VulEval: Towards Repository-Level Evaluation of Software Vulnerability Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15596v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 02:16:11 GMT
• Title: VulEval: Towards Repository-Level Evaluation of Software Vulnerability Detection
• Authors: Xin-Cheng Wen, Xinchen Wang, Yujia Chen, Ruida Hu, David Lo, Cuiyun Gao,
• Abstract summary: repository-level evaluation system named textbfVulEval aims at evaluating the detection performance of inter- and intra-procedural vulnerabilities simultaneously. VulEval consists of a large-scale dataset, with a total of 4,196 CVE entries, 232,239 functions, and corresponding 4,699 repository-level source code in C/C++ programming languages.
• Score: 14.312197590230994
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep Learning (DL)-based methods have proven to be effective for software vulnerability detection, with a potential for substantial productivity enhancements for detecting vulnerabilities. Current methods mainly focus on detecting single functions (i.e., intra-procedural vulnerabilities), ignoring the more complex inter-procedural vulnerability detection scenarios in practice. For example, developers routinely engage with program analysis to detect vulnerabilities that span multiple functions within repositories. In addition, the widely-used benchmark datasets generally contain only intra-procedural vulnerabilities, leaving the assessment of inter-procedural vulnerability detection capabilities unexplored. To mitigate the issues, we propose a repository-level evaluation system, named \textbf{VulEval}, aiming at evaluating the detection performance of inter- and intra-procedural vulnerabilities simultaneously. Specifically, VulEval consists of three interconnected evaluation tasks: \textbf{(1) Function-Level Vulnerability Detection}, aiming at detecting intra-procedural vulnerability given a code snippet; \textbf{(2) Vulnerability-Related Dependency Prediction}, aiming at retrieving the most relevant dependencies from call graphs for providing developers with explanations about the vulnerabilities; and \textbf{(3) Repository-Level Vulnerability Detection}, aiming at detecting inter-procedural vulnerabilities by combining with the dependencies identified in the second task. VulEval also consists of a large-scale dataset, with a total of 4,196 CVE entries, 232,239 functions, and corresponding 4,699 repository-level source code in C/C++ programming languages. Our analysis highlights the current progress and future directions for software vulnerability detection.

Related papers

• Collaborative Knowledge Infusion for Low-resource Stance Detection [83.88515573352795]
  Target-related knowledge is often needed to assist stance detection models. We propose a collaborative knowledge infusion approach for low-resource stance detection tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T08:32:14Z)
• Toward Improved Deep Learning-based Vulnerability Detection [6.212044762686268]
  Vulnerabilities in datasets have to be represented in a certain way, e.g., code lines, functions, or program slices within which the vulnerabilities exist. The detectors learn how base units can be vulnerable and then predict whether other base units are vulnerable. We have hypothesized that this focus on individual base units harms the ability of the detectors to properly detect those vulnerabilities that span multiple base units. We present our study and a framework that can be used to help DL-based detectors toward the proper inclusion of MBU vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T14:57:28Z)
• On the Effectiveness of Function-Level Vulnerability Detectors for Inter-Procedural Vulnerabilities [28.57872406228216]
  We propose a tool dubbed VulTrigger for identifying vulnerability-triggering statements across functions. Experimental results show that VulTrigger can effectively identify vulnerability-triggering statements and inter-procedural vulnerabilities. Our findings include: (i) inter-procedural vulnerabilities are prevalent with an average of 2.8 inter-procedural layers; and (ii) function-level vulnerability detectors are much less effective in detecting to-be-patched functions of inter-procedural vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T07:32:11Z)
• The Vulnerability Is in the Details: Locating Fine-grained Information of Vulnerable Code Identified by Graph-based Detectors [33.395068754566935]
  VULEXPLAINER is a tool for locating vulnerability-critical code lines from coarse-level vulnerable code snippets. It can flag the vulnerability-triggering code statements with an accuracy of around 90% against eight common C/C++ vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-05T10:15:04Z)
• ASSERT: Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models [65.79770974145983]
  ASSERT, Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming, consists of three methods -- semantically aligned augmentation, target bootstrapping, and adversarial knowledge injection. We partition our prompts into four safety domains for a fine-grained analysis of how the domain affects model performance. We find statistically significant performance differences of up to 11% in absolute classification accuracy among semantically related scenarios and error rates of up to 19% absolute error in zero-shot adversarial settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T17:10:28Z)
• DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detection [55.70982767084996]
  A critical yet frequently overlooked challenge in the field of deepfake detection is the lack of a standardized, unified, comprehensive benchmark. We present the first comprehensive benchmark for deepfake detection, called DeepfakeBench, which offers three key contributions. DeepfakeBench contains 15 state-of-the-art detection methods, 9CL datasets, a series of deepfake detection evaluation protocols and analysis tools, as well as comprehensive evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T01:34:41Z)
• Deep-Learning-based Vulnerability Detection in Binary Executables [0.0]
  We present a supervised deep learning approach using recurrent neural networks for the application of vulnerability detection based on binary executables. A dataset with 50,651 samples of vulnerable code in the form of a standardized LLVM Intermediate Representation is used. A binary classification was established for detecting the presence of an arbitrary vulnerability, and a multi-class model was trained for the identification of the exact vulnerability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T10:33:33Z)
• VELVET: a noVel Ensemble Learning approach to automatically locate VulnErable sTatements [62.93814803258067]
  This paper presents VELVET, a novel ensemble learning approach to locate vulnerable statements in source code. Our model combines graph-based and sequence-based neural networks to successfully capture the local and global context of a program graph. VELVET achieves 99.6% and 43.6% top-1 accuracy over synthetic data and real-world data, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T22:45:27Z)
• Exploring Robustness of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentation [74.05906222376608]
  We propose adversarial self-supervision UDA (or ASSUDA) that maximizes the agreement between clean images and their adversarial examples by a contrastive loss in the output space. This paper is rooted in two observations: (i) the robustness of UDA methods in semantic segmentation remains unexplored, which pose a security concern in this field; and (ii) although commonly used self-supervision (e.g., rotation and jigsaw) benefits image tasks such as classification and recognition, they fail to provide the critical supervision signals that could learn discriminative representation for segmentation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-23T01:50:44Z)
• Increasing the Confidence of Deep Neural Networks by Coverage Analysis [71.57324258813674]
  This paper presents a lightweight monitoring architecture based on coverage paradigms to enhance the model against different unsafe inputs. Experimental results show that the proposed approach is effective in detecting both powerful adversarial examples and out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-28T16:38:26Z)
• $\mu$VulDeePecker: A Deep Learning-Based System for Multiclass Vulnerability Detection [24.98991662345816]
  We propose the first deep learning-based system for multiclass vulnerability detection, dubbed $mu$VulDeePecker. The key insight underlying $mu$VulDeePecker is the concept of code attention, which can capture information that can help pinpoint types of vulnerabilities. Experiments show that $mu$VulDeePecker is effective for multiclass vulnerability detection and that accommodating control-dependence can lead to higher detection capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-08T01:47:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.