Recent Trends in Personalized Dialogue Generation: A Review of Datasets, Methodologies, and Evaluations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17974v1
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 09:04:13 GMT
- Title: Recent Trends in Personalized Dialogue Generation: A Review of Datasets, Methodologies, and Evaluations
- Authors: Yi-Pei Chen, Noriki Nishida, Hideki Nakayama, Yuji Matsumoto,
- Abstract summary: This paper seeks to survey the recent landscape of personalized dialogue generation.
Covering 22 datasets, we highlight benchmark datasets and newer ones enriched with additional features.
We analyze 17 seminal works from top conferences between 2021-2023 and identify five distinct types of problems.
- Score: 25.115319934091282
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Enhancing user engagement through personalization in conversational agents has gained significance, especially with the advent of large language models that generate fluent responses. Personalized dialogue generation, however, is multifaceted and varies in its definition -- ranging from instilling a persona in the agent to capturing users' explicit and implicit cues. This paper seeks to systemically survey the recent landscape of personalized dialogue generation, including the datasets employed, methodologies developed, and evaluation metrics applied. Covering 22 datasets, we highlight benchmark datasets and newer ones enriched with additional features. We further analyze 17 seminal works from top conferences between 2021-2023 and identify five distinct types of problems. We also shed light on recent progress by LLMs in personalized dialogue generation. Our evaluation section offers a comprehensive summary of assessment facets and metrics utilized in these works. In conclusion, we discuss prevailing challenges and envision prospect directions for future research in personalized dialogue generation.
Related papers
- "In Dialogues We Learn": Towards Personalized Dialogue Without Pre-defined Profiles through In-Dialogue Learning [37.307408706864514]
In-Dialogue Learning (IDL) is a fine-tuning framework that enhances the ability of pre-trained large language models to leverage dialogue history to characterize persona.
Our experiments on three datasets demonstrate that IDL brings substantial improvements, with BLEU and ROUGE scores increasing by up to 200% and 247%, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T16:43:03Z) - Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agents [95.84027826745609]
We introduce a machine-human pipeline to generate high-quality, very long-term dialogues.
We equip each agent with the capability of sharing and reacting to images.
The generated conversations are verified and edited by human annotators for long-range consistency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T18:42:31Z) - SPECTRUM: Speaker-Enhanced Pre-Training for Long Dialogue Summarization [48.284512017469524]
Multi-turn dialogues are characterized by their extended length and the presence of turn-taking conversations.
Traditional language models often overlook the distinct features of these dialogues by treating them as regular text.
We propose a speaker-enhanced pre-training method for long dialogue summarization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-31T04:50:00Z) - Dialogue Quality and Emotion Annotations for Customer Support
Conversations [7.218791626731783]
This paper presents a holistic annotation approach for emotion and conversational quality in the context of bilingual customer support conversations.
It provides a unique and valuable resource for the development of text classification models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-23T10:56:14Z) - Dialogue Agents 101: A Beginner's Guide to Critical Ingredients for Designing Effective Conversational Systems [29.394466123216258]
This study provides a comprehensive overview of the primary characteristics of a dialogue agent, their corresponding open-domain datasets, and the methods used to benchmark these datasets.
We propose UNIT, a UNified dIalogue dataseT constructed from conversations of existing datasets for different dialogue tasks capturing the nuances for each of them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-14T10:05:47Z) - Less is More: Learning to Refine Dialogue History for Personalized
Dialogue Generation [57.73547958927826]
We propose to refine the user dialogue history on a large scale, based on which we can handle more dialogue history and obtain more accurate persona information.
Specifically, we design an MSP model which consists of three personal information refiners and a personalized response generator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-18T02:02:56Z) - Cross-Lingual Dialogue Dataset Creation via Outline-Based Generation [70.81596088969378]
Cross-lingual Outline-based Dialogue dataset (termed COD) enables natural language understanding.
COD enables dialogue state tracking, and end-to-end dialogue modelling and evaluation in 4 diverse languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-31T18:11:21Z) - Commonsense-Focused Dialogues for Response Generation: An Empirical
Study [39.49727190159279]
We present an empirical study of commonsense in dialogue response generation.
We first auto-extract commonsensical dialogues from existing dialogue datasets by leveraging ConceptNet.
We then collect a new dialogue dataset with 25K dialogues aimed at exhibiting social commonsense in an interactive setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-14T04:32:09Z) - Dialogue History Matters! Personalized Response Selectionin Multi-turn
Retrieval-based Chatbots [62.295373408415365]
We propose a personalized hybrid matching network (PHMN) for context-response matching.
Our contributions are two-fold: 1) our model extracts personalized wording behaviors from user-specific dialogue history as extra matching information.
We evaluate our model on two large datasets with user identification, i.e., personalized dialogue Corpus Ubuntu (P- Ubuntu) and personalized Weibo dataset (P-Weibo)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-17T09:42:11Z) - Learning an Unreferenced Metric for Online Dialogue Evaluation [53.38078951628143]
We propose an unreferenced automated evaluation metric that uses large pre-trained language models to extract latent representations of utterances.
We show that our model achieves higher correlation with human annotations in an online setting, while not requiring true responses for comparison during inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-01T20:01:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.