Generating Situated Reflection Triggers about Alternative Solution Paths: A Case Study of Generative AI for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18262v1
• Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 17:56:14 GMT
• Title: Generating Situated Reflection Triggers about Alternative Solution Paths: A Case Study of Generative AI for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
• Authors: Atharva Naik, Jessica Ruhan Yin, Anusha Kamath, Qianou Ma, Sherry Tongshuang Wu, Charles Murray, Christopher Bogart, Majd Sakr, Carolyn P. Rose,
• Abstract summary: We present a proof-of-concept application to offer students dynamic and contextualized feedback. Specifically, we augment an Online Programming Exercise bot for a college-level Cloud Computing course with ChatGPT. We demonstrate that LLMs can be used to generate highly situated reflection triggers that incorporate details of the collaborative discussion happening in context.
• Score: 3.2721068185888127
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: An advantage of Large Language Models (LLMs) is their contextualization capability - providing different responses based on student inputs like solution strategy or prior discussion, to potentially better engage students than standard feedback. We present a design and evaluation of a proof-of-concept LLM application to offer students dynamic and contextualized feedback. Specifically, we augment an Online Programming Exercise bot for a college-level Cloud Computing course with ChatGPT, which offers students contextualized reflection triggers during a collaborative query optimization task in database design. We demonstrate that LLMs can be used to generate highly situated reflection triggers that incorporate details of the collaborative discussion happening in context. We discuss in depth the exploration of the design space of the triggers and their correspondence with the learning objectives as well as the impact on student learning in a pilot study with 34 students.

Related papers

• Oversight in Action: Experiences with Instructor-Moderated LLM Responses in an Online Discussion Forum [2.86800540498016]
  This paper presents the design, deployment, and evaluation of a bot' module that is controlled by the instructor. The bot generates draft responses to student questions, which are reviewed, modified, and approved before release. We report our experiences using this tool in a 12-week second-year software engineering course on object-oriented programming.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T08:17:33Z)
• Exploring Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues using LLMs [49.18567856499736]
  We investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can be supportive of open-ended dialogue tutoring. We apply a range of knowledge tracing (KT) methods on the resulting labeled data to track student knowledge levels over an entire dialogue. We conduct experiments on two tutoring dialogue datasets, and show that a novel yet simple LLM-based method, LLMKT, significantly outperforms existing KT methods in predicting student response correctness in dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T22:31:39Z)
• ChatGPT in Data Visualization Education: A Student Perspective [19.58123915686711]
  This work explores the impact of such technology on student learning in an interdisciplinary, project-oriented data visualization course. Students engaged with ChatGPT across four distinct projects, designing and implementing data visualizations using a variety of tools such as Tableau, D3, and Vega-lite. Our analysis examined the advantages and barriers of using ChatGPT, students' querying behavior, the types of assistance sought, and its impact on assignment outcomes and engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T02:40:20Z)
• Analyzing LLM Usage in an Advanced Computing Class in India [4.580708389528142]
  This study examines the use of large language models (LLMs) by undergraduate and graduate students for programming assignments in advanced computing classes. We conducted a comprehensive analysis involving 411 students from a Distributed Systems class at an Indian university.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T12:06:56Z)
• A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words: Exploring Diagram and Video-Based OOP Exercises to Counter LLM Over-Reliance [2.1490831374964587]
  Large language models (LLMs) can effectively solve a range of more complex object-oriented programming (OOP) exercises with text-based specifications. This raises concerns about academic integrity, as students might use these models to complete assignments unethically. We propose an innovative approach to formulating OOP tasks using diagrams and videos, as a way to foster problem-solving and deter students from a copy-and-prompt approach in OOP courses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T10:21:29Z)
• Students' Perceptions and Preferences of Generative Artificial Intelligence Feedback for Programming [15.372316943507506]
  We generated automated feedback using the ChatGPT API for four lab assignments in an introductory computer science class. Students perceived the feedback as aligning well with formative feedback guidelines established by Shute. Students generally expected specific and corrective feedback with sufficient code examples, but had diverged opinions on the tone of the feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-17T22:26:53Z)
• LMRL Gym: Benchmarks for Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning with Language Models [56.25156596019168]
  This paper introduces the LMRL-Gym benchmark for evaluating multi-turn RL for large language models (LLMs) Our benchmark consists of 8 different language tasks, which require multiple rounds of language interaction and cover a range of tasks in open-ended dialogue and text games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T03:59:31Z)
• Zero-Shot Goal-Directed Dialogue via RL on Imagined Conversations [70.7884839812069]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful and general solutions to many natural language tasks. However, many of the most important applications of language generation are interactive, where an agent has to talk to a person to reach a desired outcome. In this work, we explore a new method for adapting LLMs with RL for such goal-directed dialogue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T18:45:16Z)
• Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback [127.75419038610455]
  Large language models (LLMs) are able to generate human-like, fluent responses for many downstream tasks. This paper proposes a LLM-Augmenter system, which augments a black-box LLM with a set of plug-and-play modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T18:48:43Z)
• Learning an Effective Context-Response Matching Model with Self-Supervised Tasks for Retrieval-based Dialogues [88.73739515457116]
  We introduce four self-supervised tasks including next session prediction, utterance restoration, incoherence detection and consistency discrimination. We jointly train the PLM-based response selection model with these auxiliary tasks in a multi-task manner. Experiment results indicate that the proposed auxiliary self-supervised tasks bring significant improvement for multi-turn response selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T08:44:46Z)
• Object Relational Graph with Teacher-Recommended Learning for Video Captioning [92.48299156867664]
  We propose a complete video captioning system including both a novel model and an effective training strategy. Specifically, we propose an object relational graph (ORG) based encoder, which captures more detailed interaction features to enrich visual representation. Meanwhile, we design a teacher-recommended learning (TRL) method to make full use of the successful external language model (ELM) to integrate the abundant linguistic knowledge into the caption model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T15:34:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.