The Framework of a Design Process Language
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13721v1
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 17:20:19 GMT
- Title: The Framework of a Design Process Language
- Authors: Arnulf Hagen,
- Abstract summary: The thesis develops a view of design in a concept formation framework.
It outlines a language to describe both the object of the design and the process of designing.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The thesis develops a view of design in a concept formation framework and outlines a language to describe both the object of the design and the process of designing. The unknown object at the outset of the design work may be seen as an unknown concept that the designer is to define. Throughout the process, she develops a description of this object by relating it to known concepts. The search stops when the designer is satisfied that the design specification is complete enough to satisfy the requirements from it once built. It is then a collection of propositions that all contribute towards defining the design object - a collection of sentences describing relationships between the object and known concepts. Also, the design process itself may be described by relating known concepts - by organizing known abilities into particular patterns of activation, or mobilization. In view of the demands posed to a language to use in this concept formation process, the framework of a Design Process Language (DPL) is developed. The basis for the language are linguistic categories that act as classes of relations used to combine concepts, containing relations used for describing process and object within the same general system, with some relations being process specific, others being object specific, and with the bulk being used both for process and object description. Another outcome is the distinction of modal relations, or relations describing futurity, possibility, willingness, hypothetical events, and the like. The design process almost always includes aspects such as these, and it is thus necessary for a language facilitating design process description to support such relationships to be constructed. The DPL is argued to be a foundation whereupon to build a language that can be used for enabling computers to be more useful - act more intelligently - in the design process.
Related papers
- Design Obligations for Software, with Examples from Data Abstraction and Adaptive Systems [1.2691047660244337]
semantic expectations may apply not only at the code level, but also to more abstract system structures such as software architectures.
Unfortunately, these expectations are often implicit or documented only informally, so they are challenging to discover, let alone uphold.
I introduce the idea of 'design obligations', which are constraints on allowable designs within a given design paradigm that help to assure appropriate use of the paradigm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-06T02:17:29Z) - I-Design: Personalized LLM Interior Designer [57.00412237555167]
I-Design is a personalized interior designer that allows users to generate and visualize their design goals through natural language communication.
I-Design starts with a team of large language model agents that engage in dialogues and logical reasoning with one another.
The final design is then constructed in 3D by retrieving and integrating assets from an existing object database.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-03T16:17:53Z) - A knowledge-driven framework for synthesizing designs from modular
components [0.13154296174423616]
We propose a use-case knowledge-driven framework to automate the implementation step.
In particular, the framework catalogues the acquired knowledge and the design concept.
We implemented the framework as a plugin for the CAD software Autodesk Fusion 360.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-30T13:16:47Z) - Text-to-Image Generation for Abstract Concepts [76.32278151607763]
We propose a framework of Text-to-Image generation for Abstract Concepts (TIAC)
The abstract concept is clarified into a clear intent with a detailed definition to avoid ambiguity.
The concept-dependent form is retrieved from an LLM-extracted form pattern set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-26T02:22:39Z) - CoSMo: A constructor specification language for Abstract Wikipedia's
content selection process [2.298932494750101]
Representing snippets of information abstractly is a task that needs to be performed for various purposes.
For the Abstract Wikipedia project, requirements analysis revealed that such an abstract representation requires multilingual modelling.
There is no modelling language that meets either of the three features, let alone a combination.
Following a rigorous language design process, we created CoSMo, a novel sc Content sc Selection sc Modeling language.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-01T13:57:23Z) - Embodied Concept Learner: Self-supervised Learning of Concepts and
Mapping through Instruction Following [101.55727845195969]
We propose Embodied Learner Concept (ECL) in an interactive 3D environment.
A robot agent can ground visual concepts, build semantic maps and plan actions to complete tasks.
ECL is fully transparent and step-by-step interpretable in long-term planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-07T17:59:34Z) - Object-Oriented Requirements: a Unified Framework for Specifications,
Scenarios and Tests [63.37657467996478]
Article shows that the concept of class is general enough to describe not only "objects" in a narrow sense but also scenarios such as use cases and user stories.
Having a single framework opens the way to requirements that enjoy the benefits of both approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-06T02:47:20Z) - Identifying concept libraries from language about object structure [56.83719358616503]
We leverage natural language descriptions for a diverse set of 2K procedurally generated objects to identify the parts people use.
We formalize our problem as search over a space of program libraries that contain different part concepts.
By combining naturalistic language at scale with structured program representations, we discover a fundamental information-theoretic tradeoff governing the part concepts people name.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-11T17:49:25Z) - Towards an Explanation Space to Align Humans and Explainable-AI Teamwork [0.0]
This paper proposes a formative architecture that defines the explanation space from a user-inspired perspective.
The architecture comprises five intertwined components to outline explanation requirements for a task.
We present the Abstracted Explanation Space, a modeling tool that aggregates the architecture's components to support designers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-02T23:17:29Z) - Interpretable Visual Reasoning via Induced Symbolic Space [75.95241948390472]
We study the problem of concept induction in visual reasoning, i.e., identifying concepts and their hierarchical relationships from question-answer pairs associated with images.
We first design a new framework named object-centric compositional attention model (OCCAM) to perform the visual reasoning task with object-level visual features.
We then come up with a method to induce concepts of objects and relations using clues from the attention patterns between objects' visual features and question words.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-23T18:21:49Z) - Intelligent requirements engineering from natural language and their
chaining toward CAD models [0.6091702876917279]
This paper assumes that design language plays an important role in how designers design and on the creativity of designers.
Designers use and develop models as an aid to thinking, a focus for discussion and decision-making and a means of evaluating the reliability of the proposals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-14T17:53:01Z) - Expressiveness and machine processability of Knowledge Organization
Systems (KOS): An analysis of concepts and relations [0.0]
The potential of both the expressiveness and machine processability of each Knowledge Organization System is extensively regulated by its structural rules.
Ontologies explicitly define diverse types of relations, and are by their nature machine-processable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-11T12:35:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.