Uncovering Agendas: A Novel French & English Dataset for Agenda Detection on Social Media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00821v1
• Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 19:02:35 GMT
• Title: Uncovering Agendas: A Novel French & English Dataset for Agenda Detection on Social Media
• Authors: Gregorios Katsios, Ning Sa, Ankita Bhaumik, Tomek Strzalkowski,
• Abstract summary: We present a methodology for detecting specific instances of agenda control through social media where annotated data is limited or non-existent. By treating the task as a textual entailment problem, it is possible to overcome the requirement for a large annotated training dataset.
• Score: 1.4999444543328293
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The behavior and decision making of groups or communities can be dramatically influenced by individuals pushing particular agendas, e.g., to promote or disparage a person or an activity, to call for action, etc.. In the examination of online influence campaigns, particularly those related to important political and social events, scholars often concentrate on identifying the sources responsible for setting and controlling the agenda (e.g., public media). In this article we present a methodology for detecting specific instances of agenda control through social media where annotated data is limited or non-existent. By using a modest corpus of Twitter messages centered on the 2022 French Presidential Elections, we carry out a comprehensive evaluation of various approaches and techniques that can be applied to this problem. Our findings demonstrate that by treating the task as a textual entailment problem, it is possible to overcome the requirement for a large annotated training dataset.

Related papers

• Labeled Datasets for Research on Information Operations [71.34999856621306]
  We present new labeled datasets about 26 campaigns, which contain both IO posts verified by a social media platform and over 13M posts by 303k accounts that discussed similar topics in the same time frames (control data) The datasets will facilitate the study of narratives, network interactions, and engagement strategies employed by coordinated accounts across various campaigns and countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T22:15:01Z)
• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• A Survey of Stance Detection on Social Media: New Directions and Perspectives [50.27382951812502]
  stance detection has emerged as a crucial subfield within affective computing. Recent years have seen a surge of research interest in developing effective stance detection methods. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of stance detection techniques on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T03:06:25Z)
• Uncovering Latent Arguments in Social Media Messaging by Employing LLMs-in-the-Loop Strategy [22.976609127865732]
  Social media has led to a surge in popularity for automated methods of analyzing public opinion. Traditional unsupervised methods for extracting themes from public discourse, such as topic modeling, often reveal overarching patterns that might not capture specific nuances. We propose a generic LLMs-in-the-Loop strategy that leverages the advanced capabilities of Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T03:26:43Z)
• Time Series Analysis of Key Societal Events as Reflected in Complex Social Media Data Streams [0.9790236766474201]
  This study investigates narrative evolution on a niche social media platform GAB and an established messaging service Telegram. Our approach is a novel mode to study multiple social media domains to distil key information which may be obscured otherwise. The main findings are: (1) the time line can be deconstructed to provide useful data features allowing for improved interpretation; (2) a methodology is applied which provides a basis for generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T18:33:56Z)
• Social Convos: Capturing Agendas and Emotions on Social Media [1.6385815610837167]
  We present a novel approach to extract influence indicators from messages circulating among groups of users discussing particular topics. We focus on two influence indicators: the (control of) agenda and the use of emotional language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T19:14:09Z)
• Modeling Political Orientation of Social Media Posts: An Extended Analysis [0.0]
  Developing machine learning models to characterize political polarization on online social media presents significant challenges. These challenges mainly stem from various factors such as the lack of annotated data, presence of noise in social media datasets, and the sheer volume of data. We introduce two methods that leverage on news media bias and post content to label social media posts. We demonstrate that current machine learning models can exhibit improved performance in predicting political orientation of social media posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T03:34:20Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models to Detect Influence Campaigns in Social Media [9.58546889761175]
  Social media influence campaigns pose significant challenges to public discourse and democracy. Traditional detection methods fall short due to the complexity and dynamic nature of social media. We propose a novel detection method using Large Language Models (LLMs) that incorporates both user metadata and network structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T00:25:09Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Topic Classification in the Domain of Public Affairs [65.9077733300329]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to greatly enhance the analysis of public affairs documents. LLMs can be of great use to process domain-specific documents, such as those in the domain of public affairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T13:35:01Z)
• ManiTweet: A New Benchmark for Identifying Manipulation of News on Social Media [74.93847489218008]
  We present a novel task, identifying manipulation of news on social media, which aims to detect manipulation in social media posts and identify manipulated or inserted information. To study this task, we have proposed a data collection schema and curated a dataset called ManiTweet, consisting of 3.6K pairs of tweets and corresponding articles. Our analysis demonstrates that this task is highly challenging, with large language models (LLMs) yielding unsatisfactory performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:40:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.