Simulating Family Conversations using LLMs: Demonstration of Parenting Styles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06144v1
• Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 09:18:43 GMT
• Title: Simulating Family Conversations using LLMs: Demonstration of Parenting Styles
• Authors: Frank Tian-fang Ye (1), Xiaozi Gao (2) ((1) Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, (2) Department of Early Childhood Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR)
• Abstract summary: This study presents a framework for conducting psychological and linguistic research through simulated conversations using large language models (LLMs) The proposed methodology offers significant advantages, particularly for simulating human interactions involving potential unethical language or behaviors.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study presents a framework for conducting psychological and linguistic research through simulated conversations using large language models (LLMs). The proposed methodology offers significant advantages, particularly for simulating human interactions involving potential unethical language or behaviors that would be impermissible in traditional experiments with human participants. As a demonstration, we employed LLMs to simulate family conversations across four parenting styles (authoritarian, authoritative, permissive, and uninvolved). In general, we observed that the characteristics of the four parenting styles were portrayed in the simulated conversations. Several strategies could be used to improve the simulation quality, such as including context awareness, employing a few-shot prompting approach or fine-tuning models to cater to specific simulation requirements. Overall, this study introduces a promising methodology for conducting psychological and linguistic research through simulated conversations, while acknowledging the current limitations and proposing potential solutions for future refinement and improvement.

Related papers

• Large Language Models as Psychological Simulators: A Methodological Guide [0.0]
  This article provides a framework for using large language models as psychological simulators across two primary applications.<n>For simulation, we present methods for developing psychologically grounded personas that move beyond demographic categories.<n>We address overarching challenges including prompt sensitivity, temporal limitations from training data cutoffs, and ethical considerations that extend beyond traditional human subjects review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T02:45:23Z)
• Hypothesis Testing for Quantifying LLM-Human Misalignment in Multiple Choice Settings [7.284860523651357]
  We assess the misalignment between Large Language Models (LLMs)-simulated and actual human behaviors in multiple-choice survey settings.<n>We apply this framework to a popular language model for simulating people's opinions in various public surveys.<n>This raises questions about the alignment of this language model with the tested populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T22:04:55Z)
• Beyond Profile: From Surface-Level Facts to Deep Persona Simulation in LLMs [50.0874045899661]
  We introduce CharacterBot, a model designed to replicate both the linguistic patterns and distinctive thought processes of a character. Using Lu Xun as a case study, we propose four training tasks derived from his 17 essay collections. These include a pre-training task focused on mastering external linguistic structures and knowledge, as well as three fine-tuning tasks. We evaluate CharacterBot on three tasks for linguistic accuracy and opinion comprehension, demonstrating that it significantly outperforms the baselines on our adapted metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T16:11:54Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development. We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Human Simulacra: Benchmarking the Personification of Large Language Models [38.21708264569801]
  Large language models (LLMs) are recognized as systems that closely mimic aspects of human intelligence. This paper introduces a framework for constructing virtual characters' life stories from the ground up. Experimental results demonstrate that our constructed simulacra can produce personified responses that align with their target characters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T09:11:14Z)
• LLM-driven Imitation of Subrational Behavior : Illusion or Reality? [3.2365468114603937]
  Existing work highlights the ability of Large Language Models to address complex reasoning tasks and mimic human communication. We propose to investigate the use of LLMs to generate synthetic human demonstrations, which are then used to learn subrational agent policies. We experimentally evaluate the ability of our framework to model sub-rationality through four simple scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T19:46:39Z)
• Large language models as linguistic simulators and cognitive models in human research [0.0]
  The rise of large language models (LLMs) that generate human-like text has sparked debates over their potential to replace human participants in behavioral and cognitive research. We critically evaluate this replacement perspective to appraise the fundamental utility of language models in psychology and social science. This perspective reframes the role of language models in behavioral and cognitive science, serving as linguistic simulators and cognitive models that shed light on the similarities and differences between machine intelligence and human cognition and thoughts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T23:28:23Z)
• CoMPosT: Characterizing and Evaluating Caricature in LLM Simulations [61.9212914612875]
  We present a framework to characterize LLM simulations using four dimensions: Context, Model, Persona, and Topic. We use this framework to measure open-ended LLM simulations' susceptibility to caricature, defined via two criteria: individuation and exaggeration. We find that for GPT-4, simulations of certain demographics (political and marginalized groups) and topics (general, uncontroversial) are highly susceptible to caricature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T18:00:25Z)
• Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models for Empathetic Response Generation: Empirical Investigations and Improvements [28.630542719519855]
  This work empirically investigates the performance of large language models (LLMs) in generating empathetic responses. Extensive experiments show that LLMs can significantly benefit from our proposed methods and is able to achieve state-of-the-art performance in both automatic and human evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T12:21:24Z)
• User Behavior Simulation with Large Language Model based Agents [116.74368915420065]
  We propose an LLM-based agent framework and design a sandbox environment to simulate real user behaviors. Based on extensive experiments, we find that the simulated behaviors of our method are very close to the ones of real humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T02:58:35Z)
• BabySLM: language-acquisition-friendly benchmark of self-supervised spoken language models [56.93604813379634]
  Self-supervised techniques for learning speech representations have been shown to develop linguistic competence from exposure to speech without the need for human labels. We propose a language-acquisition-friendly benchmark to probe spoken language models at the lexical and syntactic levels. We highlight two exciting challenges that need to be addressed for further progress: bridging the gap between text and speech and between clean speech and in-the-wild speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T12:54:38Z)
• Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate [95.10641301155232]
  We present a complementary approach to improve language responses where multiple language model instances propose and debate their individual responses and reasoning processes over multiple rounds to arrive at a common final answer. Our findings indicate that this approach significantly enhances mathematical and strategic reasoning across a number of tasks. Our approach may be directly applied to existing black-box models and uses identical procedure and prompts for all tasks we investigate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:55:11Z)
• Rethinking the Evaluation for Conversational Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models [115.7508325840751]
  The recent success of large language models (LLMs) has shown great potential to develop more powerful conversational recommender systems (CRSs) In this paper, we embark on an investigation into the utilization of ChatGPT for conversational recommendation, revealing the inadequacy of the existing evaluation protocol. We propose an interactive Evaluation approach based on LLMs named iEvaLM that harnesses LLM-based user simulators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T15:12:43Z)
• Cue-CoT: Chain-of-thought Prompting for Responding to In-depth Dialogue Questions with LLMs [59.74002011562726]
  We propose a novel linguistic cue-based chain-of-thoughts (textitCue-CoT) to provide a more personalized and engaging response. We build a benchmark with in-depth dialogue questions, consisting of 6 datasets in both Chinese and English. Empirical results demonstrate our proposed textitCue-CoT method outperforms standard prompting methods in terms of both textithelpfulness and textitacceptability on all datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T16:27:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.