Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Demographic Inference with Large Multimodal Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15687v1
• Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 16:26:56 GMT
• Title: Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Demographic Inference with Large Multimodal Models
• Authors: Yongsheng Yu, Jiebo Luo,
• Abstract summary: Large multimodal models (LMMs) have shown transformative potential across various research tasks. Our findings indicate LMMs possess advantages in zero-shot learning, interpretability, and handling uncurated 'in-the-wild' inputs. We propose a Chain-of-Thought augmented prompting approach, which effectively mitigates the off-target prediction issue.
• Score: 58.58594658683919
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Conventional demographic inference methods have predominantly operated under the supervision of accurately labeled data, yet struggle to adapt to shifting social landscapes and diverse cultural contexts, leading to narrow specialization and limited accuracy in applications. Recently, the emergence of large multimodal models (LMMs) has shown transformative potential across various research tasks, such as visual comprehension and description. In this study, we explore the application of LMMs to demographic inference and introduce a benchmark for both quantitative and qualitative evaluation. Our findings indicate that LMMs possess advantages in zero-shot learning, interpretability, and handling uncurated 'in-the-wild' inputs, albeit with a propensity for off-target predictions. To enhance LMM performance and achieve comparability with supervised learning baselines, we propose a Chain-of-Thought augmented prompting approach, which effectively mitigates the off-target prediction issue.

Related papers

• Fair In-Context Learning via Latent Concept Variables [17.216196320585922]
  Large language models (LLMs) can inherit social bias and discrimination from their pre-training data. We design data augmentation strategies that reduce correlation between predictive outcomes and sensitive variables helping to promote fairness during latent concept learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T23:10:05Z)
• The Curse of Multi-Modalities: Evaluating Hallucinations of Large Multimodal Models across Language, Visual, and Audio [118.75449542080746]
  This paper presents the first systematic investigation of hallucinations in large multimodal models (LMMs) Our study reveals two key contributors to hallucinations: overreliance on unimodal priors and spurious inter-modality correlations. Our findings highlight key vulnerabilities, including imbalances in modality integration and biases from training data, underscoring the need for balanced cross-modal learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T17:59:02Z)
• MICM: Rethinking Unsupervised Pretraining for Enhanced Few-shot Learning [18.152453141040464]
  Unsupervised Few-Shot Learning seeks to bridge this divide by reducing reliance on annotated datasets during initial training phases. We first quantitatively assess the impacts of Masked Image Modeling (MIM) and Contrastive Learning (CL) on few-shot learning tasks. To address these trade-offs between generalization and discriminability in unsupervised pretraining, we introduce a novel paradigm named Masked Image Contrastive Modeling (MICM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T21:32:53Z)
• Adapting Large Multimodal Models to Distribution Shifts: The Role of In-Context Learning [41.59855801010565]
  Large multimodal models (LMMs) potentially act as general-purpose assistants and are highly robust against different distributions. Despite this, domain-specific adaptation is still necessary particularly in specialized areas like healthcare. This work investigates in-context learning (ICL) as an effective alternative for enhancing LMMs' adaptability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T17:59:21Z)
• Enhancing Fairness and Performance in Machine Learning Models: A Multi-Task Learning Approach with Monte-Carlo Dropout and Pareto Optimality [1.5498930424110338]
  This study introduces an approach to mitigate bias in machine learning by leveraging model uncertainty. Our approach utilizes a multi-task learning (MTL) framework combined with Monte Carlo (MC) Dropout to assess and mitigate uncertainty in predictions related to protected labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-12T04:17:50Z)
• Evaluating Interventional Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models [58.52919374786108]
  Large language models (LLMs) are used to automate decision-making tasks. In this paper, we evaluate whether LLMs can accurately update their knowledge of a data-generating process in response to an intervention. We create benchmarks that span diverse causal graphs (e.g., confounding, mediation) and variable types. These benchmarks allow us to isolate the ability of LLMs to accurately predict changes resulting from their ability to memorize facts or find other shortcuts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T14:15:56Z)
• Myriad: Large Multimodal Model by Applying Vision Experts for Industrial Anomaly Detection [86.24898024621008]
  We present a novel large multimodal model applying vision experts for industrial anomaly detection(abbreviated to Myriad) We utilize the anomaly map generated by the vision experts as guidance for LMMs, such that the vision model is guided to pay more attention to anomalous regions. Our proposed method not only performs favorably against state-of-the-art methods, but also inherits the flexibility and instruction-following ability of LMMs in the field of IAD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T16:49:45Z)
• Benchmarking Sequential Visual Input Reasoning and Prediction in Multimodal Large Language Models [21.438427686724932]
  We introduce a novel benchmark that assesses the predictive reasoning capabilities of MLLMs across diverse scenarios. Our benchmark targets three important domains: abstract pattern reasoning, human activity prediction, and physical interaction prediction. Empirical experiments confirm the soundness of the proposed benchmark and evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T13:14:38Z)
• Correlation Information Bottleneck: Towards Adapting Pretrained Multimodal Models for Robust Visual Question Answering [63.87200781247364]
  Correlation Information Bottleneck (CIB) seeks a tradeoff between compression and redundancy in representations. We derive a tight theoretical upper bound for the mutual information between multimodal inputs and representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-14T22:04:10Z)
• Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Training Deep Networks [83.44219640437657]
  Deep learning models are prone to learning spurious correlations that should not be learned as predictive clues. We propose a causality-based training framework to reduce the spurious correlations caused by observable confounders. We conduct experiments on two real-world tasks: Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Image Captioning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T17:47:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.