Benchmarking for Deep Uplift Modeling in Online Marketing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.00335v1
• Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 07:23:37 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking for Deep Uplift Modeling in Online Marketing
• Authors: Dugang Liu, Xing Tang, Yang Qiao, Miao Liu, Zexu Sun, Xiuqiang He, Zhong Ming,
• Abstract summary: Deep uplift modeling (DUM) as a promising technique has attracted increased research from academia and industry. Current DUM still lacks some standardized benchmarks and unified evaluation protocols. We provide an open benchmark for DUM and present comparison results of existing models in a reproducible and uniform manner.
• Score: 17.70084353772874
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Online marketing is critical for many industrial platforms and business applications, aiming to increase user engagement and platform revenue by identifying corresponding delivery-sensitive groups for specific incentives, such as coupons and bonuses. As the scale and complexity of features in industrial scenarios increase, deep uplift modeling (DUM) as a promising technique has attracted increased research from academia and industry, resulting in various predictive models. However, current DUM still lacks some standardized benchmarks and unified evaluation protocols, which limit the reproducibility of experimental results in existing studies and the practical value and potential impact in this direction. In this paper, we provide an open benchmark for DUM and present comparison results of existing models in a reproducible and uniform manner. To this end, we conduct extensive experiments on two representative industrial datasets with different preprocessing settings to re-evaluate 13 existing models. Surprisingly, our experimental results show that the most recent work differs less than expected from traditional work in many cases. In addition, our experiments also reveal the limitations of DUM in generalization, especially for different preprocessing and test distributions. Our benchmarking work allows researchers to evaluate the performance of new models quickly but also reasonably demonstrates fair comparison results with existing models. It also gives practitioners valuable insights into often overlooked considerations when deploying DUM. We will make this benchmarking library, evaluation protocol, and experimental setup available on GitHub.

Related papers

• OLMES: A Standard for Language Model Evaluations [64.85905119836818]
  We propose OLMES, a practical, open standard for reproducible language model evaluations. We identify and review the varying factors in evaluation practices adopted by the community. OLMES supports meaningful comparisons between smaller base models that require the unnatural "cloze" formulation of multiple-choice questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T17:37:09Z)
• Diversified Batch Selection for Training Acceleration [68.67164304377732]
  A prevalent research line, known as online batch selection, explores selecting informative subsets during the training process. vanilla reference-model-free methods involve independently scoring and selecting data in a sample-wise manner. We propose Diversified Batch Selection (DivBS), which is reference-model-free and can efficiently select diverse and representative samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T12:12:20Z)
• Predictive Churn with the Set of Good Models [64.05949860750235]
  We study the effect of conflicting predictions over the set of near-optimal machine learning models. We present theoretical results on the expected churn between models within the Rashomon set. We show how our approach can be used to better anticipate, reduce, and avoid churn in consumer-facing applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:15:25Z)
• Robust Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models for Domain Generalization [6.7181844004432385]
  Foundation models have impressive zero-shot inference capabilities and robustness under distribution shifts. We present a new recipe for few-shot fine-tuning of the popular vision-language foundation model CLIP. Our experimentation demonstrates that, while zero-shot CLIP fails to match performance of trained vision models on more complex benchmarks, few-shot CLIP fine-tuning outperforms its vision-only counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T20:50:40Z)
• Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheater [142.24553056600627]
  Large language models(LLMs) have greatly advanced the frontiers of artificial intelligence, attaining remarkable improvement in model capacity. To assess the model performance, a typical approach is to construct evaluation benchmarks for measuring the ability level of LLMs. We discuss the potential risk and impact of inappropriately using evaluation benchmarks and misleadingly interpreting the evaluation results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T14:59:54Z)
• Operationalizing Specifications, In Addition to Test Sets for Evaluating Constrained Generative Models [17.914521288548844]
  We argue that the scale of generative models could be exploited to raise the abstraction level at which evaluation itself is conducted. Our recommendations are based on leveraging specifications as a powerful instrument to evaluate generation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T06:39:43Z)
• Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization benchmarks [67.29240500171532]
  Benchopt is a framework to automate, reproduce and publish optimization benchmarks in machine learning. Benchopt simplifies benchmarking for the community by providing an off-the-shelf tool for running, sharing and extending experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-27T16:19:24Z)
• Models, Pixels, and Rewards: Evaluating Design Trade-offs in Visual Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [109.74041512359476]
  We study a number of design decisions for the predictive model in visual MBRL algorithms. We find that a range of design decisions that are often considered crucial, such as the use of latent spaces, have little effect on task performance. We show how this phenomenon is related to exploration and how some of the lower-scoring models on standard benchmarks will perform the same as the best-performing models when trained on the same training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T18:03:21Z)
• BARS-CTR: Open Benchmarking for Click-Through Rate Prediction [30.000261789268063]
  Click-through rate (CTR) prediction is a critical task for many applications. In recent years, CTR prediction has been widely studied in both academia and industry. There is still a lack of standardized benchmarks and uniform evaluation protocols for CTR prediction research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-12T13:34:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.