Enhancing Argument Summarization: Prioritizing Exhaustiveness in Key Point Generation and Introducing an Automatic Coverage Evaluation Metric

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11793v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 23:00:29 GMT
• Title: Enhancing Argument Summarization: Prioritizing Exhaustiveness in Key Point Generation and Introducing an Automatic Coverage Evaluation Metric
• Authors: Mohammad Khosravani, Chenyang Huang, Amine Trabelsi,
• Abstract summary: Key Point Analysis (KPA) task formulates argument summarization as representing the summary of a large collection of arguments. A sub-task of KPA, called Key Point Generation (KPG), focuses on generating these key points given the arguments. This paper introduces a novel extractive approach for key point generation, that outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods for the task.
• Score: 3.0754290232284562
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The proliferation of social media platforms has given rise to the amount of online debates and arguments. Consequently, the need for automatic summarization methods for such debates is imperative, however this area of summarization is rather understudied. The Key Point Analysis (KPA) task formulates argument summarization as representing the summary of a large collection of arguments in the form of concise sentences in bullet-style format, called key points. A sub-task of KPA, called Key Point Generation (KPG), focuses on generating these key points given the arguments. This paper introduces a novel extractive approach for key point generation, that outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods for the task. Our method utilizes an extractive clustering based approach that offers concise, high quality generated key points with higher coverage of reference summaries, and less redundant outputs. In addition, we show that the existing evaluation metrics for summarization such as ROUGE are incapable of differentiating between generated key points of different qualities. To this end, we propose a new evaluation metric for assessing the generated key points by their coverage. Our code can be accessed online.

Related papers

• Exploring Key Point Analysis with Pairwise Generation and Graph Partitioning [61.73411954056032]
  Key Point Analysis (KPA) continues to be a significant and unresolved issue within the field of argument mining. We propose a novel approach for KPA with pairwise generation and graph partitioning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T13:44:29Z)
• Open-Vocabulary Animal Keypoint Detection with Semantic-feature Matching [77.97246496316515]
  Open-Vocabulary Keypoint Detection (OVKD) task is innovatively designed to use text prompts for identifying arbitrary keypoints across any species. We have developed a novel framework named Open-Vocabulary Keypoint Detection with Semantic-feature Matching (KDSM) This framework combines vision and language models, creating an interplay between language features and local keypoint visual features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T07:42:41Z)
• From Key Points to Key Point Hierarchy: Structured and Expressive Opinion Summarization [9.567280503274226]
  Key Point Analysis (KPA) has been recently proposed for deriving fine-grained insights from collections of textual comments. We introduce the task of organizing a given set of key points into a hierarchy, according to their specificity. We develop ThinkP, a high quality benchmark dataset of key point hierarchies for business and product reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T16:45:44Z)
• Do You Hear The People Sing? Key Point Analysis via Iterative Clustering and Abstractive Summarisation [12.548947151123555]
  Argument summarisation is a promising but currently under-explored field. One of the main challenges in Key Point Analysis is finding high-quality key point candidates. evaluating key points is crucial in ensuring that the automatically generated summaries are useful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T12:43:29Z)
• KPEval: Towards Fine-Grained Semantic-Based Keyphrase Evaluation [69.57018875757622]
  We propose KPEval, a comprehensive evaluation framework consisting of four critical aspects: reference agreement, faithfulness, diversity, and utility. Using KPEval, we re-evaluate 23 keyphrase systems and discover that established model comparison results have blind-spots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T17:45:38Z)
• Comparing Methods for Extractive Summarization of Call Centre Dialogue [77.34726150561087]
  We experimentally compare several such methods by using them to produce summaries of calls, and evaluating these summaries objectively. We found that TopicSum and Lead-N outperform the other summarisation methods, whilst BERTSum received comparatively lower scores in both subjective and objective evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-06T13:16:02Z)
• Object Localization under Single Coarse Point Supervision [107.46800858130658]
  We propose a POL method using coarse point annotations, relaxing the supervision signals from accurate key points to freely spotted points. CPR constructs point bags, selects semantic-correlated points, and produces semantic center points through multiple instance learning (MIL) In this way, CPR defines a weakly supervised evolution procedure, which ensures training high-performance object localizer under coarse point supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T14:14:11Z)
• Unsupervised Summarization for Chat Logs with Topic-Oriented Ranking and Context-Aware Auto-Encoders [59.038157066874255]
  We propose a novel framework called RankAE to perform chat summarization without employing manually labeled data. RankAE consists of a topic-oriented ranking strategy that selects topic utterances according to centrality and diversity simultaneously. A denoising auto-encoder is designed to generate succinct but context-informative summaries based on the selected utterances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T07:31:17Z)
• Quantitative Argument Summarization and Beyond: Cross-Domain Key Point Analysis [17.875273745811775]
  We develop a method for automatic extraction of key points, which enables fully automatic analysis. We demonstrate that the applicability of key point analysis goes well beyond argumentation data. An additional contribution is an in-depth evaluation of argument-to-key point matching models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-11T23:01:51Z)
• From Arguments to Key Points: Towards Automatic Argument Summarization [17.875273745811775]
  We show that a small number of key points per topic is typically sufficient for covering the vast majority of the arguments. Furthermore, we found that a domain expert can often predict these key points in advance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T16:24:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.