StyloAI: Distinguishing AI-Generated Content with Stylometric Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10129v1
• Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 14:28:01 GMT
• Title: StyloAI: Distinguishing AI-Generated Content with Stylometric Analysis
• Authors: Chidimma Opara,
• Abstract summary: This study proposes StyloAI, a data-driven model that uses 31 stylometric features to identify AI-generated texts. StyloAI achieves accuracy rates of 81% and 98% on the test set of the AuTextification dataset and the Education dataset, respectively.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The emergence of large language models (LLMs) capable of generating realistic texts and images has sparked ethical concerns across various sectors. In response, researchers in academia and industry are actively exploring methods to distinguish AI-generated content from human-authored material. However, a crucial question remains: What are the unique characteristics of AI-generated text? Addressing this gap, this study proposes StyloAI, a data-driven model that uses 31 stylometric features to identify AI-generated texts by applying a Random Forest classifier on two multi-domain datasets. StyloAI achieves accuracy rates of 81% and 98% on the test set of the AuTextification dataset and the Education dataset, respectively. This approach surpasses the performance of existing state-of-the-art models and provides valuable insights into the differences between AI-generated and human-authored texts.

Related papers

• Boosting Semi-Supervised Scene Text Recognition via Viewing and Summarizing [71.29488677105127]
  Existing scene text recognition (STR) methods struggle to recognize challenging texts, especially for artistic and severely distorted characters. We propose a contrastive learning-based STR framework by leveraging synthetic and real unlabeled data without any human cost. Our method achieves SOTA performance (94.7% and 70.9% average accuracy on common benchmarks and Union14M-Benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T15:24:47Z)
• Knowledge-Aware Reasoning over Multimodal Semi-structured Tables [85.24395216111462]
  This study investigates whether current AI models can perform knowledge-aware reasoning on multimodal structured data. We introduce MMTabQA, a new dataset designed for this purpose. Our experiments highlight substantial challenges for current AI models in effectively integrating and interpreting multiple text and image inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T15:17:43Z)
• Is Contrasting All You Need? Contrastive Learning for the Detection and Attribution of AI-generated Text [4.902089836908786]
  WhosAI is a triplet-network contrastive learning framework designed to predict whether a given input text has been generated by humans or AI. We show that our proposed framework achieves outstanding results in both the Turing Test and Authorship tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T15:44:56Z)
• Who Writes the Review, Human or AI? [0.36498648388765503]
  This study proposes a methodology to accurately distinguish AI-generated and human-written book reviews. Our approach utilizes transfer learning, enabling the model to identify generated text across different topics. The experimental results demonstrate that it is feasible to detect the original source of text, achieving an accuracy rate of 96.86%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T17:38:44Z)
• Evaluating the Efficacy of Hybrid Deep Learning Models in Distinguishing AI-Generated Text [0.0]
  My research investigates the use of cutting-edge hybrid deep learning models to accurately differentiate between AI-generated text and human writing. I applied a robust methodology, utilising a carefully selected dataset comprising AI and human texts from various sources, each tagged with instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T06:26:53Z)
• The Imitation Game: Detecting Human and AI-Generated Texts in the Era of ChatGPT and BARD [3.2228025627337864]
  We introduce a novel dataset of human-written and AI-generated texts in different genres. We employ several machine learning models to classify the texts. Results demonstrate the efficacy of these models in discerning between human and AI-generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-22T21:00:14Z)
• On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detection [76.55825911221434]
  We argue that as machine-generated text approximates human-like quality, the sample size needed for detection bounds increases. We test various state-of-the-art text generators, including GPT-2, GPT-3.5-Turbo, Llama, Llama-2-13B-Chat-HF, and Llama-2-70B-Chat-HF, against detectors, including oBERTa-Large/Base-Detector, GPTZero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T17:47:39Z)
• A Benchmark Corpus for the Detection of Automatically Generated Text in Academic Publications [0.02578242050187029]
  This paper presents two datasets comprised of artificially generated research content. In the first case, the content is completely generated by the GPT-2 model after a short prompt extracted from original papers. The partial or hybrid dataset is created by replacing several sentences of abstracts with sentences that are generated by the Arxiv-NLP model. We evaluate the quality of the datasets comparing the generated texts to aligned original texts using fluency metrics such as BLEU and ROUGE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-04T08:16:56Z)
• Artificial Text Detection via Examining the Topology of Attention Maps [58.46367297712477]
  We propose three novel types of interpretable topological features for this task based on Topological Data Analysis (TDA) We empirically show that the features derived from the BERT model outperform count- and neural-based baselines up to 10% on three common datasets. The probing analysis of the features reveals their sensitivity to the surface and syntactic properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T12:13:45Z)
• Pre-training Language Model Incorporating Domain-specific Heterogeneous Knowledge into A Unified Representation [49.89831914386982]
  We propose a unified pre-trained language model (PLM) for all forms of text, including unstructured text, semi-structured text, and well-structured text. Our approach outperforms the pre-training of plain text using only 1/4 of the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T16:05:24Z)
• Controllable Text Generation with Focused Variation [71.07811310799664]
  Focused-Variation Network (FVN) is a novel model to control language generation. FVN learns disjoint discrete latent spaces for each attribute inside codebooks, which allows for both controllability and diversity. We evaluate FVN on two text generation datasets with annotated content and style, and show state-of-the-art performance as assessed by automatic and human evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-25T06:31:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.