Zero, Finite, and Infinite Belief History of Theory of Mind Reasoning in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04800v1
• Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 10:04:39 GMT
• Title: Zero, Finite, and Infinite Belief History of Theory of Mind Reasoning in Large Language Models
• Authors: Weizhi Tang, Vaishak Belle,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown a promise and emergence of Theory of Mind (ToM) ability. We propose a novel concept, taxonomy, and framework, the ToM reasoning with Zero, Finite, and Infinite Belief History. We have evaluated six LLMs with this game and found their performance on Zero Belief History is consistently better than on Finite Belief History.
• Score: 5.455744338342196
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown a promise and emergence of Theory of Mind (ToM) ability and even outperform humans in certain ToM tasks. To evaluate and extend the boundaries of the ToM reasoning ability of LLMs, we propose a novel concept, taxonomy, and framework, the ToM reasoning with Zero, Finite, and Infinite Belief History and develop a multi-round text-based game, called $\textit{Pick the Right Stuff}$, as a benchmark. We have evaluated six LLMs with this game and found their performance on Zero Belief History is consistently better than on Finite Belief History. In addition, we have found two of the models with small parameter sizes outperform all the evaluated models with large parameter sizes. We expect this work to pave the way for future ToM benchmark development and also for the promotion and development of more complex AI agents or systems which are required to be equipped with more complex ToM reasoning ability.

Related papers

• Perceptions to Beliefs: Exploring Precursory Inferences for Theory of Mind in Large Language Models [51.91448005607405]
  We evaluate key human ToM precursors by annotating characters' perceptions on ToMi and FANToM. We present PercepToM, a novel ToM method leveraging LLMs' strong perception inference capability while supplementing their limited perception-to-belief inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T14:58:29Z)
• ToM-LM: Delegating Theory of Mind Reasoning to External Symbolic Executors in Large Language Models [5.455744338342196]
  Theory of Mind (ToM) refers to the ability of individuals to attribute mental states to others. Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown some promise with ToM ability, but they still struggle with complex ToM reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T20:59:03Z)
• NegotiationToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind on Negotiation Surrounding [55.38254464415964]
  Theory of mind evaluations currently focuses on testing models using machine-generated data or game settings prone to shortcuts and spurious correlations. We introduce NegotiationToM, a new benchmark designed to stress-test machine ToM in real-world negotiation surrounding covered multi-dimensional mental states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-21T11:51:13Z)
• MMToM-QA: Multimodal Theory of Mind Question Answering [80.87550820953236]
  Theory of Mind (ToM) is an essential ingredient for developing machines with human-level social intelligence. Recent machine learning models, particularly large language models, seem to show some aspects of ToM understanding. Human ToM, on the other hand, is more than video or text understanding. People can flexibly reason about another person's mind based on conceptual representations extracted from any available data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T18:59:24Z)
• Think Twice: Perspective-Taking Improves Large Language Models' Theory-of-Mind Capabilities [63.90227161974381]
  SimToM is a novel prompting framework inspired by Simulation Theory's notion of perspective-taking. Our approach, which requires no additional training and minimal prompt-tuning, shows substantial improvement over existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T22:49:27Z)
• Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Examining Performance of 11 State-of-the-Art models vs. Children Aged 7-10 on Advanced Tests [1.099532646524593]
  We test 11 base- and instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) on capabilities relevant to Theory of Mind (ToM) We find that instruction-tuned LLMs from the GPT family outperform other models, and often also children. We suggest that the interlinked evolution and development of language and ToM may help explain what instruction-tuning adds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T09:55:07Z)
• Towards A Holistic Landscape of Situated Theory of Mind in Large Language Models [14.491223187047378]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have generated considerable interest and debate regarding their potential emergence of Theory of Mind (ToM) Several recent inquiries reveal a lack of robust ToM in these models and pose a pressing demand to develop new benchmarks. We taxonomize machine ToM into 7 mental state categories and delineate existing benchmarks to identify under-explored aspects of ToM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T15:12:09Z)
• HI-TOM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Higher-Order Theory of Mind Reasoning in Large Language Models [31.831042765744204]
  Theory of Mind (ToM) is the ability to reason about one's own and others' mental states. We introduce HI-TOM, a Higher Order Theory of Mind benchmark. Our experimental evaluation using various Large Language Models (LLMs) indicates a decline in performance on higher-order ToM tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T16:41:15Z)
• FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in Interactions [94.61530480991627]
  Theory of mind evaluations currently focus on testing models using passive narratives that inherently lack interactivity. We introduce FANToM, a new benchmark designed to stress-test ToM within information-asymmetric conversational contexts via question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T00:24:11Z)
• Reason for Future, Act for Now: A Principled Framework for Autonomous LLM Agents with Provable Sample Efficiency [53.8779374188643]
  We propose a principled framework with provable regret guarantees to orchestrate reasoning and acting. Specifically, we design a prompt template for reasoning that learns from the memory buffer and plans a future trajectory over a long horizon. At each step, the LLM agent takes the initial action of the planned trajectory ("act for now"), stores the collected feedback in the memory buffer, and reinvokes the reasoning routine to replan the future trajectory from the new state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T16:36:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.