Log Parsing with Self-Generated In-Context Learning and Self-Correction
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03376v1
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 15:31:43 GMT
- Title: Log Parsing with Self-Generated In-Context Learning and Self-Correction
- Authors: Yifan Wu, Siyu Yu, Ying Li,
- Abstract summary: Despite a variety of log parsing methods that have been proposed, their performance on evolving log data remains unsatisfactory due to reliance on human-crafted rules or learning-based models with limited training data.
We propose Ada, an effective and adaptive log parsing framework using LLMs with self-generated in-context learning (SG-ICL) and self-correction.
- Score: 15.93927602769091
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Log parsing transforms log messages into structured formats, serving as a crucial step for log analysis. Despite a variety of log parsing methods that have been proposed, their performance on evolving log data remains unsatisfactory due to reliance on human-crafted rules or learning-based models with limited training data. The recent emergence of large language models (LLMs) has demonstrated strong abilities in understanding natural language and code, making it promising to apply LLMs for log parsing. Consequently, several studies have proposed LLM-based log parsers. However, LLMs may produce inaccurate templates, and existing LLM-based log parsers directly use the template generated by the LLM as the parsing result, hindering the accuracy of log parsing. Furthermore, these log parsers depend heavily on historical log data as demonstrations, which poses challenges in maintaining accuracy when dealing with scarce historical log data or evolving log data. To address these challenges, we propose AdaParser, an effective and adaptive log parsing framework using LLMs with self-generated in-context learning (SG-ICL) and self-correction. To facilitate accurate log parsing, AdaParser incorporates a novel component, a template corrector, which utilizes the LLM to correct potential parsing errors in the templates it generates. In addition, AdaParser maintains a dynamic candidate set composed of previously generated templates as demonstrations to adapt evolving log data. Extensive experiments on public large-scale datasets show that AdaParser outperforms state-of-the-art methods across all metrics, even in zero-shot scenarios. Moreover, when integrated with different LLMs, AdaParser consistently enhances the performance of the utilized LLMs by a large margin.
Related papers
- Studying and Benchmarking Large Language Models For Log Level Suggestion [49.176736212364496]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a focal point of research across various domains.
This paper investigates the impact of characteristics and learning paradigms on the performance of 12 open-source LLMs in log level suggestion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T03:52:17Z) - LogParser-LLM: Advancing Efficient Log Parsing with Large Language Models [19.657278472819588]
We introduce Log-LLM, a novel log integrated with LLM capabilities.
We address the intricate challenge of parsing granularity, proposing a new metric to allow users to calibrate granularity to their specific needs.
Our method's efficacy is empirically demonstrated through evaluations on the Loghub-2k and the large-scale LogPub benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-25T05:34:24Z) - LibreLog: Accurate and Efficient Unsupervised Log Parsing Using Open-Source Large Language Models [3.7960472831772774]
This paper introduces LibreLog, an unsupervised log parsing approach that enhances privacy and reduces operational costs while achieving state-of-the-art parsing accuracy.
Our evaluation on LogHub-2.0 shows that LibreLog achieves 25% higher parsing accuracy and processes 2.7 times faster compared to state-of-the-art LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T21:54:13Z) - SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts.
We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM.
We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z) - DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning Graph [70.79413606968814]
We introduce Dynamic Evaluation of LLMs via Adaptive Reasoning Graph Evolvement (DARG) to dynamically extend current benchmarks with controlled complexity and diversity.
Specifically, we first extract the reasoning graphs of data points in current benchmarks and then perturb the reasoning graphs to generate novel testing data.
Such newly generated test samples can have different levels of complexity while maintaining linguistic diversity similar to the original benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T04:27:53Z) - LUNAR: Unsupervised LLM-based Log Parsing [34.344687402936835]
We propose LUNAR, an unsupervised-based method for efficient and off-the-shelf log parsing.
Our key insight is that while LLMs may struggle with direct log parsing, their performance can be significantly enhanced through comparative analysis.
Experiments on large-scale public datasets demonstrate that LUNAR significantly outperforms state-of-the-art log crafts in terms of accuracy and efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T11:32:01Z) - LLMParser: An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Log Parsing [8.647406441990396]
We study the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) for log parsing and propose an LLM-based log based on generative inferences and few-shot tuning.
We find that smaller LLMs may be more effective than more complex LLMs; for instance where Flan-T5-base achieves comparable results as LLaMA-7B with a shorter time.
We also find that using LLMs pre-trained using logs from other systems does not always improve parsing accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-27T20:34:29Z) - CodecLM: Aligning Language Models with Tailored Synthetic Data [51.59223474427153]
We introduce CodecLM, a framework for adaptively generating high-quality synthetic data for instruction-following abilities.
We first encode seed instructions into metadata, which are concise keywords generated on-the-fly to capture the target instruction distribution.
We also introduce Self-Rubrics and Contrastive Filtering during decoding to tailor data-efficient samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-08T21:15:36Z) - Speech Translation with Large Language Models: An Industrial Practice [64.5419534101104]
We introduce LLM-ST, a novel and effective speech translation model constructed upon a pre-trained large language model (LLM)
By integrating the large language model (LLM) with a speech encoder and employing multi-task instruction tuning, LLM-ST can produce accurate timestamped transcriptions and translations.
Through rigorous experimentation on English and Chinese datasets, we showcase the exceptional performance of LLM-ST.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-21T05:32:49Z) - LILAC: Log Parsing using LLMs with Adaptive Parsing Cache [38.04960745458878]
We propose LILAC, the first practical log parsing framework using large language models (LLMs) with adaptive parsing cache.
LLMs's lack of specialized log parsing capabilities currently hinders their accuracy in parsing.
We show LILAC outperforms state-of-the-art methods by 69.5% in terms of the average F1 score of template accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T04:46:59Z) - Self-Supervised Log Parsing [59.04636530383049]
Large-scale software systems generate massive volumes of semi-structured log records.
Existing approaches rely on log-specifics or manual rule extraction.
We propose NuLog that utilizes a self-supervised learning model and formulates the parsing task as masked language modeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-17T19:25:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.