The high dimensional psychological profile and cultural bias of ChatGPT

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.03387v1
• Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 11:45:59 GMT
• Title: The high dimensional psychological profile and cultural bias of ChatGPT
• Authors: Hang Yuan, Zhongyue Che, Shao Li, Yue Zhang, Xiaomeng Hu, Siyang Luo,
• Abstract summary: This study first measured ChatGPT in 84 dimensions of psychological characteristics. ChatGPT's cultural value patterns are dissimilar to those of various countries/regions worldwide. Analysis of ChatGPT's performance in eight decision-making tasks involving interactions with humans from different countries/regions revealed clear cultural stereotypes.
• Score: 11.607356361021482
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Given the rapid advancement of large-scale language models, artificial intelligence (AI) models, like ChatGPT, are playing an increasingly prominent role in human society. However, to ensure that artificial intelligence models benefit human society, we must first fully understand the similarities and differences between the human-like characteristics exhibited by artificial intelligence models and real humans, as well as the cultural stereotypes and biases that artificial intelligence models may exhibit in the process of interacting with humans. This study first measured ChatGPT in 84 dimensions of psychological characteristics, revealing differences between ChatGPT and human norms in most dimensions as well as in high-dimensional psychological representations. Additionally, through the measurement of ChatGPT in 13 dimensions of cultural values, it was revealed that ChatGPT's cultural value patterns are dissimilar to those of various countries/regions worldwide. Finally, an analysis of ChatGPT's performance in eight decision-making tasks involving interactions with humans from different countries/regions revealed that ChatGPT exhibits clear cultural stereotypes in most decision-making tasks and shows significant cultural bias in third-party punishment and ultimatum games. The findings indicate that, compared to humans, ChatGPT exhibits a distinct psychological profile and cultural value orientation, and it also shows cultural biases and stereotypes in interpersonal decision-making. Future research endeavors should emphasize enhanced technical oversight and augmented transparency in the database and algorithmic training procedures to foster more efficient cross-cultural communication and mitigate social disparities.

Related papers

• Are Generative Language Models Multicultural? A Study on Hausa Culture and Emotions using ChatGPT [4.798444680860121]
  We compare responses generated by ChatGPT with those provided by native Hausa speakers on 37 culturally relevant questions. Our results show that ChatGPT has some level of similarity to human responses, but also exhibits some gaps and biases in its knowledge and awareness of the Hausa culture and emotions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T19:42:13Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models [53.626808086522985]
  We focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks. We evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts. We find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T14:03:27Z)
• CulturePark: Boosting Cross-cultural Understanding in Large Language Models [63.452948673344395]
  This paper introduces CulturePark, an LLM-powered multi-agent communication framework for cultural data collection. It generates high-quality cross-cultural dialogues encapsulating human beliefs, norms, and customs. We evaluate these models across three downstream tasks: content moderation, cultural alignment, and cultural education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T01:49:02Z)
• ChatHuman: Language-driven 3D Human Understanding with Retrieval-Augmented Tool Reasoning [57.29285473727107]
  ChatHuman is a language-driven human understanding system. It combines and integrates the skills of many different methods. ChatHuman is a step towards consolidating diverse methods for human analysis into a single, powerful, system for 3D human reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T17:59:31Z)
• A Linguistic Comparison between Human and ChatGPT-Generated Conversations [9.022590646680095]
  The research employs Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count analysis, comparing ChatGPT-generated conversations with human conversations. Results show greater variability and authenticity in human dialogues, but ChatGPT excels in categories such as social processes, analytical style, cognition, attentional focus, and positive emotional tone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T21:43:27Z)
• Human vs. LMMs: Exploring the Discrepancy in Emoji Interpretation and Usage in Digital Communication [68.40865217231695]
  This study examines the behavior of GPT-4V in replicating human-like use of emojis. The findings reveal a discernible discrepancy between human and GPT-4V behaviors, likely due to the subjective nature of human interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T08:56:52Z)
• Can ChatGPT Read Who You Are? [9.694940903078656]
  We report the results of a comprehensive user study featuring texts written in Czech by a representative population sample of 155 participants. We compare the personality trait estimations made by ChatGPT against those by human raters and report ChatGPT's competitive performance in inferring personality traits from text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T14:43:04Z)
• From Human-Centered to Social-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Assessing ChatGPT's Impact through Disruptive Events [0.0]
  The release of recent GPT models has been a watershed moment for artificial intelligence research and society at large. ChatGPT's impressive proficiency across technical and creative domains led to its widespread adoption. We argue that critiques of ChatGPT's impact have coalesced around its performance or other conventional Responsible AI evaluations relating to bias, toxicity, and 'hallucination'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T22:46:48Z)
• AI, write an essay for me: A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays [66.36541161082856]
  ChatGPT and similar generative AI models have attracted hundreds of millions of users. This study compares human-written versus ChatGPT-generated argumentative student essays.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T12:58:28Z)
• To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
  This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection. We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains. Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z)
• Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Study [9.919972416590124]
  ChatGPT has garnered widespread recognition for its exceptional ability to generate human-like responses in dialogue. We investigate the underlying cultural background of ChatGPT by analyzing its responses to questions designed to quantify human cultural differences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T15:43:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.