Graph Chain-of-Thought: Augmenting Large Language Models by Reasoning on Graphs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07103v3
• Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 13:55:08 GMT
• Title: Graph Chain-of-Thought: Augmenting Large Language Models by Reasoning on Graphs
• Authors: Bowen Jin, Chulin Xie, Jiawei Zhang, Kashob Kumar Roy, Yu Zhang, Zheng Li, Ruirui Li, Xianfeng Tang, Suhang Wang, Yu Meng, Jiawei Han,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) suffer from hallucinations, especially on knowledge-intensive tasks. Existing works propose to augment LLMs with individual text units retrieved from external knowledge corpora. We propose a framework called Graph Chain-of-thought (Graph-CoT) to augment LLMs with graphs by encouraging LLMs to reason on the graph iteratively.
• Score: 60.71360240206726
• License:
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs), while exhibiting exceptional performance, suffer from hallucinations, especially on knowledge-intensive tasks. Existing works propose to augment LLMs with individual text units retrieved from external knowledge corpora to alleviate the issue. However, in many domains, texts are interconnected (e.g., academic papers in a bibliographic graph are linked by citations and co-authorships) which form a (text-attributed) graph. The knowledge in such graphs is encoded not only in single texts/nodes but also in their associated connections. To facilitate the research of augmenting LLMs with graphs, we manually construct a Graph Reasoning Benchmark dataset called GRBench, containing 1,740 questions that can be answered with the knowledge from 10 domain graphs. Then, we propose a simple and effective framework called Graph Chain-of-thought (Graph-CoT) to augment LLMs with graphs by encouraging LLMs to reason on the graph iteratively. Each Graph-CoT iteration consists of three sub-steps: LLM reasoning, LLM-graph interaction, and graph execution. We conduct systematic experiments with three LLM backbones on GRBench, where Graph-CoT outperforms the baselines consistently. The code is available at https://github.com/PeterGriffinJin/Graph-CoT.

Related papers

• GraphiT: Efficient Node Classification on Text-Attributed Graphs with Prompt Optimized LLMs [0.0]
  GraphiT (Graphs in Text) is a framework for encoding graphs into a textual format. We show how GraphiT leads to measurably better results without prompt tweaking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T19:38:41Z)
• What Do LLMs Need to Understand Graphs: A Survey of Parametric Representation of Graphs [69.48708136448694]
  Large language models (LLMs) are reorganizing in the AI community for their expected reasoning and inference abilities. We believe this kind of parametric representation of graphs, graph laws, can be a solution for making LLMs understand graph data as the input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T00:01:31Z)
• Can Large Language Models Analyze Graphs like Professionals? A Benchmark, Datasets and Models [90.98855064914379]
  We introduce ProGraph, a benchmark for large language models (LLMs) to process graphs. Our findings reveal that the performance of current LLMs is unsatisfactory, with the best model achieving only 36% accuracy. We propose LLM4Graph datasets, which include crawled documents and auto-generated codes based on 6 widely used graph libraries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T11:38:45Z)
• GraphInstruct: Empowering Large Language Models with Graph Understanding and Reasoning Capability [28.713449421717193]
  We evaluate and enhance the graph understanding abilities of large language models (LLMs) In this paper, we propose a benchmark named GraphInstruct, which includes 21 classical graph reasoning tasks. We construct GraphLM through efficient instruction-tuning, which shows prominent graph understanding capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T13:36:08Z)
• G-Retriever: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Textual Graph Understanding and Question Answering [61.93058781222079]
  We develop a flexible question-answering framework targeting real-world textual graphs. We introduce the first retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach for general textual graphs. G-Retriever performs RAG over a graph by formulating this task as a Prize-Collecting Steiner Tree optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T13:13:04Z)
• Large Language Models on Graphs: A Comprehensive Survey [77.16803297418201]
  We provide a systematic review of scenarios and techniques related to large language models on graphs. We first summarize potential scenarios of adopting LLMs on graphs into three categories, namely pure graphs, text-attributed graphs, and text-paired graphs. We discuss the real-world applications of such methods and summarize open-source codes and benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T14:14:27Z)
• GraphGPT: Graph Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models [27.036935149004726]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have evolved to understand graph structures. To enhance robustness, self-supervised learning (SSL) has become a vital tool for data augmentation. Our research tackles this by advancing graph model generalization in zero-shot learning environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:17:46Z)
• GraphText: Graph Reasoning in Text Space [32.00258972022153]
  GraphText is a framework that translates graphs into natural language. GraphText can achieve on par with, or even surpassing, the performance of supervised-trained graph neural networks. It paves the way for interactive graph reasoning, allowing both humans and LLMs to communicate with the model seamlessly using natural language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T11:03:57Z)
• Can Language Models Solve Graph Problems in Natural Language? [51.28850846990929]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted for a variety of tasks with implicit graphical structures. We propose NLGraph, a benchmark of graph-based problem solving simulating in natural language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T08:29:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.