Language processing in humans and computers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14233v1
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 07:08:57 GMT
• Title: Language processing in humans and computers
• Authors: Dusko Pavlovic,
• Abstract summary: This note provides a high-level overview of language models and outlines a low-level model of learning machines. It turns out that, after they become capable of recognizing hallucinations and dreaming safely, the language-learning machines proceed to generate broader systems of false beliefs and self-confirming theories.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine-learned language models have transformed everyday life: they steer us when we study, drive, manage money. They have the potential to transform our civilization. But they hallucinate. Their realities are virtual. This note provides a high-level overview of language models and outlines a low-level model of learning machines. It turns out that, after they become capable of recognizing hallucinations and dreaming safely, as humans tend to be, the language-learning machines proceed to generate broader systems of false beliefs and self-confirming theories, as humans tend to do.

Related papers

• Passed the Turing Test: Living in Turing Futures [0.0]
  We are now living in one of many possible Turing futures where machines can pass for what they are not. However, the learning machines that Turing imagined would pass his imitation tests were machines inspired by the natural development of the low-energy human cortex.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T22:56:30Z)
• Unveiling the pressures underlying language learning and use in neural networks, large language models, and humans: Lessons from emergent machine-to-machine communication [5.371337604556311]
  We review three cases where mismatches between the emergent linguistic behavior of neural agents and humans were resolved. We identify key pressures at play for language learning and emergence: communicative success, production effort, learnability, and other psycho-/sociolinguistic factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T14:33:34Z)
• Large Language Models for Scientific Synthesis, Inference and Explanation [56.41963802804953]
  We show how large language models can perform scientific synthesis, inference, and explanation. We show that the large language model can augment this "knowledge" by synthesizing from the scientific literature. This approach has the further advantage that the large language model can explain the machine learning system's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T02:17:59Z)
• Learning to Model the World with Language [100.76069091703505]
  To interact with humans and act in the world, agents need to understand the range of language that people use and relate it to the visual world. Our key idea is that agents should interpret such diverse language as a signal that helps them predict the future. We instantiate this in Dynalang, an agent that learns a multimodal world model to predict future text and image representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T17:57:49Z)
• What Artificial Neural Networks Can Tell Us About Human Language Acquisition [47.761188531404066]
  Rapid progress in machine learning for natural language processing has the potential to transform debates about how humans learn language. To increase the relevance of learnability results from computational models, we need to train model learners without significant advantages over humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T00:12:37Z)
• Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances [119.29555551279155]
  Large language models can encode a wealth of semantic knowledge about the world. Such knowledge could be extremely useful to robots aiming to act upon high-level, temporally extended instructions expressed in natural language. We show how low-level skills can be combined with large language models so that the language model provides high-level knowledge about the procedures for performing complex and temporally-extended instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-04T17:57:11Z)
• Emergence of Machine Language: Towards Symbolic Intelligence with Neural Networks [73.94290462239061]
  We propose to combine symbolism and connectionism principles by using neural networks to derive a discrete representation. By designing an interactive environment and task, we demonstrated that machines could generate a spontaneous, flexible, and semantic language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T14:54:58Z)
• Language Models are not Models of Language [0.0]
  Transfer learning has enabled large deep learning neural networks trained on the language modeling task to vastly improve performance. We argue that the term language model is misleading because deep learning models are not theoretical models of language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-13T22:39:46Z)
• PIGLeT: Language Grounding Through Neuro-Symbolic Interaction in a 3D World [86.21137454228848]
  We factorize PIGLeT into a physical dynamics model, and a separate language model. PIGLeT can read a sentence, simulate neurally what might happen next, and then communicate that result through a literal symbolic representation. It is able to correctly forecast "what happens next" given an English sentence over 80% of the time, outperforming a 100x larger, text-to-text approach by over 10%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T02:32:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.