Holmes: A Benchmark to Assess the Linguistic Competence of Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18923v4
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:08:52 GMT
- Title: Holmes: A Benchmark to Assess the Linguistic Competence of Language Models
- Authors: Andreas Waldis, Yotam Perlitz, Leshem Choshen, Yufang Hou, Iryna Gurevych,
- Abstract summary: We introduce Holmes, a new benchmark designed to assess language models (LMs) linguistic competence.
We use computation-based probing to examine LMs' internal representations regarding distinct linguistic phenomena.
As a result, we meet recent calls to disentangle LMs' linguistic competence from other cognitive abilities.
- Score: 59.627729608055006
- License:
- Abstract: We introduce Holmes, a new benchmark designed to assess language models (LMs) linguistic competence - their unconscious understanding of linguistic phenomena. Specifically, we use classifier-based probing to examine LMs' internal representations regarding distinct linguistic phenomena (e.g., part-of-speech tagging). As a result, we meet recent calls to disentangle LMs' linguistic competence from other cognitive abilities, such as following instructions in prompting-based evaluations. Composing Holmes, we review over 270 probing studies and include more than 200 datasets to assess syntax, morphology, semantics, reasoning, and discourse phenomena. Analyzing over 50 LMs reveals that, aligned with known trends, their linguistic competence correlates with model size. However, surprisingly, model architecture and instruction tuning also significantly influence performance, particularly in morphology and syntax. Finally, we propose FlashHolmes, a streamlined version that reduces the computation load while maintaining high-ranking precision.
Related papers
- From Babbling to Fluency: Evaluating the Evolution of Language Models in Terms of Human Language Acquisition [6.617999710257379]
We propose a three-stage framework to assess the abilities of LMs.
We evaluate the generative capacities of LMs using methods from linguistic research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T06:31:49Z) - Disco-Bench: A Discourse-Aware Evaluation Benchmark for Language
Modelling [70.23876429382969]
We propose a benchmark that can evaluate intra-sentence discourse properties across a diverse set of NLP tasks.
Disco-Bench consists of 9 document-level testsets in the literature domain, which contain rich discourse phenomena.
For linguistic analysis, we also design a diagnostic test suite that can examine whether the target models learn discourse knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-16T15:18:25Z) - Curriculum: A Broad-Coverage Benchmark for Linguistic Phenomena in
Natural Language Understanding [1.827510863075184]
Curriculum is a new format of NLI benchmark for evaluation of broad-coverage linguistic phenomena.
We show that this linguistic-phenomena-driven benchmark can serve as an effective tool for diagnosing model behavior and verifying model learning quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-13T10:32:03Z) - A Latent-Variable Model for Intrinsic Probing [93.62808331764072]
We propose a novel latent-variable formulation for constructing intrinsic probes.
We find empirical evidence that pre-trained representations develop a cross-lingually entangled notion of morphosyntax.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-20T15:01:12Z) - Towards Language Modelling in the Speech Domain Using Sub-word
Linguistic Units [56.52704348773307]
We propose a novel LSTM-based generative speech LM based on linguistic units including syllables and phonemes.
With a limited dataset, orders of magnitude smaller than that required by contemporary generative models, our model closely approximates babbling speech.
We show the effect of training with auxiliary text LMs, multitask learning objectives, and auxiliary articulatory features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-31T22:48:30Z) - A Massively Multilingual Analysis of Cross-linguality in Shared
Embedding Space [61.18554842370824]
In cross-lingual language models, representations for many different languages live in the same space.
We compute a task-based measure of cross-lingual alignment in the form of bitext retrieval performance.
We examine a range of linguistic, quasi-linguistic, and training-related features as potential predictors of these alignment metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-13T21:05:37Z) - Towards Zero-shot Language Modeling [90.80124496312274]
We construct a neural model that is inductively biased towards learning human languages.
We infer this distribution from a sample of typologically diverse training languages.
We harness additional language-specific side information as distant supervision for held-out languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-06T23:49:18Z) - The Rediscovery Hypothesis: Language Models Need to Meet Linguistics [8.293055016429863]
We study whether linguistic knowledge is a necessary condition for good performance of modern language models.
We show that language models that are significantly compressed but perform well on their pretraining objectives retain good scores when probed for linguistic structures.
This result supports the rediscovery hypothesis and leads to the second contribution of our paper: an information-theoretic framework that relates language modeling objective with linguistic information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-02T15:57:39Z) - A Closer Look at Linguistic Knowledge in Masked Language Models: The
Case of Relative Clauses in American English [17.993417004424078]
Transformer-based language models achieve high performance on various tasks, but we still lack understanding of the kind of linguistic knowledge they learn and rely on.
We evaluate three models (BERT, RoBERTa, and ALBERT) testing their grammatical and semantic knowledge by sentence-level probing, diagnostic cases, and masked prediction tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-02T13:25:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.