Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models at Scale with Counterfactuals

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20152v1
• Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 15:27:56 GMT
• Title: Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models at Scale with Counterfactuals
• Authors: Phillip Howard, Kathleen C. Fraser, Anahita Bhiwandiwalla, Svetlana Kiritchenko,
• Abstract summary: We study the social biases contained in text generated by Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) We present LVLMs with identical open-ended text prompts while conditioning on images from different counterfactual sets. We evaluate the text produced by different models under this counterfactual generation setting at scale, producing over 57 million responses from popular LVLMs.
• Score: 8.41410889524315
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) possessing increasingly impressive capabilities, a number of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have been proposed to augment LLMs with visual inputs. Such models condition generated text on both an input image and a text prompt, enabling a variety of use cases such as visual question answering and multimodal chat. While prior studies have examined the social biases contained in text generated by LLMs, this topic has been relatively unexplored in LVLMs. Examining social biases in LVLMs is particularly challenging due to the confounding contributions of bias induced by information contained across the text and visual modalities. To address this challenging problem, we conduct a large-scale study of text generated by different LVLMs under counterfactual changes to input images. Specifically, we present LVLMs with identical open-ended text prompts while conditioning on images from different counterfactual sets, where each set contains images which are largely identical in their depiction of a common subject (e.g., a doctor), but vary only in terms of intersectional social attributes (e.g., race and gender). We comprehensively evaluate the text produced by different models under this counterfactual generation setting at scale, producing over 57 million responses from popular LVLMs. Our multi-dimensional analysis reveals that social attributes such as race, gender, and physical characteristics depicted in input images can significantly influence the generation of toxic content, competency-associated words, harmful stereotypes, and numerical ratings of depicted individuals. We additionally explore the relationship between social bias in LVLMs and their corresponding LLMs, as well as inference-time strategies to mitigate bias.

