A Survey of Third-Party Library Security Research in Application Software

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17955v1
• Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 16:35:02 GMT
• Title: A Survey of Third-Party Library Security Research in Application Software
• Authors: Jia Zeng, Dan Han, Yaling Zhu, Yangzhong Wang, Fangchen Weng,
• Abstract summary: With the widespread use of third-party libraries, associated security risks and potential vulnerabilities are increasingly apparent. Malicious attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities to infiltrate systems, execute unauthorized operations, or steal sensitive information. Research on third-party libraries in software becomes paramount to address this growing security challenge.
• Score: 3.280510821619164
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In the current software development environment, third-party libraries play a crucial role. They provide developers with rich functionality and convenient solutions, speeding up the pace and efficiency of software development. However, with the widespread use of third-party libraries, associated security risks and potential vulnerabilities are increasingly apparent. Malicious attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities to infiltrate systems, execute unauthorized operations, or steal sensitive information, posing a severe threat to software security. Research on third-party libraries in software becomes paramount to address this growing security challenge. Numerous research findings exist regarding third-party libraries' usage, ecosystem, detection, and fortification defenses. Understanding the usage and ecosystem of third-party libraries helps developers comprehend the potential risks they bring and select trustworthy libraries. Third-party library detection tools aid developers in automatically discovering third-party libraries in software, facilitating their management. In addition to detection, fortification defenses are also indispensable. This article profoundly investigates and analyzes this literature, summarizing current research achievements and future development directions. It aims to provide practical and valuable insights for developers and researchers, jointly promoting the healthy development of software ecosystems and better-protecting software from security threats.

Related papers

• Agent-Driven Automatic Software Improvement [55.2480439325792]
  This research proposal aims to explore innovative solutions by focusing on the deployment of agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) The iterative nature of agents, which allows for continuous learning and adaptation, can help surpass common challenges in code generation. We aim to use the iterative feedback in these systems to further fine-tune the LLMs underlying the agents, becoming better aligned to the task of automated software improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T15:45:22Z)
• SoK: A Defense-Oriented Evaluation of Software Supply Chain Security [3.165193382160046]
  We argue that the next stage of software supply chain security research and development will benefit greatly from a defense-oriented approach. This paper introduces the AStRA model, a framework for representing fundamental software supply chain elements and their causal relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T18:53:48Z)
• DevPhish: Exploring Social Engineering in Software Supply Chain Attacks on Developers [0.3754193239793766]
  adversaries utilize Social Engineering (SocE) techniques specifically aimed at software developers. This paper aims to comprehensively explore the existing and emerging SocE tactics employed by adversaries to trick Software Engineers (SWEs) into delivering malicious software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T15:24:43Z)
• A Landscape Study of Open Source and Proprietary Tools for Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) [3.1190983209295076]
  Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) is a repository that inventories all third-party components and dependencies used in an application. Recent supply chain breaches underscore the urgent need to enhance software security and vulnerability risks. This research paper conducts an empirical analysis to assess the current landscape of open-source and proprietary tools related to SBOM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T00:36:20Z)
• Prioritizing Safeguarding Over Autonomy: Risks of LLM Agents for Science [65.77763092833348]
  Intelligent agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial promise in autonomously conducting experiments and facilitating scientific discoveries across various disciplines. While their capabilities are promising, these agents also introduce novel vulnerabilities that demand careful consideration for safety. This paper conducts a thorough examination of vulnerabilities in LLM-based agents within scientific domains, shedding light on potential risks associated with their misuse and emphasizing the need for safety measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T18:54:07Z)
• Security in Online Freelance Software Development: A case for Distributed Security Responsibility [10.123578004071952]
  There is paucity of research on how freelance developers adhere to security practices. We argue for the case of distributed security responsibilities in online freelance environment. Research has the potential to bring forth existing security solutions to wider developer community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T10:35:27Z)
• Analyzing Maintenance Activities of Software Libraries [65.268245109828]
  Industrial applications heavily integrate open-source software libraries nowadays. I want to introduce an automatic monitoring approach for industrial applications to identify open-source dependencies that show negative signs regarding their current or future maintenance activities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T16:51:25Z)
• CodeLMSec Benchmark: Systematically Evaluating and Finding Security Vulnerabilities in Black-Box Code Language Models [58.27254444280376]
  Large language models (LLMs) for automatic code generation have achieved breakthroughs in several programming tasks. Training data for these models is usually collected from the Internet (e.g., from open-source repositories) and is likely to contain faults and security vulnerabilities. This unsanitized training data can cause the language models to learn these vulnerabilities and propagate them during the code generation procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T11:54:07Z)
• Developing Hands-on Labs for Source Code Vulnerability Detection with AI [0.0]
  We propose a framework including learning modules and hands on labs to guide future IT professionals towards developing secure programming habits. This thesis our goal is to design learning modules with a set of hands on labs that will introduce students to secure programming practices using source code and log file analysis tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-01T20:53:58Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)
• SafePILCO: a software tool for safe and data-efficient policy synthesis [67.17251247987187]
  SafePILCO is a software tool for safe and data-efficient policy search with reinforcement learning. It extends the known PILCO algorithm, originally written in Python, to support safe learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-07T17:17:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.