Adversarial Attacks and Defense for Conversation Entailment Task
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00289v2
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 03:37:08 GMT
- Title: Adversarial Attacks and Defense for Conversation Entailment Task
- Authors: Zhenning Yang, Ryan Krawec, Liang-Yuan Wu,
- Abstract summary: Large language models are vulnerable to low-cost adversarial attacks.
We fine-tune a transformer model to accurately discern the truthfulness of hypotheses.
We introduce an embedding perturbation loss method to bolster the model's robustness.
- Score: 0.49157446832511503
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: As the deployment of NLP systems in critical applications grows, ensuring the robustness of large language models (LLMs) against adversarial attacks becomes increasingly important. Large language models excel in various NLP tasks but remain vulnerable to low-cost adversarial attacks. Focusing on the domain of conversation entailment, where multi-turn dialogues serve as premises to verify hypotheses, we fine-tune a transformer model to accurately discern the truthfulness of these hypotheses. Adversaries manipulate hypotheses through synonym swapping, aiming to deceive the model into making incorrect predictions. To counteract these attacks, we implemented innovative fine-tuning techniques and introduced an embedding perturbation loss method to significantly bolster the model's robustness. Our findings not only emphasize the importance of defending against adversarial attacks in NLP but also highlight the real-world implications, suggesting that enhancing model robustness is critical for reliable NLP applications.
Related papers
- Enhancing adversarial robustness in Natural Language Inference using explanations [41.46494686136601]
We cast the spotlight on the underexplored task of Natural Language Inference (NLI)
We validate the usage of natural language explanation as a model-agnostic defence strategy through extensive experimentation.
We research the correlation of widely used language generation metrics with human perception, in order for them to serve as a proxy towards robust NLI models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-11T17:09:49Z) - MirrorCheck: Efficient Adversarial Defense for Vision-Language Models [55.73581212134293]
We propose a novel, yet elegantly simple approach for detecting adversarial samples in Vision-Language Models.
Our method leverages Text-to-Image (T2I) models to generate images based on captions produced by target VLMs.
Empirical evaluations conducted on different datasets validate the efficacy of our approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T15:55:04Z) - Mutual-modality Adversarial Attack with Semantic Perturbation [81.66172089175346]
We propose a novel approach that generates adversarial attacks in a mutual-modality optimization scheme.
Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art attack methods and can be readily deployed as a plug-and-play solution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-20T05:06:01Z) - SA-Attack: Improving Adversarial Transferability of Vision-Language
Pre-training Models via Self-Augmentation [56.622250514119294]
In contrast to white-box adversarial attacks, transfer attacks are more reflective of real-world scenarios.
We propose a self-augment-based transfer attack method, termed SA-Attack.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-08T09:08:50Z) - Fooling the Textual Fooler via Randomizing Latent Representations [13.77424820701913]
adversarial word-level perturbations are well-studied and effective attack strategies.
We propose a lightweight and attack-agnostic defense whose main goal is to perplex the process of generating an adversarial example.
We empirically demonstrate near state-of-the-art robustness of AdvFooler against representative adversarial word-level attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T06:57:25Z) - In and Out-of-Domain Text Adversarial Robustness via Label Smoothing [64.66809713499576]
We study the adversarial robustness provided by various label smoothing strategies in foundational models for diverse NLP tasks.
Our experiments show that label smoothing significantly improves adversarial robustness in pre-trained models like BERT, against various popular attacks.
We also analyze the relationship between prediction confidence and robustness, showing that label smoothing reduces over-confident errors on adversarial examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-20T14:06:50Z) - A Prompting-based Approach for Adversarial Example Generation and
Robustness Enhancement [18.532308729844598]
We propose a novel prompt-based adversarial attack to compromise NLP models.
We generate adversarial examples via mask-and-filling under the effect of a malicious purpose.
Our training method does not actually generate adversarial samples, it can be applied to large-scale training sets efficiently.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-21T03:21:32Z) - Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of
Language Models [86.02610674750345]
Adversarial GLUE (AdvGLUE) is a new multi-task benchmark to explore and evaluate the vulnerabilities of modern large-scale language models under various types of adversarial attacks.
We apply 14 adversarial attack methods to GLUE tasks to construct AdvGLUE, which is further validated by humans for reliable annotations.
All the language models and robust training methods we tested perform poorly on AdvGLUE, with scores lagging far behind the benign accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-04T12:59:55Z) - Evaluating Deception Detection Model Robustness To Linguistic Variation [10.131671217810581]
We propose an analysis of model robustness against linguistic variation in the setting of deceptive news detection.
We consider two prediction tasks and compare three state-of-the-art embeddings to highlight consistent trends in model performance.
We find that character or mixed ensemble models are the most effective defenses and that character perturbation-based attack tactics are more successful.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-23T17:25:38Z) - Adversarial Attack and Defense of Structured Prediction Models [58.49290114755019]
In this paper, we investigate attacks and defenses for structured prediction tasks in NLP.
The structured output of structured prediction models is sensitive to small perturbations in the input.
We propose a novel and unified framework that learns to attack a structured prediction model using a sequence-to-sequence model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-04T15:54:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.