Fine-Tuning Pre-trained Language Models to Detect In-Game Trash Talks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15458v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:36:53 GMT
• Title: Fine-Tuning Pre-trained Language Models to Detect In-Game Trash Talks
• Authors: Daniel Fesalbon, Arvin De La Cruz, Marvin Mallari, Nelson Rodelas,
• Abstract summary: The study employs and evaluates the performance of pre-trained BERT and GPT language models in detecting toxicity within in-game chats. The study was able to collect around two thousand in-game chats to train and test BERT (Base-uncased), BERT (Large-uncased), and GPT-3 models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Common problems in playing online mobile and computer games were related to toxic behavior and abusive communication among players. Based on different reports and studies, the study also discusses the impact of online hate speech and toxicity on players' in-game performance and overall well-being. This study investigates the capability of pre-trained language models to classify or detect trash talk or toxic in-game messages The study employs and evaluates the performance of pre-trained BERT and GPT language models in detecting toxicity within in-game chats. Using publicly available APIs, in-game chat data from DOTA 2 game matches were collected, processed, reviewed, and labeled as non-toxic, mild (toxicity), and toxic. The study was able to collect around two thousand in-game chats to train and test BERT (Base-uncased), BERT (Large-uncased), and GPT-3 models. Based on the three models' state-of-the-art performance, this study concludes pre-trained language models' promising potential for addressing online hate speech and in-game insulting trash talk.

Related papers

• Toxic Subword Pruning for Dialogue Response Generation on Large Language Models [51.713448010799986]
  We propose textbfToxic Subword textbfPruning (ToxPrune) to prune the subword contained by the toxic words from BPE in trained LLMs. ToxPrune simultaneously improves the toxic language model NSFW-3B on the task of dialogue response generation obviously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T13:30:33Z)
• Challenges for Real-Time Toxicity Detection in Online Games [1.2289361708127877]
  Toxic behaviour and malicious players can ruin the experience, reduce the player base and potentially harm the success of the game and the studio. This article will give a brief overview of the challenges faced in toxic content detection in terms of text, audio and image processing problems, and behavioural toxicity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T09:38:58Z)
• Comprehensive Assessment of Toxicity in ChatGPT [49.71090497696024]
  We evaluate the toxicity in ChatGPT by utilizing instruction-tuning datasets. prompts in creative writing tasks can be 2x more likely to elicit toxic responses. Certain deliberately toxic prompts, designed in earlier studies, no longer yield harmful responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T14:37:53Z)
• Towards Detecting Contextual Real-Time Toxicity for In-Game Chat [5.371337604556311]
  ToxBuster is a scalable model that reliably detects toxic content in real-time for a line of chat by including chat history and metadata. ToxBuster consistently outperforms conventional toxicity models across popular multiplayer games, including Rainbow Six Siege, For Honor, and DOTA 2.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T00:29:57Z)
• Analyzing Norm Violations in Live-Stream Chat [49.120561596550395]
  We study the first NLP study dedicated to detecting norm violations in conversations on live-streaming platforms. We define norm violation categories in live-stream chats and annotate 4,583 moderated comments from Twitch. Our results show that appropriate contextual information can boost moderation performance by 35%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T05:58:27Z)
• Can Large Language Models Play Text Games Well? Current State-of-the-Art and Open Questions [22.669941641551823]
  Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 have recently demonstrated their remarkable abilities of communicating with human users. We take an initiative to investigate their capacities of playing text games, in which a player has to understand the environment and respond to situations by having dialogues with the game world. Our experiments show that ChatGPT performs competitively compared to all the existing systems but still exhibits a low level of intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T05:01:28Z)
• A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
  ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z)
• In-game Toxic Language Detection: Shared Task and Attention Residuals [1.9218741065333018]
  We describe how the in-game toxic language shared task has been established using the real-world in-game chat data. In addition, we propose and introduce the model/framework for toxic language token tagging (slot filling) from the in-game chat.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T04:33:45Z)
• Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection [75.54119209776894]
  We investigate the effect of annotator identities (who) and beliefs (why) on toxic language annotations. We consider posts with three characteristics: anti-Black language, African American English dialect, and vulgarity. Our results show strong associations between annotator identity and beliefs and their ratings of toxicity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T18:58:20Z)
• RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models [93.151822563361]
  Pretrained neural language models (LMs) are prone to generating racist, sexist, or otherwise toxic language which hinders their safe deployment. We investigate the extent to which pretrained LMs can be prompted to generate toxic language, and the effectiveness of controllable text generation algorithms at preventing such toxic degeneration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-24T03:17:19Z)
• Recognizing Affiliation: Using Behavioural Traces to Predict the Quality of Social Interactions in Online Games [26.131859388185646]
  We use behavioural traces to predict affiliation between dyadic strangers, facilitated through their social interactions in an online gaming setting. We collected audio, video, in-game, and self-report data from 23 dyads, extracted 75 features, trained Random Forest and Support Vector Machine models, and evaluated their performance predicting binary (high/low) as well as continuous affiliation toward a partner. Our findings can inform the design of multiplayer games and game communities, and guide the development of systems for matchmaking and mitigating toxic behaviour in online games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-06T20:56:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.