Developing Safe and Responsible Large Language Model : Can We Balance Bias Reduction and Language Understanding in Large Language Models?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01399v4
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 18:18:16 GMT
- Title: Developing Safe and Responsible Large Language Model : Can We Balance Bias Reduction and Language Understanding in Large Language Models?
- Authors: Shaina Raza, Oluwanifemi Bamgbose, Shardul Ghuge, Fatemeh Tavakol, Deepak John Reji, Syed Raza Bashir,
- Abstract summary: This study explores whether Large Language Models can produce safe, unbiased outputs without sacrificing knowledge or comprehension.
We introduce the Safe and Responsible Large Language Model (textbfSR$_textLLM$), which has been instruction fine-tuned atop an inherently safe fine-tuned LLM.
Experiments reveal that textbfSR$_textLLM$ effectively reduces biases while preserving knowledge integrity.
- Score: 2.089112028396727
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, such as text generation and translation, among others. However, these models often generate text that can perpetuate biases. Existing approaches to mitigate these biases usually compromise knowledge retention. This study explores whether LLMs can produce safe, unbiased outputs without sacrificing knowledge or comprehension. We introduce the Safe and Responsible Large Language Model (\textbf{SR}$_{\text{LLM}}$), which has been instruction fine-tuned atop an inherently safe fine-tuned LLM to reduce biases in generated texts. We developed a specialized dataset with examples of unsafe and corresponding safe variations to train \textbf{SR}$_{\text{LLM}}$ to identify and correct biased text. Experiments on our specialized dataset and out-of-distribution test sets reveal that \textbf{SR}$_{\text{LLM}}$ effectively reduces biases while preserving knowledge integrity. This performance surpasses that of traditional fine-tuning of smaller language models and base LLMs that merely reply on prompting techniques. Our findings indicate that instruction fine-tuning is an effective strategy for minimizing bias in LLMs while retaining knowledge. The code and dataset are accessible at \href{https://github.com/shainarazavi/Safe-Responsible-LLM}{SR-LLM}.
Related papers
- Extracting Memorized Training Data via Decomposition [24.198975804570072]
We demonstrate a simple, query-based decompositional method to extract news articles from two frontier Large Language Models.
We extract at least one sentence from 73 articles, and over 20% of verbatim sentences from 6 articles.
If replicable at scale, this training data extraction methodology could expose new LLM security and safety vulnerabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T23:59:32Z) - Robustness of LLMs to Perturbations in Text [2.0670689746336]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance, but can they handle the inevitable noise in real-world data?
This work tackles this critical question by investigating LLMs' resilience against morphological variations in text.
Our findings show that contrary to popular beliefs, generative LLMs are quiet robust to noisy perturbations in text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-12T04:50:17Z) - Robust and Scalable Model Editing for Large Language Models [75.95623066605259]
We propose EREN (Edit models by REading Notes) to improve the scalability and robustness of LLM editing.
Unlike existing techniques, it can integrate knowledge from multiple edits, and correctly respond to syntactically similar but semantically unrelated inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-26T06:57:23Z) - TEaR: Improving LLM-based Machine Translation with Systematic Self-Refinement [26.26493253161022]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive results in Machine Translation (MT)
We introduce a systematic LLM-based self-refinement translation framework, named textbfTEaR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T07:58:12Z) - Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering.
The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored.
We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z) - Tuna: Instruction Tuning using Feedback from Large Language Models [74.04950416204551]
We propose finetuning an instruction-tuned large language model using our novel textitprobabilistic ranking and textitcontextual ranking approaches.
Probabilistic ranking enables the instruction-tuned model to inherit the relative rankings of high-quality and low-quality responses from the teacher LLM.
On the other hand, learning with contextual ranking allows the model to refine its own response distribution using the contextual understanding ability of stronger LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T09:55:06Z) - On the Safety of Open-Sourced Large Language Models: Does Alignment
Really Prevent Them From Being Misused? [49.99955642001019]
We show that open-sourced, aligned large language models could be easily misguided to generate undesired content.
Our key idea is to directly manipulate the generation process of open-sourced LLMs to misguide it to generate undesired content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T19:22:01Z) - Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMs [59.596335292426105]
This paper collects the first open-source dataset to evaluate safeguards in large language models.
We train several BERT-like classifiers to achieve results comparable with GPT-4 on automatic safety evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-25T14:02:12Z) - TIM: Teaching Large Language Models to Translate with Comparison [78.66926087162672]
We propose a novel framework using examples in comparison to teach LLMs to learn translation.
Our approach involves presenting the model with examples of correct and incorrect translations and using a preference loss to guide the model's learning.
Our findings offer a new perspective on fine-tuning LLMs for translation tasks and provide a promising solution for generating high-quality translations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-10T08:15:40Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.