Small Language Models are Good Too: An Empirical Study of Zero-Shot Classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11122v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 07:10:28 GMT
• Title: Small Language Models are Good Too: An Empirical Study of Zero-Shot Classification
• Authors: Pierre Lepagnol, Thomas Gerald, Sahar Ghannay, Christophe Servan, Sophie Rosset,
• Abstract summary: We benchmark language models from 77M to 40B parameters using different architectures and scoring functions. Our findings reveal that small models can effectively classify texts, getting on par with or surpassing their larger counterparts. This research underscores the notion that bigger isn't always better, suggesting that resource-efficient small models may offer viable solutions for specific data classification challenges.
• Score: 4.4467858321751015
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This study is part of the debate on the efficiency of large versus small language models for text classification by prompting.We assess the performance of small language models in zero-shot text classification, challenging the prevailing dominance of large models.Across 15 datasets, our investigation benchmarks language models from 77M to 40B parameters using different architectures and scoring functions. Our findings reveal that small models can effectively classify texts, getting on par with or surpassing their larger counterparts.We developed and shared a comprehensive open-source repository that encapsulates our methodologies. This research underscores the notion that bigger isn't always better, suggesting that resource-efficient small models may offer viable solutions for specific data classification challenges.

Related papers

• A Survey of Small Language Models [104.80308007044634]
  Small Language Models (SLMs) have become increasingly important due to their efficiency and performance to perform various language tasks with minimal computational resources. We present a comprehensive survey on SLMs, focusing on their architectures, training techniques, and model compression techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T23:52:28Z)
• InkubaLM: A small language model for low-resource African languages [9.426968756845389]
  InkubaLM is a small language model with 0.4 billion parameters. It achieves performance comparable to models with significantly larger parameter counts. It demonstrates remarkable consistency across multiple languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T05:42:31Z)
• Emergent Abilities in Reduced-Scale Generative Language Models [10.51168925267033]
  Large language models can solve new tasks without task-specific fine-tuning. This ability is considered an emergent ability and is primarily seen in large language models with billions of parameters. This study investigates if such emergent properties are strictly tied to model size or can be demonstrated by smaller models trained on reduced-scale data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T18:00:28Z)
• Language Models for Text Classification: Is In-Context Learning Enough? [54.869097980761595]
  Recent foundational language models have shown state-of-the-art performance in many NLP tasks in zero- and few-shot settings. An advantage of these models over more standard approaches is the ability to understand instructions written in natural language (prompts) This makes them suitable for addressing text classification problems for domains with limited amounts of annotated instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T12:47:39Z)
• Information-Theoretic Distillation for Reference-less Summarization [67.51150817011617]
  We present a novel framework to distill a powerful summarizer based on the information-theoretic objective for summarization. We start off from Pythia-2.8B as the teacher model, which is not yet capable of summarization. We arrive at a compact but powerful summarizer with only 568M parameters that performs competitively against ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T17:42:08Z)
• Let the Pretrained Language Models "Imagine" for Short Texts Topic Modeling [29.87929724277381]
  In short texts, co-occurrence information is minimal, which results in feature sparsity in document representation. Existing topic models (probabilistic or neural) mostly fail to mine patterns from them to generate coherent topics. We extend short text into longer sequences using existing pre-trained language models (PLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T00:23:30Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Tasks [92.64781370921486]
  We present an extensive analysis of various benchmarks including a sentence planning benchmark with different granularities. After comparing large language models against state-of-the-start finetuned smaller models, we present a spectrum showing large language models falling behind, are comparable, or exceed the ability of smaller models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T03:48:24Z)
• RAVEN: In-Context Learning with Retrieval-Augmented Encoder-Decoder Language Models [57.12888828853409]
  RAVEN is a model that combines retrieval-augmented masked language modeling and prefix language modeling. Fusion-in-Context Learning enables the model to leverage more in-context examples without requiring additional training. Our work underscores the potential of retrieval-augmented encoder-decoder language models for in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T17:59:18Z)
• An Application of Pseudo-Log-Likelihoods to Natural Language Scoring [5.382454613390483]
  A language model with relatively few parameters and training steps can outperform it on a recent large data set. We produce some absolute state-of-the-art results for common sense reasoning in binary choice tasks. We argue that robustness of the smaller model ought to be understood in terms of compositionality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-23T22:00:54Z)
• Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
  Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict. This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data. Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.