MoGU: A Framework for Enhancing Safety of Open-Sourced LLMs While Preserving Their Usability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14488v1
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 12:19:59 GMT
• Title: MoGU: A Framework for Enhancing Safety of Open-Sourced LLMs While Preserving Their Usability
• Authors: Yanrui Du, Sendong Zhao, Danyang Zhao, Ming Ma, Yuhan Chen, Liangyu Huo, Qing Yang, Dongliang Xu, Bing Qin,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in various applications. Our research finds that existing defense strategies lead LLMs to predominantly adopt a rejection-oriented stance. We introduce the MoGU framework, designed to enhance LLMs' safety while preserving their usability.
• Score: 25.750371424096436
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in various applications. As their usage grows, concerns regarding their safety are rising, especially in maintaining harmless responses when faced with malicious instructions. Many defense strategies have been developed to enhance the safety of LLMs. However, our research finds that existing defense strategies lead LLMs to predominantly adopt a rejection-oriented stance, thereby diminishing the usability of their responses to benign instructions. To solve this problem, we introduce the MoGU framework, designed to enhance LLMs' safety while preserving their usability. Our MoGU framework transforms the base LLM into two variants: the usable LLM and the safe LLM, and further employs dynamic routing to balance their contribution. When encountering malicious instructions, the router will assign a higher weight to the safe LLM to ensure that responses are harmless. Conversely, for benign instructions, the router prioritizes the usable LLM, facilitating usable and helpful responses. On various open-sourced LLMs, we compare multiple defense strategies to verify the superiority of our MoGU framework. Besides, our analysis provides key insights into the effectiveness of MoGU and verifies that our designed routing mechanism can effectively balance the contribution of each variant by assigning weights. Our work released the safer Llama2, Vicuna, Falcon, Dolphin, and Baichuan2.

Related papers

• Large Language Model Supply Chain: Open Problems From the Security Perspective [25.320736806895976]
  Large Language Model (LLM) is changing the software development paradigm and has gained huge attention from both academia and industry. We take the first step to discuss the potential security risks in each component as well as the integration between components of LLM SC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T15:20:21Z)
• Can a large language model be a gaslighter? [18.39951259823815]
  Large language models (LLMs) have gained human trust due to their capabilities and helpfulness. This in turn may allow LLMs to affect users' mindsets by manipulating language. In this work, we aim to investigate the vulnerability of LLMs under prompt-based and fine-tuning-based gaslighting attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T18:35:27Z)
• Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing [14.094372002702476]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted in a wide range of real-world applications. Recent studies have shown that LLMs are vulnerable to deliberately crafted adversarial prompts. We propose a novel defense method termed textbfLayer-specific textbfEditing (LED) to enhance the resilience of LLMs against jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T13:26:12Z)
• Cross-Task Defense: Instruction-Tuning LLMs for Content Safety [20.00136552026715]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) face challenges in balancing safety with utility. Despite defenses against malicious short questions, the ability of LLMs to safely handle dangerous long content, such as manuals teaching illicit activities, remains unclear. We introduce a defense dataset comprised of safety-related examples and propose single-task and mixed-task losses for instruction tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T04:14:32Z)
• ShieldLM: Empowering LLMs as Aligned, Customizable and Explainable Safety Detectors [90.73444232283371]
  ShieldLM is a safety detector for Large Language Models (LLMs) that aligns with common safety standards. We show that ShieldLM surpasses strong baselines across four test sets, showcasing remarkable customizability and explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T09:43:02Z)
• ROSE Doesn't Do That: Boosting the Safety of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Reverse Prompt Contrastive Decoding [89.0074567748505]
  We present reverse prompt contrastive decoding (ROSE), a simple-yet-effective method to boost the safety of existing instruction-tuned LLMs without any additional training. Experiments on 6 safety and 2 general-purpose tasks show that, our ROSE not only brings consistent and significant safety improvements (up to +13.8% safety score) upon 5 types of instruction-tuned LLMs, but also benefits the general-purpose ability of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T06:58:42Z)
• On Prompt-Driven Safeguarding for Large Language Models [172.13943777203377]
  We find that in the representation space, the input queries are typically moved by safety prompts in a "higher-refusal" direction. Inspired by these findings, we propose a method for safety prompt optimization, namely DRO. Treating a safety prompt as continuous, trainable embeddings, DRO learns to move the queries' representations along or opposite the refusal direction, depending on their harmfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T17:28:24Z)
• A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easily [51.63085197162279]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are designed to provide useful and safe responses. adversarial prompts known as 'jailbreaks' can circumvent safeguards. We propose ReNeLLM, an automatic framework that leverages LLMs themselves to generate effective jailbreak prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T16:02:16Z)
• MART: Improving LLM Safety with Multi-round Automatic Red-Teaming [72.2127916030909]
  We propose a Multi-round Automatic Red-Teaming (MART) method, which incorporates both automatic adversarial prompt writing and safe response generation. On adversarial prompt benchmarks, the violation rate of an LLM with limited safety alignment reduces up to 84.7% after 4 rounds of MART. Notably, model helpfulness on non-adversarial prompts remains stable throughout iterations, indicating the target LLM maintains strong performance on instruction following.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T19:13:29Z)
• Attack Prompt Generation for Red Teaming and Defending Large Language Models [70.157691818224]
  Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to red teaming attacks, which can induce LLMs to generate harmful content. We propose an integrated approach that combines manual and automatic methods to economically generate high-quality attack prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:15:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.