User Welfare Optimization in Recommender Systems with Competing Content Creators

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18319v1
• Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 21:09:52 GMT
• Title: User Welfare Optimization in Recommender Systems with Competing Content Creators
• Authors: Fan Yao, Yiming Liao, Mingzhe Wu, Chuanhao Li, Yan Zhu, James Yang, Qifan Wang, Haifeng Xu, Hongning Wang,
• Abstract summary: In this study, we perform system-side user welfare optimization under a competitive game setting among content creators. We propose an algorithmic solution for the platform, which dynamically computes a sequence of weights for each user based on their satisfaction of the recommended content. These weights are then utilized to design mechanisms that adjust the recommendation policy or the post-recommendation rewards, thereby influencing creators' content production strategies.
• Score: 65.25721571688369
• License:
• Abstract: Driven by the new economic opportunities created by the creator economy, an increasing number of content creators rely on and compete for revenue generated from online content recommendation platforms. This burgeoning competition reshapes the dynamics of content distribution and profoundly impacts long-term user welfare on the platform. However, the absence of a comprehensive picture of global user preference distribution often traps the competition, especially the creators, in states that yield sub-optimal user welfare. To encourage creators to best serve a broad user population with relevant content, it becomes the platform's responsibility to leverage its information advantage regarding user preference distribution to accurately signal creators. In this study, we perform system-side user welfare optimization under a competitive game setting among content creators. We propose an algorithmic solution for the platform, which dynamically computes a sequence of weights for each user based on their satisfaction of the recommended content. These weights are then utilized to design mechanisms that adjust the recommendation policy or the post-recommendation rewards, thereby influencing creators' content production strategies. To validate the effectiveness of our proposed method, we report our findings from a series of experiments, including: 1. a proof-of-concept negative example illustrating how creators' strategies converge towards sub-optimal states without platform intervention; 2. offline experiments employing our proposed intervention mechanisms on diverse datasets; and 3. results from a three-week online experiment conducted on a leading short-video recommendation platform.

Related papers

• Unveiling User Satisfaction and Creator Productivity Trade-Offs in Recommendation Platforms [68.51708490104687]
  We show that a purely relevance-driven policy with low exploration strength boosts short-term user satisfaction but undermines the long-term richness of the content pool. Our findings reveal a fundamental trade-off between immediate user satisfaction and overall content production on platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T07:19:22Z)
• Bypassing the Popularity Bias: Repurposing Models for Better Long-Tail Recommendation [0.0]
  We aim to achieve a more equitable distribution of exposure among publishers on an online content platform. We propose a novel approach of repurposing existing components of an industrial recommender system to deliver valuable exposure to underrepresented publishers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T15:40:55Z)
• Incentivizing High-Quality Content in Online Recommender Systems [80.19930280144123]
  We study the game between producers and analyze the content created at equilibrium. We show that standard online learning algorithms, such as Hedge and EXP3, unfortunately incentivize producers to create low-quality content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T00:55:10Z)
• Online Learning in a Creator Economy [91.55437924091844]
  We study the creator economy as a three-party game between the users, platform, and content creators. We analyze two families of contracts: return-based contracts and feature-based contracts. We show that under smoothness assumptions, the joint optimization of return-based contracts and recommendation policy provides a regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T01:58:13Z)
• How Bad is Top-$K$ Recommendation under Competing Content Creators? [43.2268992294178]
  We study the user welfare guarantee through the lens of Price of Anarchy. We show that the fraction of user welfare loss due to creator competition is always upper bounded by a small constant depending on $K$ and randomness in user decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T19:37:35Z)
• Supply-Side Equilibria in Recommender Systems [43.140112226575646]
  We investigate supply-side equilibria in personalized content recommender systems. Two key features of our model are that the producer decision space is multi-dimensional and the user base is heterogeneous. We show that specialization can enable producers to achieve positive profit at equilibrium.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-27T17:52:16Z)
• Feedback Shaping: A Modeling Approach to Nurture Content Creation [10.31854532203776]
  We propose a modeling approach to predict how feedback from content consumers incentivizes creators. We then leverage this model to optimize the newsfeed experience for content creators by reshaping the feedback distribution. We present a deployed use case on the LinkedIn newsfeed, where we used this approach to improve content creation significantly without compromising the consumers' experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T22:53:16Z)
• Dynamic Knapsack Optimization Towards Efficient Multi-Channel Sequential Advertising [52.3825928886714]
  We formulate the sequential advertising strategy optimization as a dynamic knapsack problem. We propose a theoretically guaranteed bilevel optimization framework, which significantly reduces the solution space of the original optimization space. To improve the exploration efficiency of reinforcement learning, we also devise an effective action space reduction approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T18:50:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.