Benchmarking LLMs on the Semantic Overlap Summarization Task

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17008v1
• Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 20:33:50 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking LLMs on the Semantic Overlap Summarization Task
• Authors: John Salvador, Naman Bansal, Mousumi Akter, Souvika Sarkar, Anupam Das, and Shubhra Kanti Karmaker ("Santu")
• Abstract summary: This paper comprehensively evaluates Large Language Models (LLMs) on the Semantic Overlap Summarization (SOS) task. We report well-established metrics like ROUGE, BERTscore, and SEM-F1$ on two different datasets of alternative narratives.
• Score: 9.656095701778975
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Semantic Overlap Summarization (SOS) is a constrained multi-document summarization task, where the constraint is to capture the common/overlapping information between two alternative narratives. While recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved superior performance in numerous summarization tasks, a benchmarking study of the SOS task using LLMs is yet to be performed. As LLMs' responses are sensitive to slight variations in prompt design, a major challenge in conducting such a benchmarking study is to systematically explore a variety of prompts before drawing a reliable conclusion. Fortunately, very recently, the TELeR taxonomy has been proposed which can be used to design and explore various prompts for LLMs. Using this TELeR taxonomy and 15 popular LLMs, this paper comprehensively evaluates LLMs on the SOS Task, assessing their ability to summarize overlapping information from multiple alternative narratives. For evaluation, we report well-established metrics like ROUGE, BERTscore, and SEM-F1$ on two different datasets of alternative narratives. We conclude the paper by analyzing the strengths and limitations of various LLMs in terms of their capabilities in capturing overlapping information The code and datasets used to conduct this study are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/llm_eval-E16D.

