Evaluating Text-to-Image Generative Models: An Empirical Study on Human Image Synthesis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05125v2
• Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 09:53:39 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Text-to-Image Generative Models: An Empirical Study on Human Image Synthesis
• Authors: Muxi Chen, Yi Liu, Jian Yi, Changran Xu, Qiuxia Lai, Hongliang Wang, Tsung-Yi Ho, Qiang Xu,
• Abstract summary: We present an empirical study introducing a nuanced evaluation framework for text-to-image (T2I) generative models. Our framework categorizes evaluations into two distinct groups: first, focusing on image qualities such as aesthetics and realism, and second, examining text conditions through concept coverage and fairness.
• Score: 21.619269792415903
• License:
• Abstract: In this paper, we present an empirical study introducing a nuanced evaluation framework for text-to-image (T2I) generative models, applied to human image synthesis. Our framework categorizes evaluations into two distinct groups: first, focusing on image qualities such as aesthetics and realism, and second, examining text conditions through concept coverage and fairness. We introduce an innovative aesthetic score prediction model that assesses the visual appeal of generated images and unveils the first dataset marked with low-quality regions in generated human images to facilitate automatic defect detection. Our exploration into concept coverage probes the model's effectiveness in interpreting and rendering text-based concepts accurately, while our analysis of fairness reveals biases in model outputs, with an emphasis on gender, race, and age. While our study is grounded in human imagery, this dual-faceted approach is designed with the flexibility to be applicable to other forms of image generation, enhancing our understanding of generative models and paving the way to the next generation of more sophisticated, contextually aware, and ethically attuned generative models. Code and data, including the dataset annotated with defective areas, are available at \href{https://github.com/cure-lab/EvaluateAIGC}{https://github.com/cure-lab/EvaluateAIGC}.

Related papers

• On the Fairness, Diversity and Reliability of Text-to-Image Generative Models [49.60774626839712]
  multimodal generative models have sparked critical discussions on their fairness, reliability, and potential for misuse. We propose an evaluation framework designed to assess model reliability through their responses to perturbations in the embedding space. Our method lays the groundwork for detecting unreliable, bias-injected models and retrieval of bias provenance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T09:46:55Z)
• Image Regeneration: Evaluating Text-to-Image Model via Generating Identical Image with Multimodal Large Language Models [54.052963634384945]
  We introduce the Image Regeneration task to assess text-to-image models. We use GPT4V to bridge the gap between the reference image and the text input for the T2I model. We also present ImageRepainter framework to enhance the quality of generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T13:52:43Z)
• Image2Text2Image: A Novel Framework for Label-Free Evaluation of Image-to-Text Generation with Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [16.00576040281808]
  We propose a novel framework called Image2Text2Image to evaluate image captioning models. A high similarity score suggests that the model has produced a faithful textual description, while a low score highlights discrepancies. Our framework does not rely on human-annotated captions reference, making it a valuable tool for assessing image captioning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T17:07:01Z)
• KITTEN: A Knowledge-Intensive Evaluation of Image Generation on Visual Entities [93.74881034001312]
  We conduct a systematic study on the fidelity of entities in text-to-image generation models. We focus on their ability to generate a wide range of real-world visual entities, such as landmark buildings, aircraft, plants, and animals. Our findings reveal that even the most advanced text-to-image models often fail to generate entities with accurate visual details.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T17:50:37Z)
• Safeguard Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Human Feedback Inversion [51.931083971448885]
  We propose a framework named Human Feedback Inversion (HFI), where human feedback on model-generated images is condensed into textual tokens guiding the mitigation or removal of problematic images. Our experimental results demonstrate our framework significantly reduces objectionable content generation while preserving image quality, contributing to the ethical deployment of AI in the public sphere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T05:21:41Z)
• Reinforcing Pre-trained Models Using Counterfactual Images [54.26310919385808]
  This paper proposes a novel framework to reinforce classification models using language-guided generated counterfactual images. We identify model weaknesses by testing the model using the counterfactual image dataset. We employ the counterfactual images as an augmented dataset to fine-tune and reinforce the classification model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T08:07:14Z)
• Is synthetic data from generative models ready for image recognition? [69.42645602062024]
  We study whether and how synthetic images generated from state-of-the-art text-to-image generation models can be used for image recognition tasks. We showcase the powerfulness and shortcomings of synthetic data from existing generative models, and propose strategies for better applying synthetic data for recognition tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T06:54:24Z)
• Membership Inference Attacks Against Text-to-image Generation Models [23.39695974954703]
  This paper performs the first privacy analysis of text-to-image generation models through the lens of membership inference. We propose three key intuitions about membership information and design four attack methodologies accordingly. All of the proposed attacks can achieve significant performance, in some cases even close to an accuracy of 1, and thus the corresponding risk is much more severe than that shown by existing membership inference attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-03T14:31:39Z)
• Adversarial Text-to-Image Synthesis: A Review [7.593633267653624]
  We contextualize the state of the art of adversarial text-to-image synthesis models, their development since their inception five years ago, and propose a taxonomy based on the level of supervision. We critically examine current strategies to evaluate text-to-image synthesis models, highlight shortcomings, and identify new areas of research, ranging from the development of better datasets and evaluation metrics to possible improvements in architectural design and model training. This review complements previous surveys on generative adversarial networks with a focus on text-to-image synthesis which we believe will help researchers to further advance the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-25T09:58:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.