Related papers

• A Thousand Words or An Image: Studying the Influence of Persona Modality in Multimodal LLMs [21.08821957575833]
  We create a novel dataset of 40 diverse personas varying in age, gender, occupation, and location. This consists of four modalities to equivalently represent a persona: image-only, text-only, a combination of image and small text, and typographical images. Comprehensive experiments show that personas represented by detailed text show more linguistic habits, while typographical images often show more consistency with the persona.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T20:25:00Z)
• VilBias: A Study of Bias Detection through Linguistic and Visual Cues , presenting Annotation Strategies, Evaluation, and Key Challenges [2.2751168722976587]
  VLBias is a framework that leverages state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to detect linguistic and visual biases in news content. We present a multimodal dataset comprising textual content and corresponding images from diverse news sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-22T15:05:30Z)
• Looking Beyond Text: Reducing Language bias in Large Vision-Language Models via Multimodal Dual-Attention and Soft-Image Guidance [67.26434607115392]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have achieved impressive results in various vision-language tasks. LVLMs suffer from hallucinations caused by language bias, leading to diminished focus on images and ineffective visual comprehension. We propose LACING to address the language bias of LVLMs with muLtimodal duAl-attention meChanIsm (MDA) aNd soft-image Guidance (IFG)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T16:33:30Z)
• Large Language Models Reflect the Ideology of their Creators [73.25935570218375]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on vast amounts of data to generate natural language. We uncover notable diversity in the ideological stance exhibited across different LLMs and languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T04:02:30Z)
• Spoken Stereoset: On Evaluating Social Bias Toward Speaker in Speech Large Language Models [50.40276881893513]
  This study introduces Spoken Stereoset, a dataset specifically designed to evaluate social biases in Speech Large Language Models (SLLMs) By examining how different models respond to speech from diverse demographic groups, we aim to identify these biases. The findings indicate that while most models show minimal bias, some still exhibit slightly stereotypical or anti-stereotypical tendencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T16:55:06Z)
• Paying More Attention to Image: A Training-Free Method for Alleviating Hallucination in LVLMs [14.381188702947949]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) primarily align image features of vision encoder with Large Language Models (LLMs) to leverage their superior text generation capabilities. This imbalance in LVLMs may result in the instances of hallucinatory. We introduce a training-free algorithm to find an equilibrium point between image comprehension and language inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T17:46:57Z)
• Rethinking Visual Prompting for Multimodal Large Language Models with External Knowledge [76.45868419402265]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant strides by training on vast high-quality image-text datasets. However, the inherent difficulty in explicitly conveying fine-grained or spatially dense information in text, such as masks, poses a challenge for MLLMs. This paper proposes a new visual prompt approach to integrate fine-grained external knowledge, gleaned from specialized vision models, into MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T17:43:30Z)
• Social Bias Evaluation for Large Language Models Requires Prompt Variations [38.91306092184724]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit considerable social biases. This paper investigates the sensitivity of LLMs when changing prompt variations. We show that LLMs have tradeoffs between performance and social bias caused by the prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T14:12:04Z)
• Visualization Literacy of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comparative Study [12.367399155606162]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) combine the inherent power of large language models (LLMs) with the renewed capabilities to reason about the multimodal context. Many recent works in visualization have demonstrated MLLMs' capability to understand and interpret visualization results and explain the content of the visualization to users in natural language. In this work, we aim to fill the gap by utilizing the concept of visualization literacy to evaluate MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T17:52:16Z)
• Is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words? Delving Into Spatial Reasoning for Vision Language Models [37.44286562901589]
  We propose SpatialEval, a novel benchmark that covers diverse aspects of spatial reasoning. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of competitive language and vision-language models. Our findings reveal several counter-intuitive insights that have been overlooked in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T03:53:37Z)
• Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models with Counterfactuals [8.414108895243148]
  We study the social biases contained in text generated by Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) We present LVLMs with identical open-ended text prompts while conditioning on images from different counterfactual sets. We find that social attributes such as race, gender, and physical characteristics depicted in input images can significantly influence toxicity and the generation of competency-associated words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T21:45:53Z)
• Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models [61.6896704217147]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have become indispensable tools in computer vision and natural language processing. Our investigation reveals a noteworthy bias in the generated content, where the output is primarily influenced by the underlying Large Language Models (LLMs) prior to the input image. To rectify these biases and redirect the model's focus toward vision information, we introduce two simple, training-free strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T12:35:07Z)
• A Unified Framework and Dataset for Assessing Societal Bias in Vision-Language Models [9.025958469582363]
  We propose a unified framework for evaluating gender, race, and age biases in vision-language models (VLMs) We generate high-quality synthetic datasets that intentionally conceal gender, race, and age information across different professional domains. The dataset includes action-based descriptions of each profession and serves as a benchmark for evaluating societal biases in vision-language models (VLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T09:17:51Z)
• InternLM-XComposer2: Mastering Free-form Text-Image Composition and Comprehension in Vision-Language Large Model [108.42241250772643]
  We introduce InternLM-XComposer2, a vision-language model excelling in free-form text-image composition and comprehension. This model goes beyond conventional vision-language understanding, adeptly crafting interleaved text-image content from diverse inputs. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of InternLM-XComposer2 based on InternLM2-7B in producing high-quality long-text multi-modal content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T18:59:02Z)
• Incorporating Visual Experts to Resolve the Information Loss in Multimodal Large Language Models [121.83413400686139]
  This paper proposes to improve the visual perception ability of MLLMs through a mixture-of-experts knowledge enhancement mechanism. We introduce a novel method that incorporates multi-task encoders and visual tools into the existing MLLMs training and inference pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-06T02:02:34Z)
• Behind the Magic, MERLIM: Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark for Large Image-Language Models [50.653838482083614]
  This paper introduces a scalable test-bed to assess the capabilities of IT-LVLMs on fundamental computer vision tasks. MERLIM contains over 300K image-question pairs and has a strong focus on detecting cross-modal "hallucination" events in IT-LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T16:39:36Z)
• Mitigating Hallucination in Visual Language Models with Visual Supervision [33.05550629039951]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) suffer from hallucination a lot. Key problem lies in its weak ability to comprehend detailed content in a multi-modal context. In this paper, we bring more detailed vision annotations and more discriminative vision models to facilitate the training of LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T09:30:02Z)
• Visually-Augmented Language Modeling [137.36789885105642]
  We propose a novel pre-training framework, named VaLM, to Visually-augment text tokens with retrieved relevant images for Language Modeling. With the visually-augmented context, VaLM uses a visual knowledge fusion layer to enable multimodal grounded language modeling. We evaluate the proposed model on various multimodal commonsense reasoning tasks, which require visual information to excel.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T13:41:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.