Survey of Methods, Resources, and Formats for Teaching Constraint Programming

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12717v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:27:01 GMT
• Title: Survey of Methods, Resources, and Formats for Teaching Constraint Programming
• Authors: Tejas Santanam, Helmut Simonis,
• Abstract summary: This paper is based on a survey of the community for the 2023 Workshop on Teaching Constraint Programming at the CP 2023 conference in Toronto. The paper presents the results of the survey, as well as lists of books, video courses and other tutorial materials for teaching Constraint Programming.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper provides an overview of the state of teaching for Constraint Programming, based on a survey of the community for the 2023 Workshop on Teaching Constraint Programming at the CP 2023 conference in Toronto. The paper presents the results of the survey, as well as lists of books, video courses and other tutorial materials for teaching Constraint Programming. The paper serves as a single location for current and public information on course resources, topics, formats, and methods.

Related papers

• A Course Shared Task on Evaluating LLM Output for Clinical Questions [49.78601596538669]
  This paper focuses on evaluating the output of Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating harmful answers to health-related clinical questions. We describe the task design considerations and report the feedback we received from the students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T19:24:40Z)
• Teaching Survey Research in Software Engineering [1.2184324428571227]
  We provide teachers with a potential syllabus for teaching survey research. We provide actionable advice on how to teach the topics related to each learning objective. The chapter is complemented by online teaching resources, including slides covering an entire course.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T18:38:59Z)
• Research and Practice of Delivering Tabletop Exercises [0.2796197251957245]
  Since tabletop exercises train competencies required in the workplace, they have been introduced into computing courses at universities as an innovation. To help computing educators adopt this innovative method, we surveyed academic publications that deal with tabletop exercises. Our review provides researchers, tool developers, and educators with an orientation in the area, a synthesis of trends, and implications for further work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T01:12:20Z)
• Auto-survey Challenge [0.0]
  We present a novel platform for evaluating the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously compose and critique survey papers. Within this framework, we organized a competition for the AutoML conference 2023. Entrants are tasked with presenting stand-alone models adept at authoring articles from designated prompts and subsequently appraising them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T09:12:35Z)
• ICML 2023 Topological Deep Learning Challenge : Design and Results [83.5003281210199]
  The competition asked participants to provide open-source implementations of topological neural networks from the literature. The challenge attracted twenty-eight qualifying submissions in its two-month duration. This paper describes the design of the challenge and summarizes its main findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-26T18:49:30Z)
• Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration in Peer Review [52.359007622096684]
  Peer review is a key component of the publishing process in most fields of science. Existing NLP studies focus on the analysis of individual texts. editorial assistance often requires modeling interactions between pairs of texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T16:39:38Z)
• CLICKER: A Computational LInguistics Classification Scheme for Educational Resources [47.48935730905393]
  A classification scheme of a scientific subject gives an overview of its body of knowledge. A comprehensive classification system like CCS or Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC) does not exist for Computational Linguistics (CL) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) We propose a classification scheme -- CLICKER for CL/NLP based on the analysis of online lectures from 77 university courses on this subject.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T02:40:43Z)
• LeQua@CLEF2022: Learning to Quantify [76.22817970624875]
  LeQua 2022 is a new lab for the evaluation of methods for learning to quantify'' in textual datasets. The goal of this lab is to provide a setting for the comparative evaluation of methods for learning to quantify, both in the binary setting and in the single-label multiclass setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T14:54:20Z)
• A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learning [83.47804123133719]
  The last decade has seen a surge of research in this area due to the unprecedented success of deep learning. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches from 1961 to 2021. We create a taxonomy for text classification according to the text involved and the models used for feature extraction and classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T00:09:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.