Common Ground Tracking in Multimodal Dialogue
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17284v1
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:25:01 GMT
- Title: Common Ground Tracking in Multimodal Dialogue
- Authors: Ibrahim Khebour, Kenneth Lai, Mariah Bradford, Yifan Zhu, Richard Brutti, Christopher Tam, Jingxuan Tu, Benjamin Ibarra, Nathaniel Blanchard, Nikhil Krishnaswamy, James Pustejovsky,
- Abstract summary: We present a method for automatically identifying the current set of shared beliefs and questions under discussion'' (QUDs) of a group with a shared goal.
We annotate a dataset of multimodal interactions in a shared physical space with speech transcriptions, prosodic features, gestures, actions, and facets of collaboration.
We cascade into a set of formal closure rules derived from situated evidence and belief axioms and update operations.
- Score: 13.763043173931024
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Within Dialogue Modeling research in AI and NLP, considerable attention has been spent on ``dialogue state tracking'' (DST), which is the ability to update the representations of the speaker's needs at each turn in the dialogue by taking into account the past dialogue moves and history. Less studied but just as important to dialogue modeling, however, is ``common ground tracking'' (CGT), which identifies the shared belief space held by all of the participants in a task-oriented dialogue: the task-relevant propositions all participants accept as true. In this paper we present a method for automatically identifying the current set of shared beliefs and ``questions under discussion'' (QUDs) of a group with a shared goal. We annotate a dataset of multimodal interactions in a shared physical space with speech transcriptions, prosodic features, gestures, actions, and facets of collaboration, and operationalize these features for use in a deep neural model to predict moves toward construction of common ground. Model outputs cascade into a set of formal closure rules derived from situated evidence and belief axioms and update operations. We empirically assess the contribution of each feature type toward successful construction of common ground relative to ground truth, establishing a benchmark in this novel, challenging task.
Related papers
- Dialogue Agents 101: A Beginner's Guide to Critical Ingredients for Designing Effective Conversational Systems [29.394466123216258]
This study provides a comprehensive overview of the primary characteristics of a dialogue agent, their corresponding open-domain datasets, and the methods used to benchmark these datasets.
We propose UNIT, a UNified dIalogue dataseT constructed from conversations of existing datasets for different dialogue tasks capturing the nuances for each of them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-14T10:05:47Z) - KETOD: Knowledge-Enriched Task-Oriented Dialogue [77.59814785157877]
Existing studies in dialogue system research mostly treat task-oriented dialogue and chit-chat as separate domains.
We investigate how task-oriented dialogue and knowledge-grounded chit-chat can be effectively integrated into a single model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-11T16:01:03Z) - Back to the Future: Bidirectional Information Decoupling Network for
Multi-turn Dialogue Modeling [80.51094098799736]
We propose Bidirectional Information Decoupling Network (BiDeN) as a universal dialogue encoder.
BiDeN explicitly incorporates both the past and future contexts and can be generalized to a wide range of dialogue-related tasks.
Experimental results on datasets of different downstream tasks demonstrate the universality and effectiveness of our BiDeN.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-18T03:51:46Z) - Precognition in Task-oriented Dialogue Understanding: Posterior
Regularization by Future Context [8.59600111891194]
We propose to jointly model historical and future information through the posterior regularization method.
We optimize the KL distance between these to regularize our model during training.
Experiments on two dialogue datasets validate the effectiveness of our proposed method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-07T09:58:50Z) - "How Robust r u?": Evaluating Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems on Spoken
Conversations [87.95711406978157]
This work presents a new benchmark on spoken task-oriented conversations.
We study multi-domain dialogue state tracking and knowledge-grounded dialogue modeling.
Our data set enables speech-based benchmarking of task-oriented dialogue systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-28T04:51:04Z) - Dialogue State Tracking with Multi-Level Fusion of Predicted Dialogue
States and Conversations [2.6529642559155944]
We propose the Dialogue State Tracking with Multi-Level Fusion of Predicted Dialogue States and Conversations network.
This model extracts information of each dialogue turn by modeling interactions among each turn utterance, the corresponding last dialogue states, and dialogue slots.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T02:30:30Z) - Coreference Augmentation for Multi-Domain Task-Oriented Dialogue State
Tracking [3.34618986084988]
We propose Coreference Dialogue State Tracker (CDST) that explicitly models the coreference feature.
Experimental results on MultiWOZ 2.1 dataset show that the proposed model achieves the state-of-the-art joint goal accuracy of 56.47%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-16T11:47:29Z) - Is this Dialogue Coherent? Learning from Dialogue Acts and Entities [82.44143808977209]
We create the Switchboard Coherence (SWBD-Coh) corpus, a dataset of human-human spoken dialogues annotated with turn coherence ratings.
Our statistical analysis of the corpus indicates how turn coherence perception is affected by patterns of distribution of entities.
We find that models combining both DA and entity information yield the best performances both for response selection and turn coherence rating.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-17T21:02:40Z) - UniConv: A Unified Conversational Neural Architecture for Multi-domain
Task-oriented Dialogues [101.96097419995556]
"UniConv" is a novel unified neural architecture for end-to-end conversational systems in task-oriented dialogues.
We conduct comprehensive experiments in dialogue state tracking, context-to-text, and end-to-end settings on the MultiWOZ2.1 benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-29T16:28:22Z) - Dialogue-Based Relation Extraction [53.2896545819799]
We present the first human-annotated dialogue-based relation extraction (RE) dataset DialogRE.
We argue that speaker-related information plays a critical role in the proposed task, based on an analysis of similarities and differences between dialogue-based and traditional RE tasks.
Experimental results demonstrate that a speaker-aware extension on the best-performing model leads to gains in both the standard and conversational evaluation settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-17T03:51:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.