Understanding Transformer Reasoning Capabilities via Graph Algorithms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18512v1
• Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 18:31:14 GMT
• Title: Understanding Transformer Reasoning Capabilities via Graph Algorithms
• Authors: Clayton Sanford, Bahare Fatemi, Ethan Hall, Anton Tsitsulin, Mehran Kazemi, Jonathan Halcrow, Bryan Perozzi, Vahab Mirrokni,
• Abstract summary: We study which transformer scaling regimes are able to perfectly solve different classes of algorithmic problems. Our results show that transformers excel at many graph reasoning tasks, even outperforming specialized graph neural networks.
• Score: 25.08208816144745
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Which transformer scaling regimes are able to perfectly solve different classes of algorithmic problems? While tremendous empirical advances have been attained by transformer-based neural networks, a theoretical understanding of their algorithmic reasoning capabilities in realistic parameter regimes is lacking. We investigate this question in terms of the network's depth, width, and number of extra tokens for algorithm execution. Our novel representational hierarchy separates 9 algorithmic reasoning problems into classes solvable by transformers in different realistic parameter scaling regimes. We prove that logarithmic depth is necessary and sufficient for tasks like graph connectivity, while single-layer transformers with small embedding dimensions can solve contextual retrieval tasks. We also support our theoretical analysis with ample empirical evidence using the GraphQA benchmark. These results show that transformers excel at many graph reasoning tasks, even outperforming specialized graph neural networks.

Related papers

• Graph Transformers Dream of Electric Flow [72.06286909236827]
  We show that the linear Transformer, when applied to graph data, can implement algorithms that solve canonical problems. We present explicit weight configurations for implementing each such graph algorithm, and we bound the errors of the constructed Transformers by the errors of the underlying algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T05:11:45Z)
• Pruning By Explaining Revisited: Optimizing Attribution Methods to Prune CNNs and Transformers [14.756988176469365]
  An effective approach to reduce computational requirements and increase efficiency is to prune unnecessary components of Deep Neural Networks. Previous work has shown that attribution methods from the field of eXplainable AI serve as effective means to extract and prune the least relevant network components in a few-shot fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T17:35:18Z)
• Simulation of Graph Algorithms with Looped Transformers [6.0465914748433915]
  We study the ability of transformer networks to simulate algorithms on graphs from a theoretical perspective. We prove by construction that this architecture can simulate individual algorithms such as Dijkstra's shortest path. We show a Turing Completeness result with constant width when the extra attention heads are utilized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T02:48:03Z)
• Deep Prompt Tuning for Graph Transformers [55.2480439325792]
  Fine-tuning is resource-intensive and requires storing multiple copies of large models. We propose a novel approach called deep graph prompt tuning as an alternative to fine-tuning. By freezing the pre-trained parameters and only updating the added tokens, our approach reduces the number of free parameters and eliminates the need for multiple model copies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T20:12:17Z)
• Unsupervised Learning of Invariance Transformations [105.54048699217668]
  We develop an algorithmic framework for finding approximate graph automorphisms. We discuss how this framework can be used to find approximate automorphisms in weighted graphs in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T17:03:28Z)
• Centered Self-Attention Layers [89.21791761168032]
  The self-attention mechanism in transformers and the message-passing mechanism in graph neural networks are repeatedly applied. We show that this application inevitably leads to oversmoothing, i.e., to similar representations at the deeper layers. We present a correction term to the aggregating operator of these mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T15:19:08Z)
• Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality [109.79516190693415]
  We investigate the limits of transformer large language models across three representative compositional tasks. These tasks require breaking problems down into sub-steps and synthesizing these steps into a precise answer. Our empirical findings suggest that transformer LLMs solve compositional tasks by reducing multi-step compositional reasoning into linearized subgraph matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T23:24:14Z)
• The Neural Data Router: Adaptive Control Flow in Transformers Improves Systematic Generalization [8.424405898986118]
  We propose two modifications to the Transformer architecture, copy gate and geometric attention. Our novel Neural Data Router (NDR) achieves 100% length generalization accuracy on the classic compositional table lookup task. NDR's attention and gating patterns tend to be interpretable as an intuitive form of neural routing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T21:24:27Z)
• Thinking Like Transformers [64.96770952820691]
  We propose a computational model for the transformer-encoder in the form of a programming language. We show how RASP can be used to program solutions to tasks that could conceivably be learned by a Transformer. We provide RASP programs for histograms, sorting, and Dyck-languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-13T13:04:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.