Editing the Mind of Giants: An In-Depth Exploration of Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01436v1
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 15:28:21 GMT
- Title: Editing the Mind of Giants: An In-Depth Exploration of Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models
- Authors: Cheng-Hsun Hsueh, Paul Kuo-Ming Huang, Tzu-Han Lin, Che-Wei Liao, Hung-Chieh Fang, Chao-Wei Huang, Yun-Nung Chen,
- Abstract summary: Recent studies have identified concerning side effects, such as knowledge distortion and the deterioration of general abilities, that have emerged after editing.
This survey presents a comprehensive study of these side effects, providing a unified view of the challenges associated with knowledge editing in Large Language Models.
- Score: 26.516571783335824
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Knowledge editing is a rising technique for efficiently updating factual knowledge in Large Language Models (LLMs) with minimal alteration of parameters. However, recent studies have identified concerning side effects, such as knowledge distortion and the deterioration of general abilities, that have emerged after editing. This survey presents a comprehensive study of these side effects, providing a unified view of the challenges associated with knowledge editing in LLMs. We discuss related works and summarize potential research directions to overcome these limitations. Our work highlights the limitations of current knowledge editing methods, emphasizing the need for deeper understanding of inner knowledge structures of LLMs and improved knowledge editing methods. To foster future research, we have released the complementary materials such as paper collection publicly at https://github.com/MiuLab/EditLLM-Survey
Related papers
- How Well Can Knowledge Edit Methods Edit Perplexing Knowledge? [18.022428746019582]
This study investigates the capability of knowledge editing methods to incorporate new knowledge with varying degrees of "perplexingness"
We find significant negative correlations between the "perplexingness" of the new knowledge and the edit efficacy across all 12 scenarios.
Further exploration into the influence of knowledge hierarchy on editing outcomes indicates that knowledge positioned at higher hierarchical levels is more challenging to modify in some scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T03:41:02Z) - Editing Conceptual Knowledge for Large Language Models [67.8410749469755]
This paper pioneers the investigation of editing conceptual knowledge for Large Language Models (LLMs)
We construct a novel benchmark dataset ConceptEdit and establish a suite of new metrics for evaluation.
experimental results reveal that, although existing editing methods can efficiently modify concept-level definition to some extent, they also have the potential to distort the related instantial knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-10T16:57:10Z) - Editing Factual Knowledge and Explanatory Ability of Medical Large Language Models [89.13883089162951]
Model editing aims to precisely alter the behaviors of large language models (LLMs) in relation to specific knowledge.
This approach has proven effective in addressing issues of hallucination and outdated information in LLMs.
However, the potential of using model editing to modify knowledge in the medical field remains largely unexplored.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T06:40:57Z) - Knowledge Graph Enhanced Large Language Model Editing [37.6721061644483]
Large language models (LLMs) are pivotal in advancing natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
Existing editing methods struggle to track and incorporate changes in knowledge associated with edits.
We propose a novel model editing method that leverages knowledge graphs for enhancing LLM editing, namely GLAME.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T07:52:26Z) - Learning to Edit: Aligning LLMs with Knowledge Editing [101.96620267293731]
We propose a Learning to Edit (LTE) framework, focusing on teaching large language models to apply updated knowledge into input questions.
LTE features a two-phase process: (i) the Alignment Phase, which fine-tunes LLMs on a meticulously curated parallel dataset to make reliable, in-scope edits.
We demonstrate LTE's superiority in knowledge editing performance, robustness in both batch and sequential editing, minimal interference on general tasks, and rapid editing speeds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T07:45:17Z) - Model Editing Harms General Abilities of Large Language Models: Regularization to the Rescue [122.20016030723043]
Model editing is a technique that edits large language models (LLMs) with updated knowledge to alleviate hallucinations without resource-intensive retraining.
Current model editing methods can effectively modify a model's behavior within a specific area of interest.
They often overlook the potential unintended side effects on the general abilities of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-09T18:03:15Z) - A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models [82.65729336401027]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown extraordinary capabilities in understanding and generating text that closely mirrors human communication.
This paper defines the knowledge editing problem and provides a comprehensive review of cutting-edge approaches.
We introduce a new benchmark, KnowEdit, for a comprehensive empirical evaluation of representative knowledge editing approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-02T16:54:58Z) - Unveiling the Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models [41.83423510576848]
It is still unclear whether knowledge editing might introduce side effects that pose potential risks or not.
This paper pioneers the investigation into the potential pitfalls associated with knowledge editing for Large Language Models.
Experimental results vividly demonstrate that knowledge editing might inadvertently cast a shadow of unintended consequences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T15:10:46Z) - Eva-KELLM: A New Benchmark for Evaluating Knowledge Editing of LLMs [54.22416829200613]
Eva-KELLM is a new benchmark for evaluating knowledge editing of large language models.
Experimental results indicate that the current methods for knowledge editing using raw documents are not effective in yielding satisfactory results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-19T09:17:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.