Harnessing GPT-4V(ision) for Insurance: A Preliminary Exploration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09690v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:45:30 GMT
• Title: Harnessing GPT-4V(ision) for Insurance: A Preliminary Exploration
• Authors: Chenwei Lin, Hanjia Lyu, Jiebo Luo, Xian Xu,
• Abstract summary: Insurance involves a wide variety of data forms in its operational processes, including text, images, and videos. GPT-4V exhibits remarkable abilities in insurance-related tasks, demonstrating a robust understanding of multimodal content. However, GPT-4V struggles with detailed risk rating and loss assessment, suffers from hallucination in image understanding, and shows variable support for different languages.
• Score: 51.36387171207314
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The emergence of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) marks a significant milestone in the development of artificial intelligence. Insurance, as a vast and complex discipline, involves a wide variety of data forms in its operational processes, including text, images, and videos, thereby giving rise to diverse multimodal tasks. Despite this, there has been limited systematic exploration of multimodal tasks specific to insurance, nor a thorough investigation into how LMMs can address these challenges. In this paper, we explore GPT-4V's capabilities in the insurance domain. We categorize multimodal tasks by focusing primarily on visual aspects based on types of insurance (e.g., auto, household/commercial property, health, and agricultural insurance) and insurance stages (e.g., risk assessment, risk monitoring, and claims processing). Our experiment reveals that GPT-4V exhibits remarkable abilities in insurance-related tasks, demonstrating not only a robust understanding of multimodal content in the insurance domain but also a comprehensive knowledge of insurance scenarios. However, there are notable shortcomings: GPT-4V struggles with detailed risk rating and loss assessment, suffers from hallucination in image understanding, and shows variable support for different languages. Through this work, we aim to bridge the insurance domain with cutting-edge LMM technology, facilitate interdisciplinary exchange and development, and provide a foundation for the continued advancement and evolution of future research endeavors.

Related papers

• Multimodal Situational Safety [73.63981779844916]
  We present the first evaluation and analysis of a novel safety challenge termed Multimodal Situational Safety. For an MLLM to respond safely, whether through language or action, it often needs to assess the safety implications of a language query within its corresponding visual context. We develop the Multimodal Situational Safety benchmark (MSSBench) to assess the situational safety performance of current MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T16:16:07Z)
• INS-MMBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating LVLMs' Performance in Insurance [51.36387171207314]
  We propose INS-MMBench, the first comprehensive LVLMs benchmark tailored for the insurance domain. INS-MMBench comprises a total of 2.2K thoroughly designed multiple-choice questions, covering 12 meta-tasks and 22 fundamental tasks. This evaluation provides an in-depth performance analysis of current LVLMs on various multimodal tasks in the insurance domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T13:31:49Z)
• Benchmarking Trustworthiness of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Study [51.19622266249408]
  MultiTrust is the first comprehensive and unified benchmark on the trustworthiness of MLLMs. Our benchmark employs a rigorous evaluation strategy that addresses both multimodal risks and cross-modal impacts. Extensive experiments with 21 modern MLLMs reveal some previously unexplored trustworthiness issues and risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T08:38:13Z)
• Inquire, Interact, and Integrate: A Proactive Agent Collaborative Framework for Zero-Shot Multimodal Medical Reasoning [21.562034852024272]
  The adoption of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare has attracted significant research interest. Most state-of-the-art LLMs are unimodal, text-only models that cannot directly process multimodal inputs. We propose a multimodal medical collaborative reasoning framework textbfMultiMedRes to solve medical multimodal reasoning problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-19T18:26:11Z)
• MMT-Bench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models Towards Multitask AGI [71.53579367538725]
  MMT-Bench is a benchmark designed to assess Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) across massive multimodal tasks. MMT-Bench comprises $31,325$ meticulously curated multi-choice visual questions from various multimodal scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T17:37:05Z)
• A Survey on Safe Multi-Modal Learning System [10.914595812695218]
  multimodal learning systems (MMLS) have gained traction for their ability to process and integrate information from diverse modality inputs. The absence of systematic research into their safety is a significant barrier to progress in this field. We present the first taxonomy that systematically categorizes and assesses MMLS safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T02:27:13Z)
• AutoFraudNet: A Multimodal Network to Detect Fraud in the Auto Insurance Industry [3.871148938060281]
  Insurance claims typically come with a plethora of data from different modalities. Despite recent advances in multimodal learning, these frameworks still suffer from challenges of joint-training. We introduce a multimodal reasoning framework, AutoFraudNet, for detecting fraudulent auto-insurance claims.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-15T13:50:32Z)
• A Survey of Risk-Aware Multi-Armed Bandits [84.67376599822569]
  We review various risk measures of interest, and comment on their properties. We consider algorithms for the regret minimization setting, where the exploration-exploitation trade-off manifests. We conclude by commenting on persisting challenges and fertile areas for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-12T02:20:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.