Does Your Neural Code Completion Model Use My Code? A Membership Inference Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14296v2
• Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 13:59:47 GMT
• Title: Does Your Neural Code Completion Model Use My Code? A Membership Inference Approach
• Authors: Yao Wan, Guanghua Wan, Shijie Zhang, Hongyu Zhang, Pan Zhou, Hai Jin, Lichao Sun,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the legal and ethical issues of current neural code completion models. We tailor a membership inference approach (termed CodeMI) that was originally crafted for classification tasks. We evaluate the effectiveness of this adapted approach across a diverse array of neural code completion models.
• Score: 66.51005288743153
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent years have witnessed significant progress in developing deep learning-based models for automated code completion. Although using source code in GitHub has been a common practice for training deep-learning-based models for code completion, it may induce some legal and ethical issues such as copyright infringement. In this paper, we investigate the legal and ethical issues of current neural code completion models by answering the following question: Is my code used to train your neural code completion model? To this end, we tailor a membership inference approach (termed CodeMI) that was originally crafted for classification tasks to a more challenging task of code completion. In particular, since the target code completion models perform as opaque black boxes, preventing access to their training data and parameters, we opt to train multiple shadow models to mimic their behavior. The acquired posteriors from these shadow models are subsequently employed to train a membership classifier. Subsequently, the membership classifier can be effectively employed to deduce the membership status of a given code sample based on the output of a target code completion model. We comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of this adapted approach across a diverse array of neural code completion models, (i.e., LSTM-based, CodeGPT, CodeGen, and StarCoder). Experimental results reveal that the LSTM-based and CodeGPT models suffer the membership leakage issue, which can be easily detected by our proposed membership inference approach with an accuracy of 0.842, and 0.730, respectively. Interestingly, our experiments also show that the data membership of current large language models of code, e.g., CodeGen and StarCoder, is difficult to detect, leaving ampler space for further improvement. Finally, we also try to explain the findings from the perspective of model memorization.

Related papers

• OpenCoder: The Open Cookbook for Top-Tier Code Large Language Models [70.72097493954067]
  Large language models (LLMs) for code have become indispensable in various domains, including code generation, reasoning tasks and agent systems. While open-access code LLMs are increasingly approaching the performance levels of proprietary models, high-quality code LLMs remain limited. We introduce OpenCoder, a top-tier code LLM that not only achieves performance comparable to leading models but also serves as an "open cookbook" for the research community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T17:47:25Z)
• VersiCode: Towards Version-controllable Code Generation [58.82709231906735]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have made tremendous strides in code generation, but existing research fails to account for the dynamic nature of software development. We propose two novel tasks aimed at bridging this gap: version-specific code completion (VSCC) and version-aware code migration (VACM) We conduct an extensive evaluation on VersiCode, which reveals that version-controllable code generation is indeed a significant challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T16:15:06Z)
• StepCoder: Improve Code Generation with Reinforcement Learning from Compiler Feedback [58.20547418182074]
  We introduce StepCoder, a novel framework for code generation, consisting of two main components. CCCS addresses the exploration challenge by breaking the long sequences code generation task into a Curriculum of Code Completion Subtasks. FGO only optimize the model by masking the unexecuted code segments to provide Fine-Grained Optimization. Our method improves the ability to explore the output space and outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in corresponding benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T13:14:31Z)
• Enriching Source Code with Contextual Data for Code Completion Models: An Empirical Study [4.438873396405334]
  We aim to answer whether making code easier to understand through using contextual data improves the performance of pre-trained code language models for the task of code completion. For comments, we find that the models perform better in the presence of multi-line comments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T17:09:14Z)
• CodeExp: Explanatory Code Document Generation [94.43677536210465]
  Existing code-to-text generation models produce only high-level summaries of code. We conduct a human study to identify the criteria for high-quality explanatory docstring for code. We present a multi-stage fine-tuning strategy and baseline models for the task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T18:05:44Z)
• Enhancing Semantic Code Search with Multimodal Contrastive Learning and Soft Data Augmentation [50.14232079160476]
  We propose a new approach with multimodal contrastive learning and soft data augmentation for code search. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on a large-scale dataset with six programming languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-07T08:49:27Z)
• What do pre-trained code models know about code? [9.60966128833701]
  We use diagnostic tasks called probes to investigate pre-trained code models. BERT (pre-trained on English), CodeBERT and CodeBERTa (pre-trained on source code, and natural language documentation), and GraphCodeBERT (pre-trained on source code with dataflow) are investigated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-25T16:20:17Z)
• Toward Less Hidden Cost of Code Completion with Acceptance and Ranking Models [12.736207952790618]
  We develop an ensemble framework that can combine results from multiple models to draw merits and offset defects of each model. This paper conducts a coding simulation to collect data from code context and different code completion models. We propose a new code completion evaluation metric, Benefit-Cost Ratio(BCR), taking into account the benefit of keystrokes saving and hidden cost of completion list browsing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-26T03:02:49Z)
• InferCode: Self-Supervised Learning of Code Representations by Predicting Subtrees [17.461451218469062]
  This paper proposes InferCode to overcome the limitation by adapting the self-language learning mechanism to build source code model. Subtrees in ASTs are treated with InferCode as the labels for training code representations without any human labeling effort or the overhead of expensive graph construction. Compared to previous code learning techniques applied to the same downstream tasks, such as Code2Vec, Code2Seq, ASTNN, higher performance results are achieved using our pre-trained InferCode model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-13T10:33:41Z)
• Towards Full-line Code Completion with Neural Language Models [25.458883198815393]
  We discuss the probability of directly completing a whole line of code instead of a single token. Recent neural language models have been adopted as a preferred approach for code completion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-18T03:12:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.