Related papers

• Beyond Isolated Dots: Benchmarking Structured Table Construction as Deep Knowledge Extraction [80.88654868264645]
  Arranged and Organized Extraction Benchmark designed to evaluate ability of large language models to comprehend fragmented documents.<n>AOE includes 11 carefully crafted tasks across three diverse domains, requiring models to generate context-specific schema tailored to varied input queries.<n>Results show that even the most advanced models struggled significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T06:37:51Z)
• An Evaluation of Large Language Models on Text Summarization Tasks Using Prompt Engineering Techniques [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance natural language processing with their ability to generate human-like text.<n>We present a systematic evaluation of six LLMs across four datasets: CNN/Daily Mail and NewsRoom (news), SAMSum (dialog), and ArXiv (scientific)<n>Our study evaluates the performance using the ROUGE and BERTScore metrics.<n>For Long documents, introduce a sentence-based chunking strategy that enables LLMs with shorter context windows to summarize extended inputs in multiple stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T15:34:05Z)
• Can LLMs Generate Tabular Summaries of Science Papers? Rethinking the Evaluation Protocol [83.90769864167301]
  Literature review tables are essential for summarizing and comparing collections of scientific papers. We explore the task of generating tables that best fulfill a user's informational needs given a collection of scientific papers. Our contributions focus on three key challenges encountered in real-world use: (i) User prompts are often under-specified; (ii) Retrieved candidate papers frequently contain irrelevant content; and (iii) Task evaluation should move beyond shallow text similarity techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T14:52:28Z)
• How good is my story? Towards quantitative metrics for evaluating LLM-generated XAI narratives [0.0]
  A rapidly developing application of LLMs in XAI is to convert quantitative explanations into user-friendly narratives. We propose a framework and explore several automated metrics to evaluate LLM-generated narratives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T15:45:45Z)
• Scaling Up Summarization: Leveraging Large Language Models for Long Text Extractive Summarization [0.27624021966289597]
  This paper introduces EYEGLAXS, a framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for extractive summarization. EYEGLAXS focuses on extractive summarization to ensure factual and grammatical integrity. The system sets new performance benchmarks on well-known datasets like PubMed and ArXiv.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T13:52:19Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Models [50.36636396660163]
  We present DiscoveryBench, the first comprehensive benchmark that formalizes the multi-step process of data-driven discovery. Our benchmark contains 264 tasks collected across 6 diverse domains, such as sociology and engineering. Our benchmark, thus, illustrates the challenges in autonomous data-driven discovery and serves as a valuable resource for the community to make progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T18:58:22Z)
• RepEval: Effective Text Evaluation with LLM Representation [55.26340302485898]
  RepEval is a metric that leverages the projection of Large Language Models (LLMs) representations for evaluation. Our work underscores the richness of information regarding text quality embedded within LLM representations, offering insights for the development of new metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T13:50:55Z)
• Unsupervised Information Refinement Training of Large Language Models for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [128.01050030936028]
  We propose an information refinement training method named InFO-RAG. InFO-RAG is low-cost and general across various tasks. It improves the performance of LLaMA2 by an average of 9.39% relative points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T08:24:38Z)
• Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Models [59.930513259982725]
  We introduce a novel and simple method for obtaining high-quality text embeddings using only synthetic data and less than 1k training steps. We leverage proprietary LLMs to generate diverse synthetic data for hundreds of thousands of text embedding tasks across 93 languages. Experiments demonstrate that our method achieves strong performance on highly competitive text embedding benchmarks without using any labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T02:13:18Z)
• TRACE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Continual Learning in Large Language Models [52.734140807634624]
  Aligned large language models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional capabilities in task-solving, following instructions, and ensuring safety. Existing continual learning benchmarks lack sufficient challenge for leading aligned LLMs. We introduce TRACE, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate continual learning in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T16:38:49Z)
• Revisiting Large Language Models as Zero-shot Relation Extractors [8.953462875381888]
  Relation extraction (RE) consistently involves a certain degree of labeled or unlabeled data even if under zero-shot setting. Recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) transfer well to new tasks out-of-the-box simply given a natural language prompt. This work focuses on the study of exploring LLMs as zero-shot relation extractors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T06:17:39Z)
• Embrace Divergence for Richer Insights: A Multi-document Summarization Benchmark and a Case Study on Summarizing Diverse Information from News Articles [136.84278943588652]
  We propose a new task of summarizing diverse information encountered in multiple news articles encompassing the same event. To facilitate this task, we outlined a data collection schema for identifying diverse information and curated a dataset named DiverseSumm. The dataset includes 245 news stories, with each story comprising 10 news articles and paired with a human-validated reference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-17T20:28:17Z)
• Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review [34.12458948051519]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly impacted numerous domains, including Software Engineering (SE) We select and analyze 395 research papers from January 2017 to January 2024 to answer four key research questions (RQs) From the answers to these RQs, we discuss the current state-of-the-art and trends, identifying gaps in existing research, and flagging promising areas for future study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T10:37:49Z)
• Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
  This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks. We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z)
• Element-aware Summarization with Large Language Models: Expert-aligned Evaluation and Chain-of-Thought Method [35.181659789684545]
  Automatic summarization generates concise summaries that contain key ideas of source documents. References from CNN/DailyMail and BBC XSum are noisy, mainly in terms of factual hallucination and information redundancy. We propose a Summary Chain-of-Thought (SumCoT) technique to elicit LLMs to generate summaries step by step. Experimental results show our method outperforms state-of-the-art fine-tuned PLMs and zero-shot LLMs by +4.33/+4.77 in ROUGE-L.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T18:54:35Z)
• LMGQS: A Large-scale Dataset for Query-focused Summarization [77.6179359525065]
  We convert four generic summarization benchmarks into a new QFS benchmark dataset, LMGQS. We establish baselines with state-of-the-art summarization models. We achieve state-of-the-art zero-shot and supervised performance on multiple existing QFS benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T14:53:45Z)
• Multi-Narrative Semantic Overlap Task: Evaluation and Benchmark [4.303515688770516]
  This paper introduces an important yet relatively unexplored NLP task called Multi-Narrative Semantic Overlap (MNSO) We created one by crawling 2,925 narrative pairs from the web and then, went through the tedious process of manually creating 411 different ground-truth semantic overlaps by engaging human annotators. We formulate a new precision-recall style evaluation metric, called SEM-F1 (semantic F1) Experimental results show that the proposed SEM-F1 metric yields higher correlation with human judgement as well as higher inter-rater-agreement compared to ROUGE metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T03:56:41Z)
• HowSumm: A Multi-Document Summarization Dataset Derived from WikiHow Articles [8.53502615629675]
  We present HowSumm, a novel large-scale dataset for the task of query-focused multi-document summarization (qMDS) This use-case is different from the use-cases covered in existing multi-document summarization (MDS) datasets and is applicable to educational and industrial scenarios. We describe the creation of the dataset and discuss the unique features that distinguish it from other summarization corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T04:44:32Z)
• WSL-DS: Weakly Supervised Learning with Distant Supervision for Query Focused Multi-Document Abstractive Summarization [16.048329028104643]
  In the Query Focused Multi-Document Summarization (QF-MDS) task, a set of documents and a query are given where the goal is to generate a summary from these documents. One major challenge for this task is the lack of availability of labeled training datasets. We propose a novel weakly supervised learning approach via utilizing distant supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T02:02:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.