Red Teaming Language Models for Processing Contradictory Dialogues

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10128v3
• Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 18:58:45 GMT
• Title: Red Teaming Language Models for Processing Contradictory Dialogues
• Authors: Xiaofei Wen, Bangzheng Li, Tenghao Huang, Muhao Chen,
• Abstract summary: Most language models currently available are prone to self-contradiction during dialogues. This study explores a novel contradictory dialogue processing task that aims to detect and modify contradictory statements in a conversation.
• Score: 30.522961490270532
• License:
• Abstract: Most language models currently available are prone to self-contradiction during dialogues. To mitigate this issue, this study explores a novel contradictory dialogue processing task that aims to detect and modify contradictory statements in a conversation. This task is inspired by research on context faithfulness and dialogue comprehension, which have demonstrated that the detection and understanding of contradictions often necessitate detailed explanations. We develop a dataset comprising contradictory dialogues, in which one side of the conversation contradicts itself. Each dialogue is accompanied by an explanatory label that highlights the location and details of the contradiction. With this dataset, we present a Red Teaming framework for contradictory dialogue processing. The framework detects and attempts to explain the dialogue, then modifies the existing contradictory content using the explanation. Our experiments demonstrate that the framework improves the ability to detect contradictory dialogues and provides valid explanations. Additionally, it showcases distinct capabilities for modifying such dialogues. Our study highlights the importance of the logical inconsistency problem in conversational AI.

Related papers

• Inconsistent dialogue responses and how to recover from them [45.933921383946576]
  One critical issue for chat systems is to stay consistent about preferences, opinions, beliefs and facts of itself. In this work, we study methods to assess and bolster utterance consistency of chat systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T19:46:04Z)
• Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension from a Topic-aware Perspective [70.37126956655985]
  This paper proposes to model multi-turn dialogues from a topic-aware perspective. We use a dialogue segmentation algorithm to split a dialogue passage into topic-concentrated fragments in an unsupervised way. We also present a novel model, Topic-Aware Dual-Attention Matching (TADAM) Network, which takes topic segments as processing elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T11:03:55Z)
• STRUDEL: Structured Dialogue Summarization for Dialogue Comprehension [42.57581945778631]
  Abstractive dialogue summarization has long been viewed as an important standalone task in natural language processing. We propose a novel type of dialogue summarization task - STRUctured DiaLoguE Summarization. We show that our STRUDEL dialogue comprehension model can significantly improve the dialogue comprehension performance of transformer encoder language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-24T04:39:54Z)
• Question-Interlocutor Scope Realized Graph Modeling over Key Utterances for Dialogue Reading Comprehension [61.55950233402972]
  We propose a new key utterances extracting method for dialogue reading comprehension. It performs prediction on the unit formed by several contiguous utterances, which can realize more answer-contained utterances. As a graph constructed on the text of utterances, we then propose Question-Interlocutor Scope Realized Graph (QuISG) modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T04:00:42Z)
• CDConv: A Benchmark for Contradiction Detection in Chinese Conversations [74.78715797366395]
  We propose a benchmark for Contradiction Detection in Chinese Conversations, namely CDConv. It contains 12K multi-turn conversations annotated with three typical contradiction categories: Intra-sentence Contradiction, Role Confusion, and History Contradiction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-16T11:37:09Z)
• Structural Modeling for Dialogue Disentanglement [43.352833140317486]
  Multi-party dialogue context Tangled multi-party dialogue context leads to challenges for dialogue reading comprehension. This work designs a novel model to disentangle multi-party history into threads, by taking dialogue structure features into account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T11:28:43Z)
• "How Robust r u?": Evaluating Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems on Spoken Conversations [87.95711406978157]
  This work presents a new benchmark on spoken task-oriented conversations. We study multi-domain dialogue state tracking and knowledge-grounded dialogue modeling. Our data set enables speech-based benchmarking of task-oriented dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T04:51:04Z)
• Advances in Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension: A Survey [51.215629336320305]
  We review the previous methods from the perspective of dialogue modeling. We discuss three typical patterns of dialogue modeling that are widely-used in dialogue comprehension tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-04T15:50:17Z)
• I like fish, especially dolphins: Addressing Contradictions in Dialogue Modeling [104.09033240889106]
  We introduce the DialoguE COntradiction DEtection task (DECODE) and a new conversational dataset containing both human-human and human-bot contradictory dialogues. We then compare a structured utterance-based approach of using pre-trained Transformer models for contradiction detection with the typical unstructured approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T18:47:49Z)
• Utterance-level Dialogue Understanding: An Empirical Study [43.35258958775454]
  This paper explores and quantify the role of context for different aspects of a dialogue. Specifically, we employ various perturbations to distort the context of a given utterance. This provides us with insights into the fundamental contextual controlling factors of different aspects of a dialogue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-29T09:50:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.