Many Hands Make Light Work: Task-Oriented Dialogue System with Module-Based Mixture-of-Experts
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09744v1
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 01:02:09 GMT
- Title: Many Hands Make Light Work: Task-Oriented Dialogue System with Module-Based Mixture-of-Experts
- Authors: Ruolin Su, Biing-Hwang Juang,
- Abstract summary: Task-oriented dialogue systems have greatly benefited from pre-trained language models (PLMs)
We propose Soft Mixture-of-Expert Task-Oriented Dialogue system (SMETOD)
SMETOD leverages an ensemble of Mixture-of-Experts (MoEs) to excel at subproblems and generate specialized outputs for task-oriented dialogues.
We extensively evaluate our model on three benchmark functionalities: intent prediction, dialogue state tracking, and dialogue response generation.
- Score: 9.129081545049992
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Task-oriented dialogue systems are broadly used in virtual assistants and other automated services, providing interfaces between users and machines to facilitate specific tasks. Nowadays, task-oriented dialogue systems have greatly benefited from pre-trained language models (PLMs). However, their task-solving performance is constrained by the inherent capacities of PLMs, and scaling these models is expensive and complex as the model size becomes larger. To address these challenges, we propose Soft Mixture-of-Expert Task-Oriented Dialogue system (SMETOD) which leverages an ensemble of Mixture-of-Experts (MoEs) to excel at subproblems and generate specialized outputs for task-oriented dialogues. SMETOD also scales up a task-oriented dialogue system with simplicity and flexibility while maintaining inference efficiency. We extensively evaluate our model on three benchmark functionalities: intent prediction, dialogue state tracking, and dialogue response generation. Experimental results demonstrate that SMETOD achieves state-of-the-art performance on most evaluated metrics. Moreover, comparisons against existing strong baselines show that SMETOD has a great advantage in the cost of inference and correctness in problem-solving.
Related papers
- Beyond Prompts: Dynamic Conversational Benchmarking of Large Language Models [0.0]
We introduce a dynamic benchmarking system for conversational agents that evaluates their performance through a single, simulated, and lengthy user interaction.
We context switch regularly to interleave the tasks, which constructs a realistic testing scenario in which we assess the Long-Term Memory, Continual Learning, and Information Integration capabilities of the agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-30T12:01:29Z) - Task-Oriented Dialogue with In-Context Learning [0.0]
We describe a system for building task-oriented dialogue systems combining the in-context learning abilities of large language models (LLMs) with the deterministic execution of business logic.
LLMs are used to translate between the surface form of the conversation and a domain-specific language which is used to progress the business logic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T15:43:35Z) - TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automation [82.2932794189585]
We introduce TaskBench, a framework to evaluate the capability of large language models (LLMs) in task automation.
Specifically, task decomposition, tool selection, and parameter prediction are assessed.
Our approach combines automated construction with rigorous human verification, ensuring high consistency with human evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-30T18:02:44Z) - Self-Explanation Prompting Improves Dialogue Understanding in Large
Language Models [52.24756457516834]
We propose a novel "Self-Explanation" prompting strategy to enhance the comprehension abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)
This task-agnostic approach requires the model to analyze each dialogue utterance before task execution, thereby improving performance across various dialogue-centric tasks.
Experimental results from six benchmark datasets confirm that our method consistently outperforms other zero-shot prompts and matches or exceeds the efficacy of few-shot prompts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-22T15:41:34Z) - Unlocking the Potential of User Feedback: Leveraging Large Language
Model as User Simulator to Enhance Dialogue System [65.93577256431125]
We propose an alternative approach called User-Guided Response Optimization (UGRO) to combine it with a smaller task-oriented dialogue model.
This approach uses LLM as annotation-free user simulator to assess dialogue responses, combining them with smaller fine-tuned end-to-end TOD models.
Our approach outperforms previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-16T13:04:56Z) - Leveraging Explicit Procedural Instructions for Data-Efficient Action
Prediction [5.448684866061922]
Task-oriented dialogues often require agents to enact complex, multi-step procedures in order to meet user requests.
Large language models have found success automating these dialogues in constrained environments, but their widespread deployment is limited by the substantial quantities of task-specific data required for training.
This paper presents a data-efficient solution to constructing dialogue systems, leveraging explicit instructions derived from agent guidelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-06T18:42:08Z) - Task-Optimized Adapters for an End-to-End Task-Oriented Dialogue System [0.0]
We propose an End-to-end TOD system with Task-d Adapters which learn independently per task, adding only small number of parameters after fixed layers of pre-trained network.
Our method is a model-agnostic approach and does not require prompt-tuning as only input data without a prompt.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-04T00:17:49Z) - CINS: Comprehensive Instruction for Few-shot Learning in Task-oriented
Dialog Systems [56.302581679816775]
This paper proposes Comprehensive Instruction (CINS) that exploits PLMs with task-specific instructions.
We design a schema (definition, constraint, prompt) of instructions and their customized realizations for three important downstream tasks in ToD.
Experiments are conducted on these ToD tasks in realistic few-shot learning scenarios with small validation data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-10T03:23:06Z) - RADDLE: An Evaluation Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Robust
Task-oriented Dialog Systems [75.87418236410296]
We introduce the RADDLE benchmark, a collection of corpora and tools for evaluating the performance of models across a diverse set of domains.
RADDLE is designed to favor and encourage models with a strong generalization ability.
We evaluate recent state-of-the-art systems based on pre-training and fine-tuning, and find that grounded pre-training on heterogeneous dialog corpora performs better than training a separate model per domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-29T08:58:49Z) - SOLOIST: Building Task Bots at Scale with Transfer Learning and Machine
Teaching [81.45928589522032]
We parameterize modular task-oriented dialog systems using a Transformer-based auto-regressive language model.
We pre-train, on heterogeneous dialog corpora, a task-grounded response generation model.
Experiments show that SOLOIST creates new state-of-the-art on well-studied task-oriented dialog benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-11T17:58:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.