reasoning.
We study single-task training, multi-task training, and "chain-of-thought" knowledge distillation fine-tuning technique to assess the performance of model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T01:00:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.