Logic Query of Thoughts: Guiding Large Language Models to Answer Complex Logic Queries with Knowledge Graphs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04264v4
• Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 18:35:49 GMT
• Title: Logic Query of Thoughts: Guiding Large Language Models to Answer Complex Logic Queries with Knowledge Graphs
• Authors: Lihui Liu, Zihao Wang, Ruizhong Qiu, Yikun Ban, Eunice Chan, Yangqiu Song, Jingrui He, Hanghang Tong,
• Abstract summary: 'Logic-Query-of-Thoughts' (LGOT) is the first of its kind to combine knowledge graph reasoning and large language models. Our experimental findings demonstrate substantial performance enhancements, with up to 20% improvement over ChatGPT.
• Score: 102.37496443389203
• License:
• Abstract: Despite the superb performance in many tasks, large language models (LLMs) bear the risk of generating hallucination or even wrong answers when confronted with tasks that demand the accuracy of knowledge. The issue becomes even more noticeable when addressing logic queries that require multiple logic reasoning steps. On the other hand, knowledge graph (KG) based question answering methods are capable of accurately identifying the correct answers with the help of knowledge graph, yet its accuracy could quickly deteriorate when the knowledge graph itself is sparse and incomplete. It remains a critical challenge on how to integrate knowledge graph reasoning with LLMs in a mutually beneficial way so as to mitigate both the hallucination problem of LLMs as well as the incompleteness issue of knowledge graphs. In this paper, we propose 'Logic-Query-of-Thoughts' (LGOT) which is the first of its kind to combine LLMs with knowledge graph based logic query reasoning. LGOT seamlessly combines knowledge graph reasoning and LLMs, effectively breaking down complex logic queries into easy to answer subquestions. Through the utilization of both knowledge graph reasoning and LLMs, it successfully derives answers for each subquestion. By aggregating these results and selecting the highest quality candidate answers for each step, LGOT achieves accurate results to complex questions. Our experimental findings demonstrate substantial performance enhancements, with up to 20% improvement over ChatGPT.

Related papers

• On Memorization of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoning [70.94164038947078]
  Large language models (LLMs) achieve good performance on challenging reasoning benchmarks, yet could also make basic reasoning mistakes. One hypothesis is that the increasingly high and nearly saturated performance could be due to the memorization of similar problems. We show that fine-tuning leads to heavy memorization, but it also consistently improves generalization performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T15:31:54Z)
• Graph Reasoning with Large Language Models via Pseudo-code Prompting [25.469214467011362]
  This paper investigates whether prompting via pseudo-code instructions can improve the performance of large language models (LLMs) in solving graph problems. Our experiments demonstrate that using pseudo-code instructions generally improves the performance of all considered LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T14:52:40Z)
• Debate on Graph: a Flexible and Reliable Reasoning Framework for Large Language Models [33.662269036173456]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) may suffer from hallucinations in real-world applications due to the lack of relevant knowledge. Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA) serves as a critical touchstone for the integration. We propose an interactive KGQA framework that leverages the interactive learning capabilities of LLMs to perform reasoning and Debating over Graphs (DoG)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T01:11:58Z)
• Revisiting the Graph Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models: Case Studies in Translation, Connectivity and Shortest Path [53.71787069694794]
  We focus on the graph reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) We revisit the ability of LLMs on three fundamental graph tasks: graph description translation, graph connectivity, and the shortest-path problem. Our findings suggest that LLMs can fail to understand graph structures through text descriptions and exhibit varying performance for all these fundamental tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-18T16:26:39Z)
• Improving Complex Reasoning over Knowledge Graph with Logic-Aware Curriculum Tuning [89.89857766491475]
  We propose a complex reasoning schema over KG upon large language models (LLMs) We augment the arbitrary first-order logical queries via binary tree decomposition to stimulate the reasoning capability of LLMs. Experiments across widely used datasets demonstrate that LACT has substantial improvements(brings an average +5.5% MRR score) over advanced methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T18:12:08Z)
• On Exploring the Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs [11.878708460150726]
  Two research questions are formulated to investigate the accuracy of LLMs in recalling information from pre-training knowledge graphs. To address these questions, we employ LLMs to perform four distinct knowledge graph reasoning tasks. Our experimental results demonstrate that LLMs can successfully tackle both simple and complex knowledge graph reasoning tasks from their own memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T05:08:47Z)
• Language Models can be Logical Solvers [99.40649402395725]
  We introduce LoGiPT, a novel language model that directly emulates the reasoning processes of logical solvers. LoGiPT is fine-tuned on a newly constructed instruction-tuning dataset derived from revealing and refining the invisible reasoning process of deductive solvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-10T16:23:50Z)
• Can Language Models Solve Graph Problems in Natural Language? [51.28850846990929]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted for a variety of tasks with implicit graphical structures. We propose NLGraph, a benchmark of graph-based problem solving simulating in natural language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T08:29:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.