Deconstructing The Ethics of Large Language Models from Long-standing Issues to New-emerging Dilemmas
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05392v1
- Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 07:55:01 GMT
- Title: Deconstructing The Ethics of Large Language Models from Long-standing Issues to New-emerging Dilemmas
- Authors: Chengyuan Deng, Yiqun Duan, Xin Jin, Heng Chang, Yijun Tian, Han Liu, Henry Peng Zou, Yiqiao Jin, Yijia Xiao, Yichen Wang, Shenghao Wu, Zongxing Xie, Kuofeng Gao, Sihong He, Jun Zhuang, Lu Cheng, Haohan Wang,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unparalleled success across diverse language modeling tasks in recent years.
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of ethical challenges associated with LLMs, from longstanding issues such as copyright infringement to emerging problems like truthfulness and social norms.
- Score: 27.54990798450857
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unparalleled success across diverse language modeling tasks in recent years. However, this progress has also intensified ethical concerns, impacting the deployment of LLMs in everyday contexts. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of ethical challenges associated with LLMs, from longstanding issues such as copyright infringement, systematic bias, and data privacy, to emerging problems like truthfulness and social norms. We critically analyze existing research aimed at understanding, examining, and mitigating these ethical risks. Our survey underscores integrating ethical standards and societal values into the development of LLMs, thereby guiding the development of responsible and ethically aligned language models.
Related papers
- MoralBench: Moral Evaluation of LLMs [34.43699121838648]
This paper introduces a novel benchmark designed to measure and compare the moral reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
We present the first comprehensive dataset specifically curated to probe the moral dimensions of LLM outputs.
Our methodology involves a multi-faceted approach, combining quantitative analysis with qualitative insights from ethics scholars to ensure a thorough evaluation of model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T18:15:01Z) - A Survey on Large Language Models with Multilingualism: Recent Advances and New Frontiers [48.314619377988436]
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrates remarkable multilingual capabilities in natural language processing.
Despite the breakthroughs of LLMs, the investigation into the multilingual scenario remains insufficient.
This survey aims to help the research community address multilingual problems and provide a comprehensive understanding of the core concepts, key techniques, and latest developments in multilingual natural language processing based on LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T17:47:39Z) - Navigating LLM Ethics: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions [5.023563968303034]
This study addresses ethical issues surrounding Large Language Models (LLMs) within the field of artificial intelligence.
It explores the common ethical challenges posed by both LLMs and other AI systems.
It highlights challenges such as hallucination, verifiable accountability, and decoding censorship complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-14T15:03:05Z) - A Survey on Large Language Models for Critical Societal Domains: Finance, Healthcare, and Law [65.87885628115946]
Large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing the landscapes of finance, healthcare, and law.
We highlight the instrumental role of LLMs in enhancing diagnostic and treatment methodologies in healthcare, innovating financial analytics, and refining legal interpretation and compliance strategies.
We critically examine the ethics for LLM applications in these fields, pointing out the existing ethical concerns and the need for transparent, fair, and robust AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-02T22:43:02Z) - Surveying Attitudinal Alignment Between Large Language Models Vs. Humans Towards 17 Sustainable Development Goals [28.98314322374492]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as potent tools for advancing the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals.
This study conducts a comprehensive review and analysis of the existing literature on the attitudes of LLMs towards the 17 SDGs.
We examine the potential disparities, primarily focusing on aspects such as understanding and emotions, cultural and regional differences, task objective variations, and factors considered in the decision-making process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-22T05:12:52Z) - Beyond Human Norms: Unveiling Unique Values of Large Language Models through Interdisciplinary Approaches [69.73783026870998]
This work proposes a novel framework, ValueLex, to reconstruct Large Language Models' unique value system from scratch.
Based on Lexical Hypothesis, ValueLex introduces a generative approach to elicit diverse values from 30+ LLMs.
We identify three core value dimensions, Competence, Character, and Integrity, each with specific subdimensions, revealing that LLMs possess a structured, albeit non-human, value system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-19T09:44:51Z) - Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering.
The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored.
We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z) - Unpacking the Ethical Value Alignment in Big Models [46.560886177083084]
This paper provides an overview of the risks and challenges associated with big models, surveys existing AI ethics guidelines, and examines the ethical implications arising from the limitations of these models.
We introduce a novel conceptual paradigm for aligning the ethical values of big models and discuss promising research directions for alignment criteria, evaluation, and method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T16:45:40Z) - Denevil: Towards Deciphering and Navigating the Ethical Values of Large
Language Models via Instruction Learning [36.66806788879868]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made unprecedented breakthroughs, yet their integration into everyday life might raise societal risks due to generated unethical content.
This work delves into ethical values utilizing Moral Foundation Theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-17T07:42:40Z) - Ethical Considerations and Policy Implications for Large Language
Models: Guiding Responsible Development and Deployment [48.72819550642584]
This paper examines the ethical considerations and implications of large language models (LLMs) in generating content.
It highlights the potential for both positive and negative uses of generative AI programs and explores the challenges in assigning responsibility for their outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-01T07:21:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.