ControlLoc: Physical-World Hijacking Attack on Visual Perception in Autonomous Driving

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05810v1
• Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 14:53:50 GMT
• Title: ControlLoc: Physical-World Hijacking Attack on Visual Perception in Autonomous Driving
• Authors: Chen Ma, Ningfei Wang, Zhengyu Zhao, Qian Wang, Qi Alfred Chen, Chao Shen,
• Abstract summary: A digital hijacking attack has been proposed to cause dangerous driving scenarios. We introduce a novel physical-world adversarial patch attack, ControlLoc, designed to exploit hijacking vulnerabilities in entire Autonomous Driving (AD) visual perception.
• Score: 30.286501966393388
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent research in adversarial machine learning has focused on visual perception in Autonomous Driving (AD) and has shown that printed adversarial patches can attack object detectors. However, it is important to note that AD visual perception encompasses more than just object detection; it also includes Multiple Object Tracking (MOT). MOT enhances the robustness by compensating for object detection errors and requiring consistent object detection results across multiple frames before influencing tracking results and driving decisions. Thus, MOT makes attacks on object detection alone less effective. To attack such robust AD visual perception, a digital hijacking attack has been proposed to cause dangerous driving scenarios. However, this attack has limited effectiveness. In this paper, we introduce a novel physical-world adversarial patch attack, ControlLoc, designed to exploit hijacking vulnerabilities in entire AD visual perception. ControlLoc utilizes a two-stage process: initially identifying the optimal location for the adversarial patch, and subsequently generating the patch that can modify the perceived location and shape of objects with the optimal location. Extensive evaluations demonstrate the superior performance of ControlLoc, achieving an impressive average attack success rate of around 98.1% across various AD visual perceptions and datasets, which is four times greater effectiveness than the existing hijacking attack. The effectiveness of ControlLoc is further validated in physical-world conditions, including real vehicle tests under different conditions such as outdoor light conditions with an average attack success rate of 77.5%. AD system-level impact assessments are also included, such as vehicle collision, using industry-grade AD systems and production-grade AD simulators with an average vehicle collision rate and unnecessary emergency stop rate of 81.3%.

Related papers

• DARTH: Holistic Test-time Adaptation for Multiple Object Tracking [87.72019733473562]
  Multiple object tracking (MOT) is a fundamental component of perception systems for autonomous driving. Despite the urge of safety in driving systems, no solution to the MOT adaptation problem to domain shift in test-time conditions has ever been proposed. We introduce DARTH, a holistic test-time adaptation framework for MOT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T10:10:42Z)
• Benchmarking Adversarial Patch Against Aerial Detection [11.591143898488312]
  A novel adaptive-patch-based physical attack (AP-PA) framework is proposed. AP-PA generates adversarial patches that are adaptive in both physical dynamics and varying scales. We establish one of the first comprehensive, coherent, and rigorous benchmarks to evaluate the attack efficacy of adversarial patches on aerial detection tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-30T07:55:59Z)
• A Certifiable Security Patch for Object Tracking in Self-Driving Systems via Historical Deviation Modeling [22.753164675538457]
  We present the first systematic research on the security of object tracking in self-driving cars. We prove the mainstream multi-object tracker (MOT) based on Kalman Filter (KF) is unsafe even with an enabled multi-sensor fusion mechanism. We propose a simple yet effective security patch for KF-based MOT, the core of which is an adaptive strategy to balance the focus of KF on observations and predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T12:30:24Z)
• Physical Attack on Monocular Depth Estimation with Optimal Adversarial Patches [18.58673451901394]
  We develop an attack against learning-based Monocular Depth Estimation (MDE) We balance the stealth and effectiveness of our attack with object-oriented adversarial design, sensitive region localization, and natural style camouflage. Experimental results show that our method can generate stealthy, effective, and robust adversarial patches for different target objects and models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-11T08:59:09Z)
• Adversarial Attack and Defense of YOLO Detectors in Autonomous Driving Scenarios [3.236217153362305]
  We present an effective attack strategy aiming the objectness aspect of visual detection in autonomous vehicles. Experiments show that the proposed attack targeting the objectness aspect is 45.17% and 43.50% more effective than those generated from classification and/or localization losses. The proposed adversarial defense approach can improve the detectors' robustness against objectness-oriented attacks by up to 21% and 12% mAP on KITTI and COCO_traffic, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T00:47:36Z)
• ObjectSeeker: Certifiably Robust Object Detection against Patch Hiding Attacks via Patch-agnostic Masking [95.6347501381882]
  Object detectors are found to be vulnerable to physical-world patch hiding attacks. We propose ObjectSeeker as a framework for building certifiably robust object detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T19:34:25Z)
• Evaluating the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving against Real-World Adversarial Patch Attacks [62.87459235819762]
  In a real-world scenario like autonomous driving, more attention should be devoted to real-world adversarial examples (RWAEs) This paper presents an in-depth evaluation of the robustness of popular SS models by testing the effects of both digital and real-world adversarial patches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-13T11:49:09Z)
• Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World Attacks [62.923992740383966]
  We present the first study of security issues of MSF-based perception in AD systems. We generate a physically-realizable, adversarial 3D-printed object that misleads an AD system to fail in detecting it and thus crash into it. Our results show that the attack achieves over 90% success rate across different object types and MSF.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-17T05:11:07Z)
• Physically Realizable Adversarial Examples for LiDAR Object Detection [72.0017682322147]
  We present a method to generate universal 3D adversarial objects to fool LiDAR detectors. In particular, we demonstrate that placing an adversarial object on the rooftop of any target vehicle to hide the vehicle entirely from LiDAR detectors with a success rate of 80%. This is one step closer towards safer self-driving under unseen conditions from limited training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T16:11:04Z)
• Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
  Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security. In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.