How Sparse Attention Approximates Exact Attention? Your Attention is Naturally $n^C$-Sparse

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02690v2
• Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 14:32:46 GMT
• Title: How Sparse Attention Approximates Exact Attention? Your Attention is Naturally $n^C$-Sparse
• Authors: Yichuan Deng, Zhao Song, Jing Xiong, Chiwun Yang,
• Abstract summary: Sparse Attention is a technique that approximates standard attention computation with sub-quadratic complexity. Variations of this technique, such as pruning KV cache, sparsity-based fast attention, and Sparse Transformer, have been extensively utilized for efficient Large Language Models (LLMs) deployment.
• Score: 9.552839922307587
• License:
• Abstract: Sparse Attention is a technique that approximates standard attention computation with sub-quadratic complexity. This is achieved by selectively ignoring smaller entries in the attention matrix during the softmax function computation. Variations of this technique, such as pruning KV cache, sparsity-based fast attention, and Sparse Transformer, have been extensively utilized for efficient Large Language Models (LLMs) deployment. Despite its widespread use, a theoretical understanding of the conditions under which sparse attention performs on par with traditional attention remains elusive. This work aims to $\textbf{bridge this gap by examining the inherent sparsity of standard attention processes}$. Our theoretical framework reveals several brand-new key insights: $\bullet$ Attention is $n^{C}$-sparse, implying that considering only the largest $\Omega(n^{C})$ entries out of all $n$ entries is sufficient for sparse attention to approximate the exact attention matrix with decreasing loss. Here, $n$ represents the input length and $C \in (0, 1)$ is a constant. $\bullet$ Stable $o(\log(n))$-sparse attention, which approximates attention computation with $\log(n)$ or fewer entries, may not be feasible since the error will persist at a minimum of $O(1)$. $\bullet$ An adaptive strategy ($\alpha \cdot n^C, \alpha \in \mathbb{R}$) for the window size of efficient attention methods rather than a fixed one is guaranteed to perform more accurately and efficiently in a task for inference on flexible context lengths.

Related papers

• LevAttention: Time, Space, and Streaming Efficient Algorithm for Heavy Attentions [54.54897832889028]
  We show that for any $K$, there is a universal set" $U subset [n]$ of size independent of $n$, such that for any $Q$ and any row $i$, the large attention scores $A_i,j$ in row $i$ of $A$ all have $jin U$. We empirically show the benefits of our scheme for vision transformers, showing how to train new models that use our universal set while training as well.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T19:47:13Z)
• Optimal Sketching for Residual Error Estimation for Matrix and Vector Norms [50.15964512954274]
  We study the problem of residual error estimation for matrix and vector norms using a linear sketch. We demonstrate that this gives a substantial advantage empirically, for roughly the same sketch size and accuracy as in previous work. We also show an $Omega(k2/pn1-2/p)$ lower bound for the sparse recovery problem, which is tight up to a $mathrmpoly(log n)$ factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T02:33:07Z)
• Conv-Basis: A New Paradigm for Efficient Attention Inference and Gradient Computation in Transformers [16.046186753149]
  Self-attention mechanism is the key to the success of transformers in recent Large Language Models (LLMs) We leverage the convolution-like structure of attention matrices to develop an efficient approximation method for attention using convolution matrices. We hope our new paradigm for accelerating attention computation in transformer models can help their application to longer contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T17:11:38Z)
• One Pass Streaming Algorithm for Super Long Token Attention Approximation in Sublinear Space [11.735802740426294]
  Attention computation takes both the time complexity of $O(n2)$ and the space complexity of $O(n2)$ simultaneously. We introduce a new algorithm that only reads one pass of data in a streaming fashion. Notably, our algorithm exhibits exceptional memory-efficient performance with super-long tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-24T18:35:00Z)
• How to Capture Higher-order Correlations? Generalizing Matrix Softmax Attention to Kronecker Computation [12.853829771559916]
  We study a generalization of attention which captures triple-wise correlations. This generalization is able to solve problems about detecting triple-wise connections that were shown to be impossible for transformers. We show that our construction, algorithms, and lower bounds naturally generalize to higher-order tensors and correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T07:42:39Z)
• Randomized and Deterministic Attention Sparsification Algorithms for Over-parameterized Feature Dimension [18.57735939471469]
  We consider the sparsification of the attention problem. For any super large feature dimension, we can reduce it down to the size nearly linear in length of sentence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T05:52:38Z)
• Fast Attention Requires Bounded Entries [19.17278873525312]
  inner product attention computation is a fundamental task for training large language models such as Transformer, GPT-1, BERT, GPT-2, GPT-3 and ChatGPT. We investigate whether faster algorithms are possible by implicitly making use of the matrix $A$. This gives a theoretical explanation for the phenomenon observed in practice that attention computation is much more efficient when the input matrices have smaller entries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-26T02:42:39Z)
• Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Surprise Bound [66.15308700413814]
  We propose a provably efficient reinforcement learning algorithm (both computationally and statistically) with general value function approximations. Our algorithm achieves reasonable regret bounds when applied to both the linear setting and the sparse high-dimensional linear setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T20:21:25Z)
• Learning a Latent Simplex in Input-Sparsity Time [58.30321592603066]
  We consider the problem of learning a latent $k$-vertex simplex $KsubsetmathbbRdtimes n$, given access to $AinmathbbRdtimes n$. We show that the dependence on $k$ in the running time is unnecessary given a natural assumption about the mass of the top $k$ singular values of $A$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T16:40:48Z)
• Streaming Complexity of SVMs [110.63976030971106]
  We study the space complexity of solving the bias-regularized SVM problem in the streaming model. We show that for both problems, for dimensions of $frac1lambdaepsilon$, one can obtain streaming algorithms with spacely smaller than $frac1lambdaepsilon$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T17:10:00Z)
• Taking a hint: How to leverage loss predictors in contextual bandits? [63.546913998407405]
  We study learning in contextual bandits with the help of loss predictors. We show that the optimal regret is $mathcalO(minsqrtT, sqrtmathcalETfrac13)$ when $mathcalE$ is known.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T07:36:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.