Do LLM Agents Have Regret? A Case Study in Online Learning and Games
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16843v2
- Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 22:32:25 GMT
- Title: Do LLM Agents Have Regret? A Case Study in Online Learning and Games
- Authors: Chanwoo Park, Xiangyu Liu, Asuman Ozdaglar, Kaiqing Zhang,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly employed for (interactive) decision-making.
We study their interactions in benchmark decision-making settings in online learning and game theory.
We propose a novel emphun training loss of emphregret-loss, which, in contrast to the supervised pre-training loss, does not require the labels of (supervised) actions.
- Score: 30.377709765198592
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly employed for (interactive) decision-making, via the development of LLM-based autonomous agents. Despite their emerging successes, the performance of LLM agents in decision-making has not been fully investigated through quantitative metrics, especially in the multi-agent setting when they interact with each other, a typical scenario in real-world LLM-agent applications. To better understand the limits of LLM agents in these interactive environments, we propose to study their interactions in benchmark decision-making settings in online learning and game theory, through the performance metric of \emph{regret}. We first empirically study the {no-regret} behaviors of LLMs in canonical (non-stationary) online learning problems, as well as the emergence of equilibria when LLM agents interact through playing repeated games. We then provide some theoretical insights into the no-regret behaviors of LLM agents, under certain assumptions on the supervised pre-training and the rationality model of human decision-makers who generate the data. Notably, we also identify (simple) cases where advanced LLMs such as GPT-4 fail to be no-regret. To promote the no-regret behaviors, we propose a novel \emph{unsupervised} training loss of \emph{regret-loss}, which, in contrast to the supervised pre-training loss, does not require the labels of (optimal) actions. We then establish the statistical guarantee of generalization bound for regret-loss minimization, followed by the optimization guarantee that minimizing such a loss may automatically lead to known no-regret learning algorithms. Our further experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our regret-loss, especially in addressing the above ``regrettable'' cases.
Related papers
- Decoding with Limited Teacher Supervision Requires Understanding When to Trust the Teacher [11.136112399898481]
How can sLLMs efficiently utilize the supervision of LLMs to improve their generative quality?
We develop an algorithm to effectively aggregate the sLLM and LLM predictions on initial tokens so that the generated tokens can more accurately condition the subsequent token generation by sLLM only.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-26T01:16:12Z) - From Words to Actions: Unveiling the Theoretical Underpinnings of LLM-Driven Autonomous Systems [59.40480894948944]
Large language model (LLM) empowered agents are able to solve decision-making problems in the physical world.
Under this model, the LLM Planner navigates a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) by iteratively generating language-based subgoals via prompting.
We prove that the pretrained LLM Planner effectively performs Bayesian aggregated imitation learning (BAIL) through in-context learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T09:42:54Z) - Towards Efficient LLM Grounding for Embodied Multi-Agent Collaboration [70.09561665520043]
We propose a novel framework for multi-agent collaboration that introduces Reinforced Advantage feedback (ReAd) for efficient self-refinement of plans.
We provide theoretical analysis by extending advantage-weighted regression in reinforcement learning to multi-agent systems.
Experiments on Over-AI and a difficult variant of RoCoBench show that ReAd surpasses baselines in success rate, and also significantly decreases the interaction steps of agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-23T08:33:19Z) - How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback.
Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities.
We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z) - Small Models, Big Insights: Leveraging Slim Proxy Models To Decide When and What to Retrieve for LLMs [60.40396361115776]
This paper introduces a novel collaborative approach, namely SlimPLM, that detects missing knowledge in large language models (LLMs) with a slim proxy model.
We employ a proxy model which has far fewer parameters, and take its answers as answers.
Heuristic answers are then utilized to predict the knowledge required to answer the user question, as well as the known and unknown knowledge within the LLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T11:11:08Z) - Reinforcement Learning from LLM Feedback to Counteract Goal
Misgeneralization [0.0]
We introduce a method to address goal misgeneralization in reinforcement learning (RL)
Goal misgeneralization occurs when an agent retains its capabilities out-of-distribution yet pursues a proxy rather than the intended one.
This study demonstrates how the Large Language Model can efficiently supervise RL agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-14T01:09:48Z) - Making Harmful Behaviors Unlearnable for Large Language Models [50.44915524846857]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential as general-purpose AI assistants in various domains.
LLMs can be easily fine-tuned into harmful assistants as the fine-tuning data often contains implicit or explicit harmful content.
This paper proposes a controllable training framework that makes harmful behaviors unlearnable during the fine-tuning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-02T09:18:21Z) - TRACE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Continual Learning in Large
Language Models [52.734140807634624]
Aligned large language models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional capabilities in task-solving, following instructions, and ensuring safety.
Existing continual learning benchmarks lack sufficient challenge for leading aligned LLMs.
We introduce TRACE, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate continual learning in LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-10T16:38:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.