Can AI Models Appreciate Document Aesthetics? An Exploration of Legibility and Layout Quality in Relation to Prediction Confidence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18183v1
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 01:21:48 GMT
- Title: Can AI Models Appreciate Document Aesthetics? An Exploration of Legibility and Layout Quality in Relation to Prediction Confidence
- Authors: Hsiu-Wei Yang, Abhinav Agrawal, Pavlos Fragkogiannis, Shubham Nitin Mulay,
- Abstract summary: A well-designed document communicates not only through its words but also through its visual eloquence.
Authors utilize aesthetic elements such as colors, fonts, graphics, and layouts to shape the perception of information.
While state-of-the-art document AI models demonstrate the benefits of incorporating layout and image data, it remains unclear whether the nuances of document aesthetics are effectively captured.
- Score: 3.049887057143419
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: A well-designed document communicates not only through its words but also through its visual eloquence. Authors utilize aesthetic elements such as colors, fonts, graphics, and layouts to shape the perception of information. Thoughtful document design, informed by psychological insights, enhances both the visual appeal and the comprehension of the content. While state-of-the-art document AI models demonstrate the benefits of incorporating layout and image data, it remains unclear whether the nuances of document aesthetics are effectively captured. To bridge the gap between human cognition and AI interpretation of aesthetic elements, we formulated hypotheses concerning AI behavior in document understanding tasks, specifically anchored in document design principles. With a focus on legibility and layout quality, we tested four aspects of aesthetic effects: noise, font-size contrast, alignment, and complexity, on model confidence using correlational analysis. The results and observations highlight the value of model analysis rooted in document design theories. Our work serves as a trailhead for further studies and we advocate for continued research in this topic to deepen our understanding of how AI interprets document aesthetics.
Related papers
- KITTEN: A Knowledge-Intensive Evaluation of Image Generation on Visual Entities [93.74881034001312]
We conduct a systematic study on the fidelity of entities in text-to-image generation models.
We focus on their ability to generate a wide range of real-world visual entities, such as landmark buildings, aircraft, plants, and animals.
Our findings reveal that even the most advanced text-to-image models often fail to generate entities with accurate visual details.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T17:50:37Z) - When Does Perceptual Alignment Benefit Vision Representations? [76.32336818860965]
We investigate how aligning vision model representations to human perceptual judgments impacts their usability.
We find that aligning models to perceptual judgments yields representations that improve upon the original backbones across many downstream tasks.
Our results suggest that injecting an inductive bias about human perceptual knowledge into vision models can contribute to better representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T17:59:58Z) - ViRED: Prediction of Visual Relations in Engineering Drawings [12.49418314310749]
We propose a vision-based relation detection model, named ViRED, to identify the associations between tables and circuits in electrical engineering drawings.
Within the engineering drawing dataset, our approach attained an accuracy of 96% in the task of relation prediction.
Results also show that ViRED can inference at a fast speed even when there are numerous objects in a single engineering drawing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-02T02:42:34Z) - GalleryGPT: Analyzing Paintings with Large Multimodal Models [64.98398357569765]
Artwork analysis is important and fundamental skill for art appreciation, which could enrich personal aesthetic sensibility and facilitate the critical thinking ability.
Previous works for automatically analyzing artworks mainly focus on classification, retrieval, and other simple tasks, which is far from the goal of AI.
We introduce a superior large multimodal model for painting analysis composing, dubbed GalleryGPT, which is slightly modified and fine-tuned based on LLaVA architecture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-01T11:52:56Z) - DocXplain: A Novel Model-Agnostic Explainability Method for Document Image Classification [5.247930659596986]
This paper introduces DocXplain, a novel model-agnostic explainability method specifically designed for generating high interpretability feature attribution maps.
We extensively evaluate our proposed approach in the context of document image classification, utilizing 4 different evaluation metrics.
To the best of the authors' knowledge, this work presents the first model-agnostic attribution-based explainability method specifically tailored for document images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-04T10:59:15Z) - Impressions: Understanding Visual Semiotics and Aesthetic Impact [66.40617566253404]
We present Impressions, a novel dataset through which to investigate the semiotics of images.
We show that existing multimodal image captioning and conditional generation models struggle to simulate plausible human responses to images.
This dataset significantly improves their ability to model impressions and aesthetic evaluations of images through fine-tuning and few-shot adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-27T04:30:18Z) - Document AI: A Comparative Study of Transformer-Based, Graph-Based
Models, and Convolutional Neural Networks For Document Layout Analysis [3.231170156689185]
Document AI aims to automatically analyze documents by leveraging natural language processing and computer vision techniques.
One of the major tasks of Document AI is document layout analysis, which structures document pages by interpreting the content and spatial relationships of layout, image, and text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-29T16:58:03Z) - Inching Towards Automated Understanding of the Meaning of Art: An
Application to Computational Analysis of Mondrian's Artwork [0.0]
This paper attempts to identify capabilities that are related to semantic processing.
The proposed methodology identifies the missing capabilities by comparing the process of understanding Mondrian's paintings with the process of understanding electronic circuit designs.
To explain the usefulness of the methodology, the paper discusses a new, three-step computational method to distinguish Mondrian's paintings from other artwork.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-29T23:34:19Z) - Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Images [87.97623543523858]
We introduce Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) models for assessing both the quality perception (look) and abstract perception (feel) of images in a zero-shot manner.
Our results show that CLIP captures meaningful priors that generalize well to different perceptual assessments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-25T17:58:16Z) - Document AI: Benchmarks, Models and Applications [35.46858492311289]
Document AI refers to the techniques for automatically reading, understanding, and analyzing business documents.
In recent years, the popularity of deep learning technology has greatly advanced the development of Document AI.
This paper briefly reviews some of the representative models, tasks, and benchmark datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-16T16:43:07Z) - Survey on Visual Sentiment Analysis [87.20223213370004]
This paper reviews pertinent publications and tries to present an exhaustive overview of the field of Visual Sentiment Analysis.
The paper also describes principles of design of general Visual Sentiment Analysis systems from three main points of view.
A formalization of the problem is discussed, considering different levels of granularity, as well as the components that can affect the sentiment toward an image in different ways.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-24T10:15:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.